|
|
07-26-2014, 11:31 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
Blown Call?
I wonder what Tetrick thinks about Ake's drive. I thought the judges blew the call. That was clearly interference. He pulled late and directly into Mister Herbie's path forcing him to check. This was a tactical mistake by Ake, he should have pulled sooner, Creatine had obviously been used too hard leaving. Tetrick out foxed him but the judges let Ake off the hook.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 02:27 AM
|
#2
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
I think that the interference didn't cost the horse who got bothered the win, that's probably why there was no change.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 07:38 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
It may have cost him the win, that's the point. Tetrick was about to brush to the lead when he got cut off. This was clearly interference. Once a horse is lapped onto you, you can't pull in front of it. Tetrick had to take up hard, believe me, that was interference.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 02:44 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,915
|
I think so too. But the judges make good decisions and bad decisions. We have to live with it.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 04:47 PM
|
#5
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
It may have cost him the win, that's the point. Tetrick was about to brush to the lead when he got cut off. This was clearly interference. Once a horse is lapped onto you, you can't pull in front of it. Tetrick had to take up hard, believe me, that was interference.
|
Did the winner win by 10?
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 05:36 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
I wonder what Tetrick thinks about Ake's drive. I thought the judges blew the call. That was clearly interference. He pulled late and directly into Mister Herbie's path forcing him to check. This was a tactical mistake by Ake, he should have pulled sooner, Creatine had obviously been used too hard leaving. Tetrick out foxed him but the judges let Ake off the hook.
|
Are you implying that the Judges at The Meadowlands don't know how to do their jobs?
If Tetrick had been fouled in any way he would have lodged an objection with the judges which of course he didn't.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 06:02 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 250
|
To be honest, I thought there was more interference when Tetrick pulled late on He's Watching and I had a bet on Menary's horse that day. These late pulls seem to be almost commonplace now.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 07:14 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 752
|
I would agree that Ake cut it way too close there. If Tetrick would have broke I could see the judges doing something. I'm not sure why he waits so long to pull the pocket, this really isn't the first time he's done something like this. You can see in the replay that he's checking over his shoulder several times in the opening turn and down the backstretch. It looks like he is almost daring Tetrick to pull. Is he gaining some sort of tactical edge doing this?
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 07:44 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 630
|
They've been allowing this more and more.
But considering Tetricks' stiff jobs on Market Share and Androvette, he deserved every bit of interference he got.
|
|
|
07-27-2014, 10:46 PM
|
#10
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Biscuit
Are you implying that the Judges at The Meadowlands don't know how to do their jobs?
If Tetrick had been fouled in any way he would have lodged an objection with the judges which of course he didn't.
|
I don't think ive ever seen a harness racing objection. I'm sure they have happened, but its a very rare instance when a driver objects against another.
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 10:26 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
I don't think ive ever seen a harness racing objection. I'm sure they have happened, but its a very rare instance when a driver objects against another.
|
I believe objections are allowed but I can't remember seeing one either. Of course, in this case there was an inquiry, so an objection is not needed.
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 01:45 PM
|
#13
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
I believe objections are allowed but I can't remember seeing one either. Of course, in this case there was an inquiry, so an objection is not needed.
|
They should fine or suspend drivers who do NOT object if there ends up being a DQ due to interference.
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 04:23 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 752
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray2000
|
Appreciate those links, I like checking out who got suspended or fined.
|
|
|
08-02-2014, 03:11 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 250
|
Here is another rule they have really eased up on. Pylon violations. Amped Up clearly inside turning for home and wins less than a length. No inquiry.
Last edited by imofe; 08-02-2014 at 03:14 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|