Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-22-2009, 02:42 AM   #31
juanepstein
devo-lutionizing
 
juanepstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: its a beautiful world
Posts: 14,134
play australia
juanepstein is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-22-2009, 07:49 AM   #32
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
yesteday 01-21-2009

w/o any handicapping, 101 favorites returned a wps roi of .96

so far this month, 1344 favorites returned a wps roi of .90.

compare that to daves tables where the wps roi calculates to .83

i think the economy is having an impact on the tote board
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill

Last edited by formula_2002; 01-22-2009 at 07:53 AM.
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-22-2009, 09:20 AM   #33
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,900
Joe,

Of course, I am sure that you would be the first to tell us that the sample size is small but there is no doubt that racing is ever-changing. Perhaps it is a trend.

Build a table based upon month-of-year (from past years) and compare to that.

Dave
Dave Schwartz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-22-2009, 11:31 AM   #34
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
Joe,

Of course, I am sure that you would be the first to tell us that the sample size is small but there is no doubt that racing is ever-changing. Perhaps it is a trend.

Build a table based upon month-of-year (from past years) and compare to that.

Dave
what would be interesting to me would be to go back 10 years, calculate w,p,s, and wps roi standard deviation and z scores .
if there were a tend, then i would like to chart it against the s&p and dja..
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill

Last edited by formula_2002; 01-22-2009 at 11:35 AM.
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-22-2009, 11:36 AM   #35
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,900
What stops you?
Dave Schwartz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-22-2009, 12:06 PM   #36
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
What stops you?
I have to work it in with some of my other thoughts
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-24-2009, 11:14 AM   #37
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
yesteday 01-21-2009

w/o any handicapping, 101 favorites returned a wps roi of .96

so far this month, 1344 favorites returned a wps roi of .90.

compare that to daves tables where the wps roi calculates to .83

i think the economy is having an impact on the tote board
In the book "efficiency of racetrack betting markets" page 271, there are a few roi charts .
in 1947 there were 1124 races in which horses that went off at <=1.5 that has an roi of about .90
in 1975 there were 1183 race in which the same odds range horses returned a roi of about .83
in 1972-1974 there were 1730 races that returned about .86 roi.
there are other charts including the 10,000 Fabricant race study (the <=1.5 horses returned about .92 roi in 1965)

I dont know what the takeout was in 1947, but i would think it was less than todays.
I seem to recall that at one time, perhaps in the late 30's the take was 10%
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-24-2009, 12:30 PM   #38
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,900
Joe,

I don't think you need to work that hard.

Racing is changing because of:

1. Proliferation of common information (i.e. downloads)
2. Better tools
3. Whales

I'd bet that you could look at (say) each of the last 5-10 years and see a trend.


Dave
Dave Schwartz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-24-2009, 06:21 PM   #39
mannyberrios
easygoer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by showbet
By no means is it easy, but it is possible to make money with show betting. "Justification" attached.
Very interesting, maybe it is posible
mannyberrios is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-24-2009, 06:46 PM   #40
TEJAS KIDD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 374
Figuring Place Payoffs.
Twinspires has a tab for pools in the betting/toteboard.
Click on the Pools tab and then click on percentages
The Percentages of the pool that each horse represents is under their corresponding number.
If you know what the take out rate is at the track, then deduct that from 100.
Lets say its 18% for wps wagers to get 82%
Now add the top 2 finishers percentages.
Lets say 35 and 15
Deduct that sum of 50 from the 82%
Now we have 32% remaining to be paid out but we have to divide by 2 (1 cut for each horse)
The 1st horse gets paid 16-35 $2.80 or 2.90 if using nickle breakage
and the other gets paid 16-15 $ 4.00 or 4.10 if nickle breakage

If your looking at possible payoffs then you take the % of your horse and use the favorite (or highest % of remaining runners), that will represent the lowest possible payoff for the place. Then take the Lowest % runner and use it with your horse. That will represent the highest possible payoff for your runner

Hope that helps and hope I explained it thoroughly
TEJAS KIDD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.