Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11-15-2018, 03:07 PM   #166
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalvOnHorseracing View Post
I'm not sure of that. His superiors may have seen it as being aggressive to find the truth. I guess you forgot about Mike Wallace and Edward R. Murrow. They bore into anybody they thought was holding back. News people are a different breed.
yes, with one on one interviews .... never at a press conference with many other reporters.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 10:42 AM   #167
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
I'll be curious to hear the decision as I'm sure its pragmatic but...



CNN: 1
White House: 0
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 10:48 AM   #168
Saratoga_Mike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
I'll be curious to hear the decision as I'm sure its pragmatic but...



CNN: 1
White House: 0
Trump-appointed judge, too.
Saratoga_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 10:49 AM   #169
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike View Post
Trump-appointed judge, too.
Womp womp.

elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 10:51 AM   #170
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalvOnHorseracing View Post
I'm not sure of that. His superiors may have seen it as being aggressive to find the truth. I guess you forgot about Mike Wallace and Edward R. Murrow. They bore into anybody they thought was holding back. News people are a different breed.
But did they ever do that as guests of the White House press staff?

You see...if you are a reporter and you're interviewing me on your turf or in the street or whatever and you want to get up all in my grill (for whatever reason), that's one thing. But if you do that when you're under my roof, that's something else. I'm probably going to ask you to get out of my house.

Plus in either case there is the thing about disrespect for the Office.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 11:25 AM   #171
delayjf
Registered User
 
delayjf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
WOW - who knew you had a "RIGHT" to attend a White House press conference. Next time I'm in DC, I'm going to attend.
delayjf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 11:29 AM   #172
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
I'll be curious to hear the decision as I'm sure its pragmatic but...



CNN: 1
White House: 0
This errant decision may lead to the cancellation of all Press Conferences, except in absolutely urgent and emergent instances.
The judge has made a mistake.
Greyfox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 11:33 AM   #173
Vinnie
Registered User
 
Vinnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Spaghetti Junction and Frustration Blvd.
Posts: 1,896
That is a sad truth. There is nothing in the Constitution that states that a Potus ever has to conduct a Press conference of any kind.
__________________
Warm Regards,

Vinnie

"All Human error is impatience; a premature renunciation of method"- F. Kafka
Vinnie is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 11:35 AM   #174
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox View Post
This errant decision may lead to the cancellation of all Press Conferences, except in absolutely urgent and emergent instances.
The judge has made a mistake.
Yeah...then what happens to everyone's right to badger the president?

Maybe CNN will sue the WH for shutting the press conference spigot off to all reporters. What would that do to their right to access the president?

After all...there is Twitter.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru

Last edited by boxcar; 11-16-2018 at 11:37 AM.
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 11:41 AM   #175
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
So no one actually read what grounds this was done on...?

Not surprising.

It was done using the 5th Amendment argument. It's pretty easy to write some rules and move on.

But hey... no press conferences ever sounds nice too.

You guys are a trip.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 11:51 AM   #176
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
This ruling will be challenged and it wouldn't surprise me to see the White House ignore the ruling.
Andy Asaro is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 12:00 PM   #177
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Asaro View Post
This ruling will be challenged and it wouldn't surprise me to see the White House ignore the ruling.
Why would they challenge it?

Right some rules down on a piece of paper and give them to the Press Corps and you're done...

elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 12:07 PM   #178
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
Why would they challenge it?

Right some rules down on a piece of paper and give them to the Press Corps and you're done...

That’s the way I read it.

In fact, following the courts ruling would be so easy that a smart White House could set a precedent so strong it could shut down anyone they want in the future.
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 12:13 PM   #179
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
That’s the way I read it.

In fact, following the courts ruling would be so easy that a smart White House could set a precedent so strong it could shut down anyone they want in the future.
It was definitely a hedge ruling...

The WH will write some rules and probably just try and move on.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-16-2018, 12:32 PM   #180
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
It was definitely a hedge ruling...

The WH will write some rules and probably just try and move on.
That is what I have seen in the past by Trump ... people attack him and he clams up and walks away
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.