Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 12-05-2011, 12:04 PM   #1
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Further evidence Gulfstream timing sucks

Check out some of these differences between final times reported by Trakus and Equibase from yesterday:

R-2, T: 1:35.15, E: 1:34.27
R-3, T: 1:43.86, E: 1:43.08
R-6, T: 1:40.39, E: 1:39.78

Nice of them to advertise that what they are putting in the PPs is woefully inaccurate.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:07 PM   #2
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Check out some of these differences between final times reported by Trakus and Equibase from yesterday:

R-2, T: 1:35.15, E: 1:34.27
R-3, T: 1:43.86, E: 1:43.08
R-6, T: 1:40.39, E: 1:39.78

Nice of them to advertise that what they are putting in the PPs is woefully inaccurate.
And they dare call it the "premiere" winter meet in the country...
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:11 PM   #3
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
And they dare call it the "premiere" winter meet in the country...
What business in the world would do something like this? They are advertising that something is woefully wrong with their information, but nothing is done to correct it. We are talking between 4 and 6 length differences on those races alone.

Before I totally blame Gulfstream, I will spend some time looking at differences at Woodbine and Keeneland and see if they are similar.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:20 PM   #4
BillW
Comfortably Numb
 
BillW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 6,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Check out some of these differences between final times reported by Trakus and Equibase from yesterday:

R-2, T: 1:35.15, E: 1:34.27
R-3, T: 1:43.86, E: 1:43.08
R-6, T: 1:40.39, E: 1:39.78

Nice of them to advertise that what they are putting in the PPs is woefully inaccurate.
Is Trakus including run-up? They'd have a tough time triggering on the track's start timer unless they were wired directly into it.
__________________
http://horseplayersassociation.org/ - "Giving Horseplayers a Voice"
BillW is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:24 PM   #5
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillW
Is Trakus including run-up? They'd have a tough time triggering on the track's start timer unless they were wired directly into it.
They don't use the run up, same as the official timer. Some races are really close, even to a hundredth or so, while others are way off. Whatever it is, Gulfstream is making itself look foolish reporting two things so different when they are supposedly measuring the same exact thing. They would be better off including run up so at least there would be an explanation other than one of the two systems is wrong.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:24 PM   #6
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
What business in the world would do something like this? They are advertising that something is woefully wrong with their information, but nothing is done to correct it. We are talking between 4 and 6 length differences on those races alone.

Before I totally blame Gulfstream, I will spend some time looking at differences at Woodbine and Keeneland and see if they are similar.
This business is unlike any other in the civilized world, my friend...and it all stems from the total disregard that they have for the wagering public.

Malfunctioning teletimers...missing or "estimated" fractional times...men with binoculars creating the charts, using "lengths" instead of accurate and consistent units of measurement -- the whole thing is mind-boggling.

It's amazing how efficient they are in collecting their percentage though...
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:30 PM   #7
Turkoman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Check out some of these differences between final times reported by Trakus and Equibase from yesterday:

R-2, T: 1:35.15, E: 1:34.27
R-3, T: 1:43.86, E: 1:43.08
R-6, T: 1:40.39, E: 1:39.78

Nice of them to advertise that what they are putting in the PPs is woefully inaccurate.
That is simply pathetic!
Turkoman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:33 PM   #8
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,759
this sounds like playing three card monte
lamboguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 12:55 PM   #9
Steve 'StatMan'
Traded By Cubs
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 2 miles north of Wrigley Field
Posts: 5,339
Probably goes back to the old inaccurate race track saying "Time only matters when your in jail."
Steve 'StatMan' is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 01:13 PM   #10
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillW
Is Trakus including run-up? They'd have a tough time triggering on the track's start timer unless they were wired directly into it.
hmmm
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 01:22 PM   #11
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
New advertising campaign:

We suck but it's warm here!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 01:35 PM   #12
The Hawk
Registered User
 
The Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,201
This has been going on for nearly 20 years, at least. When they tore down the old Gulfstream I figured that would be the one good thing to come out of it, but it's at least as bad now as it was then, and it's probably worse.
The Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 02:23 PM   #13
FenceBored
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
What business in the world would do something like this? They are advertising that something is woefully wrong with their information, but nothing is done to correct it. We are talking between 4 and 6 length differences on those races alone.

Before I totally blame Gulfstream, I will spend some time looking at differences at Woodbine and Keeneland and see if they are similar.
I've noticed that the Trakus final time doesn't always agree with the time in the Equibase chart.

For example, CD on BC Saturday (dirt races only excluding Marathon)

Race Trakus_ -- Equibase = Diff
r01: 1:36.92 -- 1:37.21 = +.29
r02: 1:09.96 -- 1:10.10 = +.14
r05: 1:09.06 -- 1:09.17 = +.11

r07: 1:34.85 -- 1:34.59 = -.26
r09: 1:44.30 -- 1:44.44 = +.14
r11: 2:04.02 -- 2:04.27 = +.25
r12: 1:36.74 -- 1:37.03 = +.29

Not even reliably consistent at a given distance.

Races 1 and 9 were won wire to wire, so even the my first idea that the Trakus final time is influenced by the winners position relative to the first horse to cross the timing beam seems like a non-starter.

Last edited by FenceBored; 12-05-2011 at 02:30 PM.
FenceBored is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 02:38 PM   #14
BillW
Comfortably Numb
 
BillW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 6,174
Trakus has an error of +/- 2 feet and a sample rate of 30/sec. I'm not sure if Trakus attempts to correct for the sampling error in software or not. +/- 2 feet @50 ft./sec. would be +/- 0.04 sec. and sample error could put them off by another 0.016. Then the sensor is in the saddle and not pasted on the horses nose - more error.


Given a properly functioning timer, Trakus would be suspect in introducing the error. Unfortunately GP is known for malfunctioning timers, so all bets are off.
__________________
http://horseplayersassociation.org/ - "Giving Horseplayers a Voice"

Last edited by BillW; 12-05-2011 at 02:41 PM.
BillW is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-05-2011, 03:03 PM   #15
CincyHorseplayer
Registered User
 
CincyHorseplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
This business is unlike any other in the civilized world, my friend...and it all stems from the total disregard that they have for the wagering public.

Malfunctioning teletimers...missing or "estimated" fractional times...men with binoculars creating the charts, using "lengths" instead of accurate and consistent units of measurement -- the whole thing is mind-boggling.

It's amazing how efficient they are in collecting their percentage though...
Gospel according to Thaskalos.I agree.Amen.The gap in these times is sick.
CincyHorseplayer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.