Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-05-2024, 09:27 AM   #76
Poindexter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJC922 View Post
In the 6th race notice the 1 projected at 7-5 in the 5th race doubles matrix and paid 2-1 on the tote. So it goes both ways. At major tracks it's usually + / - a tick in odds but sometimes it's a few ticks in either direction. We also don't know if these horses were bet any differently in longer horizontals. For the tracks to not include all horizontals in these calculations would be a mistake IMO. Yes the DD by itself is very good standalone but why would anyone leave stones unturned to set their line? If they have it at their disposal, use it, right? The fact of the matter is if you're going to keep a really good secret and crush only to win at fixed odds you're leaving more money on the table than you're actually making IMO. If you love something, you're going to do like the teams do, you're going to get every penny out of every possible pool.
Some people know their horse is set to win. The teams are experts at playing every pool. When that late money came in, they were able to take advantage of that info, we weren’t. That fact along with all the other tools they have along with big rebates gives them a huge edge. That combo has destroyed this game and driven most of the recreational money out of this game. So instead of correcting those issues, the racing industry thinks fixed odds wagering will save the day. it won’t. Why, because to make it profitable they will ultimately severely limit anybody that is highly competent, much like many sports books limit players that play “steam” games.


But we can re-visit this subject in a few years. Maybe by then the “smart” people will finally get this program off the ground and everybody can chime in on how well it is working for them. Meanwhile, the game goes further down the tubes. Those 5 and 6 horse fields at Santa Anita and more and more throughout the country are just thrilling.
Poindexter is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-05-2024, 10:16 AM   #77
MJC922
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poindexter View Post
Some people know their horse is set to win. The teams are experts at playing every pool. When that late money came in, they were able to take advantage of that info, we weren’t. That fact along with all the other tools they have along with big rebates gives them a huge edge. That combo has destroyed this game and driven most of the recreational money out of this game. So instead of correcting those issues, the racing industry thinks fixed odds wagering will save the day. it won’t. Why, because to make it profitable they will ultimately severely limit anybody that is highly competent, much like many sports books limit players that play “steam” games.


But we can re-visit this subject in a few years. Maybe by then the “smart” people will finally get this program off the ground and everybody can chime in on how well it is working for them. Meanwhile, the game goes further down the tubes. Those 5 and 6 horse fields at Santa Anita and more and more throughout the country are just thrilling.
You can say nevermind fixed odds, that's fine but you still have a boatload of problems on your hands if you want to bring new people in. Not knowing what things will pay is just one of several problems when you're trying to sell this to someone as something worthy of spending hours of their day on. The fact that you got rid of rebates and CAW and made every field 10 horses, you think that'll do it? I haven't heard anything that I think would make it compelling to someone looking in from the outside.
__________________
North American Class Rankings

Last edited by MJC922; 03-05-2024 at 10:18 AM.
MJC922 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-05-2024, 11:14 AM   #78
Poindexter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJC922 View Post
You can say nevermind fixed odds, that's fine but you still have a boatload of problems on your hands if you want to bring new people in. Not knowing what things will pay is just one of several problems when you're trying to sell this to someone as something worthy of spending hours of their day on. The fact that you got rid of rebates and CAW and made every field 10 horses, you think that'll do it? I haven't heard anything that I think would make it compelling to someone looking in from the outside.

You left out number one on the list. Fix the pricing and preferably eliminate rebates.To put if very simply, this is 2024. Your successful gambling markets are all in the single digits takeout. Moreover, the caw/rebates issue just means that this game isn't being dealt from a fair deck. Business people love to say that it is common business practice to give volume discounts to good customers. Not analogous here. If you want to buy a million covid masks at 45% off the supplier can do that for you and not affect the pricing on any of his other customers. Not the case in the parimutuel markets. The racing industry is welcome to live in the delusion that they can sustain the market by giving proper pricing to few and gouging the rest of the betting population. But all data and facts indicates that the model has been a complete failure. Common sense indicates that is a model that cannot work. I have preached it for years and years now. People like to gamble. They do not like to be ripped off. People expect to lose and tolerate losing, but they do not want to lose their shoes and shirt.

For the record I have never said to get rid of caw. I have said to get rid of rebates. The last second access to the pools by the caw however is over the top. If they want to pretend to be dealing from a fair deck they need to cut caw access to all pools at 2 minutes (to be honest they should be out of the computer period-they can batch bet all they want but letting them into the computer is begging for them to take advantage) But honestly if they fixed the pricing issue, the market could probably live with the last second access to the pools.

Racing is a form of advantage gambling. It's main appeal is to those who like to use their skill set to make an income in a past time that in my book, is and certainly could be quite enjoyable. These are the people racing needs to attract. There are zillions of them out there, but they either see the takeout and say no thanks or they try it for a while and realize how much tougher it is than their 5 percent takeout games. The rest of the betting public is people out spending a day watching beautiful horses run their hearts out and will gamble just for the sake of gambling. These people are very tolerant of losing but once again 20-35 percent takeout for the typical non rebated bettor is off the charts. Thus these people bet very small and will always bet very small.

If the game would not be compelling if priced properly and dealt from a fair deck, why woud it suddenly be complelling because Fanduel is throwing up +160 fixed odd on a favorite. Nobody starts off loving this game. You go to the races and you get intrigued about the possibility of using your mind to beat the game. The more you learn the game, the more interesting it becomes and the more driven you are to reach the promised land. But in it's current state 1 in 100 or 1 in 200 might be able to approach profitability sans rebate. IMO fixed odds wagering likely will not change these numbers much if at all. Thus investing all their energy into futile activities (like offering fixed odds) without fixing the broken model will lead to more of the same. As I have said before all these new things are gravy. But if you don't fix the broken model, ridiculously high pricing and dealing from a loaded deck, the song remains the same.

Meanwhile it is Tuesday so I have very few betting opportunities today. Let's see. Parx 17% wps, 15% pick 5 and 20 to 25% takeout on every other pool. Will Rogers, 18% wps, 21 to 25% takeout on every other pool. Turf Paradise, 20 to 25.8% takeout on every pool. I may as well just give my money to the homeless guy on the sidewalk. To their credit these three tracks are offering fairly full fields today. But these takeouts are beyond ridiculous and moreove the higher the takeout the higher the rebates for the caw putting me at an even bigger disadvantage. Sounds like a winning model to me.

Last edited by Poindexter; 03-05-2024 at 11:26 AM.
Poindexter is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-05-2024, 01:47 PM   #79
MJC922
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,543
If 15% pick five takeout is problematic I don't think anything is going to be enough. With that said I value your opinion and I encourage everyone to suggest whatever they think might help. Things will be tried, some will improve the game and others they'll have to get rid of. Where I disagree is just removing rebates and lowering the takeout fixes the game. I can only speak for myself, I love the game but I wouldn't spend next Saturday staring at my monitor all day if the takeouts were 10% in every pool and the CAW lost rebates. While I'd be happy about such low takeouts being implemented that alone is not really compelling enough for me to get involved.
__________________
North American Class Rankings

Last edited by MJC922; 03-05-2024 at 01:50 PM.
MJC922 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-05-2024, 03:40 PM   #80
Poindexter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJC922 View Post
If 15% pick five takeout is problematic I don't think anything is going to be enough. With that said I value your opinion and I encourage everyone to suggest whatever they think might help. Things will be tried, some will improve the game and others they'll have to get rid of. Where I disagree is just removing rebates and lowering the takeout fixes the game. I can only speak for myself, I love the game but I wouldn't spend next Saturday staring at my monitor all day if the takeouts were 10% in every pool and the CAW lost rebates. While I'd be happy about such low takeouts being implemented that alone is not really compelling enough for me to get involved.
That is interesting, because if they had 10 % takeout on every pool and caw lost rebates I would play every horse race I could for the rest of my life. I would probably never post again. I'd be too busy handicapping and betting.

There you go racing industry. 10% takeout on all pools, eliminate all rebates and you will never have to read another post of mine as long as you live.
Poindexter is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.