Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-29-2018, 02:44 PM   #1
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,661
Should members of congress be drug tested?

... and given a few months suspension on each positive test?

davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 04:24 PM   #2
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
Talk about yer government shut downs!

They should test them for alcohol, too.
And a general intelligence test would be nice, too.

DNA samples to run through FBI database.
Facial recognition to known sexual predator database.

Basic medical exam to ensure all senators are still alive.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 04:30 PM   #3
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,570
No way can the Congress survive a sobriety test...much less an IQ test.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 05:13 PM   #4
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,174
I shook my head when Leahy said he’d been in the senate 44 years and Grassly 36 years. Whatever happened to serving civic duty and going home? We need to get rid of career politicians. They have formed a self serving cabal that protects their ruling class. I think that’s why they hate Trump so much.
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 05:43 PM   #5
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
How true.
When you have been in congress for decades, there in NO WAY you have any clue what real life for Americans is. ALL YOU KNOW is corruption, ass-covering, lying, and dealing sans integrity.

ONE TERM - period.
No exceptions.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 06:07 PM   #6
lex
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 256
No but voters should probably be IQ tested.
lex is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 06:57 PM   #7
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Talk about yer government shut downs!

They should test them for alcohol, too.
And a general intelligence test would be nice, too.

DNA samples to run through FBI database.
Facial recognition to known sexual predator database.

Basic medical exam to ensure all senators are still alive.
Bullshit, every member of the Congress should recieve a license to carry no tests required.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2018, 09:34 PM   #8
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by lex View Post
No but voters should probably be IQ tested.
How about both......
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2018, 07:05 AM   #9
sammy the sage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central fla.
Posts: 4,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Talk about yer government shut downs!

They should test them for alcohol, too.
And a general intelligence test would be nice, too.

DNA samples to run through FBI database.
Facial recognition to known sexual predator database.

Basic medical exam to ensure all senators are still alive.
too bad it will never happen...
__________________
got handed a lemon...make lemonade....add sugar or brown sugar or stevia or my personal favorite....miracle fruit....google it...thank me later...
sammy the sage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2018, 08:05 AM   #10
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
They should be drug tested between Election Day and swearing in day. Then randomly four times per year by a non governmental unassociated agency. And breathalyzer any time there is suspicion when in the chambers or upon capital grounds.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2018, 10:32 AM   #11
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,661
If only there was an amendment to the constitution to allow laws being voted on be the public, not just the gatekeepers of the house and senate.

It is time for national referendums ... term limits, drug testing, ....
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2018, 11:27 AM   #12
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
They should be drug tested between Election Day and swearing in day. Then randomly four times per year by a non governmental unassociated agency. And breathalyzer any time there is suspicion when in the chambers or upon capital grounds.
The should one of those breathalyzers attached to to their microphones so they get tested before every vote they make.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2018, 01:46 PM   #13
clicknow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 3,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
ONE TERM - period.
No exceptions.
I agree.

That would be nice, except that so few Americans are willing to "do their homework" and explore the policies and issues that each candidate has to offer even every 4 years. I'm afraid that changing things up every year would be a bridge too far.

Less than 33% of people in my county vote and that is pretty much across all elections......red state if that makes any difference (which it doesn't to my mind).

So what you're going to have, instead of an "informed electorate" is an electorate who merely takes marching orders from their party. (unfortunately not sure we don't have that NOW).

Given the state of both or either party at this point in time, to my mind anyway, more people taking marching orders is certainly NOT the way to improve anything.

Sad to say, there are going to be people like me who do not feel they are well-served by either party at this time in history. For me, neither is a plate on the menu that I would consider tasty, but I don't have any ideas for alternatives, except that if more people worked together some DECENT plans may come out of it.

Handicapping horses is certainly improved by huddling together at a table and sharing perspectives.

Last edited by clicknow; 09-30-2018 at 01:50 PM.
clicknow is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2018, 01:47 PM   #14
cordoba
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 104
Seems like this chat like C. Booker being the smartest.
cordoba is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-01-2018, 06:57 PM   #15
MutuelClerk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,472
I would like electronic surveillance on them nearly 24-7. Anyone at anytime can listen in.
MutuelClerk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.