Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-10-2009, 06:50 PM   #1
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Saratoga 2009 Public Handicappers' Scorecard: FINAL

http://www.equidaily.com/bestbet/saratog2.html

Top 5 shown. For complete list click on the link!

Excerpt:

Our $671.50 ROI -- while not enough to "beat-the-meet", did best five of the eight handicappers that topped us with winners-on-top and provided ROI numbers, and placed us at #4 among the eighteen handicappers that provided ROI info. And frankly, we were just a hop-skip-and a jump from "beating-the-meet". This past Thursday our top pick in the 2nd race ran second at 21.90-1. And on Saturday we goofed and left the 12th race off of the page -- missing a $6.70 winner [although, for verification, we used the horse on the Bankroll Page]. A little racing luck -- and a little less absent-mindedness -- and we have $50.50 more in the bank and we're a 2-1 shot away from having a positive ROI for the season. But -- that's what makes it interesting...

Note: Discrepancies in total number of races played is due to some handicappers losing races due to scratches.

ALSO: Dollar amounts shown are the ROI if a $2 win-bet was placed on each handicapper's top selection. Not all handicappers supplied this information.

Matt Graves
Albany Times Union 114-361 ... $742.20

Bill Taylor
Saratogian 114-362

Tom Cavanagh
NY Daily News 113-365 ... $692.30

Mark Cusano
Daily [Schenectady] Gazette 113-365

Brien Bouyea
Saratogian 108-361
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-10-2009, 06:57 PM   #2
toetoe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,435
Andy,

I'm sure you agree that win % is useless. Place and show, also. Why bother ?
toetoe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-10-2009, 07:00 PM   #3
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by toetoe
Andy,

I'm sure you agree that win % is useless. Place and show, also. Why bother ?

I'm trying to help take a little heat off TLG!

Not that he needs my help in any way!

Last edited by andymays; 09-10-2009 at 07:04 PM.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-10-2009, 07:06 PM   #4
DeanT
Registered User
 
DeanT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,962
That's a nice commercial for those of us who think takeout needs to be lowered.
DeanT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-10-2009, 10:34 PM   #5
badcompany
Registered User
 
badcompany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 3,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanT
That's a nice commercial for those of us who think takeout needs to be lowered.
The NY Post had its yearly "Battle of Saratoga" in which 4 "experts" could make any type of wager they wanted and didn't have to bet every race. They all went down the toilet.
__________________
“Life does not ask what we want. It presents us with options”

― Thomas Sowell

Last edited by badcompany; 09-10-2009 at 10:35 PM.
badcompany is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-10-2009, 11:40 PM   #6
postpicker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by badcompany
The NY Post had its yearly "Battle of Saratoga" in which 4 "experts" could make any type of wager they wanted and didn't have to bet every race. They all went down the toilet.
We all didn't go down the toilet. Clancy won and I was second. The two of us alternated for the lead until Clancy pulled away at the end. But I wouldn't call it going down the toilet.

John DaSilva
postpicker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 12:38 AM   #7
BombsAway Bob
DimeSupers Really Are!
 
BombsAway Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by postpicker
We all didn't go down the toilet. Clancy won and I was second. The two of us alternated for the lead until Clancy pulled away at the end. But I wouldn't call it going down the toilet.

John DaSilva
I really like the NY Post format of $50 a day, wager whatever you choose...
thought you had Sean in your sights, John.. still,a Solid 2nd, well done!
You Locked into that Quinella/Exacta combo for a while; I bet of lot of
the Picnic Patrons that comb the public selections for bets liked that wager.
It just 'feels safer' for a lot of them.
__________________
Quick Picks, LMSP's, & opinions real-time
@
www.twitter.com/BombsawayBob
[/url]
BombsAway Bob is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 12:54 AM   #8
postpicker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by BombsAway Bob
I really like the NY Post format of $50 a day, wager whatever you choose...
thought you had Sean in your sights, John.. still,a Solid 2nd, well done!
You Locked into that Quinella/Exacta combo for a while; I bet of lot of
the Picnic Patrons that comb the public selections for bets liked that wager.
It just 'feels safer' for a lot of them.
Thanks Bob. I thought I was gonna put away Clancy on Woodward day. I loved Copper Cascade and I thought I had all of the possible winning exactas covered but freakin Smart Enuf had to ruin it for me. I'll get him next year.
postpicker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 07:47 AM   #9
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,446
I was looking at those "contests" they have in the Post and the News - each guy gets a bankroll, they pick what they want everyday......boy, those guys are not too good! I can see having to pick every race everyday as being impossible, but when they get to cherry pick........not impressed. I would think if you didn't increase the bankroll, you were a waste of time. We have guys here who could do far better.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?

Last edited by Tom; 09-11-2009 at 07:48 AM.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 09:27 AM   #10
ryesteve
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
I would think if you didn't increase the bankroll, you were a waste of time.
When did winning become so easy?
ryesteve is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 10:31 AM   #11
postpicker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
I was looking at those "contests" they have in the Post and the News - each guy gets a bankroll, they pick what they want everyday......boy, those guys are not too good! I can see having to pick every race everyday as being impossible, but when they get to cherry pick........not impressed. I would think if you didn't increase the bankroll, you were a waste of time. We have guys here who could do far better.

Well, if you think you can do better, lets see you make selections and plays 24 hours before the races are run. With no scratches and unknown track conditions and having a filing deadline, it isn't as easy as you think.
postpicker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 10:57 AM   #12
DRIVEWAY
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by postpicker
Well, if you think you can do better, lets see you make selections and plays 24 hours before the races are run. With no scratches and unknown track conditions and having a filing deadline, it isn't as easy as you think.
I wonder if a one minute to post value bettor might have an advantage over you.
DRIVEWAY is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 10:58 AM   #13
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,446
I think losing a large percentage of the bankroll when you can cherry pick races is a waste of time as a month long feature. Like the weather, you know, they say sunny and we get flooded out, you tend to lose interest. I never said it was easy, but these guys are paid to handicap. Pay me their salary and I'll give it a shot!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 11:00 AM   #14
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRIVEWAY
I wonder if a one minute to post value bettor might have an advantage over you.
Not as much as a one minute AFTER post bettor.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-11-2009, 11:02 AM   #15
badcompany
Registered User
 
badcompany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 3,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by postpicker
Well, if you think you can do better, lets see you make selections and plays 24 hours before the races are run. With no scratches and unknown track conditions and having a filing deadline, it isn't as easy as you think.
It actually confirms what I've felt for a long time: Saratoga isn't a track at which to bet serious money.

I know some guys, here, claim to do great there, but, for the most part, it's a crap shoot.

This outcome, no one showing a profit, isn't an anamoly, it pretty much happens every year.
__________________
“Life does not ask what we want. It presents us with options”

― Thomas Sowell

Last edited by badcompany; 09-11-2009 at 11:06 AM.
badcompany is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.