 |
|
01-26-2019, 08:33 PM
|
#46
|
|
Librocubicularist
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
|
Who said that?
__________________
Sapere aude
|
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 08:36 PM
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor
Who said that?
|
I'm not sure. It was one of the Marx brothers, either Harpo or Karl. Hope that helps.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 08:53 PM
|
#48
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,639
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
In other words, she is so far out there, scientists once heard fro her and thought we had discovered life on another planet. They quickly dismissed it and not intelligent life.
|
When the climate specialists heard her 'world ending in 12 years', they decided it was time to change their data again.
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 08:56 PM
|
#49
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,639
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor
Who said that?
|
A slogan popularised by Karl Marx in his 1875 'Critique of the Gotha Program'. The principle refers to free access and distribution of goods, capital and services
But surely, he took it from somebody else for himself.
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 09:18 PM
|
#50
|
|
Smarty Pants
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Every Vote Counts
Posts: 3,160
|
Karl Marx was a dope.
Same thing goes for Hegel and Rousseau.
|
|
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 09:22 PM
|
#51
|
|
Smarty Pants
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Every Vote Counts
Posts: 3,160
|
This was all worked out by the Framers of our Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
They were there at the time.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 12:22 AM
|
#52
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye
This was all worked out by the Framers of our Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
They were there at the time.
|
Awesome dude....
And for any Klondike believing in this puke platform of the squaw and especially AOC's 70% bracket scam, I invite you to the Laffer Curve.
Works every time.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 12:25 AM
|
#53
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 3,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye
This was all worked out by the Framers of our Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
They were there at the time.
|
They stole that from John Locke's 1689 Second Treatise oF Government.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 12:27 AM
|
#54
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 3,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
What a wonderful way to get all the richest of our nation to leave the country for good.
Pure idiocy.
|
Leave America for good?
And go where? ...
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 01:00 AM
|
#55
|
|
Librocubicularist
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
A slogan popularized by Karl Marx ...
But surely, he took it from somebody else for himself.
|
That he did. Who was the "somebody else"?
__________________
Sapere aude
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 02:50 AM
|
#56
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,639
|
was it Louis Blanc or Étienne-Gabriel Morelly or New Testament Acts 4:32–35 ?
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 05:27 AM
|
#57
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burls
Leave America for good?
And go where? ...
|
Come on......if you’re net worth is fifty mil or more you can live anywhere you want......and there are great places that don’t tax you to death.
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 10:15 AM
|
#58
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: near Philadelphia
Posts: 4,560
|
A wealth tax will shut up all the billionaires like Warren Buffett who claim the tax code is great for him but hates his secretary. Buffett claims he and his billionaire friends should pay more in taxes because that's only fair. He never mentions that he, plus his billionaire friends, hide and shelter their wealth through tax advantaged and tax exempt trusts and foundations.
No need to link a direct quote but he's said such numerous times over the years. Especially when Obama was president. Buffett is the left's favorite billionaire.
A wealth tax, such taxing as the 325,000+ shares in Class A Berkshire stock, at $303,500 per share(!), and the 1.5 million shares Class B shares at $202.75 per that Buffett owns will obviously generate much more revenue than the paltry tax on the $100,000 income or so claims he makes in salary.
This wealth tax will never happen, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 10:17 AM
|
#59
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckless
A wealth tax will shut up all the billionaires like Warren Buffett who claim the tax code is great for him but hates his secretary. Buffett claims he and his billionaire friends should pay more in taxes because that's only fair. He never mentions that he, plus his billionaire friends, hide and shelter their wealth through tax advantaged and tax exempt trusts and foundations.
No need to link a direct quote but he's said such numerous times over the years. Especially when Obama was president. Buffett is the left's favorite billionaire.
A wealth tax, such taxing as the 325,000+ shares in Class A Berkshire stock, at $303,500 per share(!), and the 1.5 million shares Class B shares at $202.75 per that Buffett owns will obviously generate much more revenue than the paltry tax on the $100,000 income or so claims he makes in salary.
This wealth tax will never happen, of course.
|
TLDR
Globalists are evulll...
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2019, 11:39 AM
|
#60
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckless
A wealth tax, such taxing as the 325,000+ shares in Class A Berkshire stock, at $303,500 per share(!), and the 1.5 million shares Class B shares at $202.75 per that Buffett owns will obviously generate much more revenue than the paltry tax on the $100,000 income or so claims he makes in salary.
|
That stock does not pay dividends, so he derives no income from it until he sells it. At that point he would owe taxes on his gains.
By your argument, people that own collectible antiques that increase in value over time should pay taxes on that appreciation, even if they don't sell them.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
