|
|
02-19-2017, 05:47 PM
|
#1336
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
|
Yesterday they took down the for interference in the 2nd race. It actually took them forever to even post the inquiry sign (stewards inquiry, not jockey's objection)-- the was literally about to go into the winner's circle when they called the inquiry.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 08:39 PM
|
#1337
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 126
|
Check out Race 6 at Golden Gate today, I benefited from the DQ but it was disgraceful that they took down the winner for drifting half a path with the 7 tiring and yanking the 2 off the board.
|
|
|
02-25-2017, 10:01 AM
|
#1338
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 915
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HorsemenHeist
Check out Race 6 at Golden Gate today, I benefited from the DQ but it was disgraceful that they took down the winner for drifting half a path with the 7 tiring and yanking the 2 off the board.
|
Agreed. Head-scratching decisions across the country continue
|
|
|
02-25-2017, 04:33 PM
|
#1339
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8
|
Tampa 2/25/2017 Race 1
The Horse Side Slams the in the turn goes on to win over the horse. Inquiry but the stays up. I had the horse to win.
|
|
|
02-25-2017, 04:41 PM
|
#1340
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by horseracing101
Tampa 2/25/2017 Race 1
The Horse Side Slams the in the turn goes on to win over the horse. Inquiry but the stays up. I had the horse to win.
|
Sorry should have been the side slams the
|
|
|
03-17-2017, 06:48 PM
|
#1341
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
|
Double-DQ in the 7th yesterday at SA. That doesn't happen very often.
|
|
|
03-17-2017, 08:06 PM
|
#1342
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,053
|
|
|
|
04-23-2017, 02:50 AM
|
#1343
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,053
|
Last race at AQU yesterday was bs
|
|
|
04-23-2017, 05:35 AM
|
#1344
|
Charm school graduate
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by no breathalyzer
Last race at AQU yesterday was bs
|
This is why I preach no dq's, if they're not going to take that one down they may as well just leave them all up and pay the winners.
|
|
|
04-23-2017, 07:20 AM
|
#1345
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,053
|
That was the start of my downfall yesterday.. that bs cost me the pick 4.. it was all downhill after that
|
|
|
05-03-2017, 05:51 PM
|
#1346
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,745
|
Last race at GP - May 3 - Race 9. I have no clue when a horse should be DQ'd and when a horse shouldn't. That seemed pretty blatant.
|
|
|
05-14-2017, 05:26 PM
|
#1347
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 3
|
Hello everyone! quick question
Hello Everyone,
First time poster
Long term ghoster....
As I am learning about these wonderful beasts called Thoroughbreds
I often understand more about the horses than the humans who are connected
to them.
Could someone explain the stewards ruling of the objection in the 8th race at Gp today. Just for fun I won't tell you which side of call i was hoping for.
I honestly don't understand the call and many others like it where the judge's final call hinges on lane interference.
thank you,
Commentator Fan in MN
|
|
|
05-14-2017, 07:36 PM
|
#1348
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,123
|
Don't feel bad, more than a few people are confused by this issue. By the way check out the DQ (or non-Dq) complaint thread in this forum.
|
|
|
05-14-2017, 09:34 PM
|
#1349
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by commentatorfan
Hello Everyone,
First time poster
Long term ghoster....
As I am learning about these wonderful beasts called Thoroughbreds
I often understand more about the horses than the humans who are connected
to them.
Could someone explain the stewards ruling of the objection in the 8th race at Gp today. Just for fun I won't tell you which side of call i was hoping for.
I honestly don't understand the call and many others like it where the judge's final call hinges on lane interference.
thank you,
Commentator Fan in MN
|
The rules can vary by jurisdiction, but this is the common rule of racing.
Fouls: A leading horse, when clear, is entitled to any part of the track. If a leading horse or any other horse in a race swerves or is ridden to either side so as to interfere with or intimidate or impede any other horse or Jockey, it is a foul. If a Jockey strikes another horse or Jockey, it is a foul. If, in the opinion of the Stewards, a foul alters the finish of a race, any offending horse may be disqualified by the Stewards.
1. Was the 1 clear of the 7 when he decided to close the hole?
2. Was the leading horse ridden to either side so as to interfere with or intimidate or impede the 7?
3. Did the 7 horse drifting out in deep stretch intimidate or impede the 7?
4. Did the actions of the 1 cost the 7 a placing?
Is it that unreasonable that the answer to question 1 is "no," or the answer to 2 or 3 or 4 is "yes?" Any one of those answers is enough to knock the horse down.
Last edited by HalvOnHorseracing; 05-14-2017 at 09:35 PM.
|
|
|
05-15-2017, 04:43 AM
|
#1350
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 3
|
I didn't mean to put my question in the wrong place folks.
please excuse me. I have been watching these 2 for awhile now
Figaroa and Gafflione. Something tells me they have beef.
I have never hung out with a Jockey ever.
I have see them cuss one another on the super slow mo replay.
Am i wrong to think that these Jocks sometimes let what happened in the bar that one time spill out into the track?
I did see that one wicked replay about the love triangle from down under.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|