Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


View Poll Results: Are you for or against women in combat
For 24 45.28%
Against 29 54.72%
Voters: 53. This poll is closed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-25-2013, 03:13 PM   #46
delayjf
Registered User
 
delayjf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
Quote:
You guys are talking like they aren't in combat already. They have been in combat at least since the beginning of the Iraqi War. We should not about whether they should allowed in combat roles, but whether we should take them out of those roles.
Big difference between sitting on a Humvee in a convoy or working in a HQ which happens to come under attack and having to hoof it up and down the streets of Baghdad or worst in the Afgan mountains with a 60 pound pack on your back.
delayjf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-25-2013, 10:42 PM   #47
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
What happens after the war when a female POW is repatriated and she reports that she was raped twice a day during her captivity?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-25-2013, 10:52 PM   #48
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor
What happens after the war when a female POW is repatriated and she reports that she was raped twice a day during her captivity?
What about male POWs who have suffered similar atrocities?
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-26-2013, 12:35 AM   #49
BlueShoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Anaheim,California
Posts: 4,675
Vehemently opposed, in fact, believe that women's integration into the armed forces has already gone too far. Women cause far more than their share of morale and disipline problems, as well as lower combat efficiency, according to many senior NCO's and career officers willing to talk off of the record. Women on average have only half the upper body and two thirds the lower body strength of men, and no amount of social engineering is going to change that. They do not have the emotional toughness to endure the sustained sheer terror of prolonged combat. If our men have high rates of PTSD, what would it be for women retuning from a long tour of combat, through the roof?

Am well aware that some women have performed very well in short intense firefights, but that is not the same as actual long tours of combat. Am not questioning the patriotism, dedication to duty, or technical expertise of our female warriors, just their physical and emotional shortcomings for combat roles. Social engineering does not win battles. War is not an Equal Opportunity Employer, the winners are the bigest, strongest, toughest men with the best weapons and the superior training and disipline.
__________________
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
BlueShoe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-27-2013, 09:21 AM   #50
Rookies
Canadian since 51
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,458
This is yet another issue where America is finally catching up to other western democracies- like Canada. I would have thought that a proper maternity leave would have been highest on the agenda but...

I am somewhat in the middle on this one. A Canadian woman died in combat in Afghanistan in 2006- our first. There are legitimate strength and endurance physical differences between the sexes. Therefore, I do believe that those women serving in extended combat zones like Afghanistan need to be selected, carefully. There will be some who are appropriate, but the rules shouldn't be totally open.
Rookies is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-27-2016, 09:18 PM   #51
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Captain Kristen Griest to Become First Female Army Infantry Officer



Historic progress.
She went through the same training as any man,
and absolutely has the right to do the same job.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/veterans...fficer-n563761
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2016, 02:06 PM   #52
delayjf
Registered User
 
delayjf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
She went thru the training, but had she been a male she would not have passed. She was repeatedly coached and allowed to repeat several training courses over and over until she passed. A man would have been washed out had he performed in the same manner.

The CJCS said they would question any training that women were unable to pass and that is exactly what happened here.

There is no "Right" to serve in the Military, just as their is no "Right" to play in the NFL or NBA.

Congratulations Obama, you've weakened a country today.

Last edited by delayjf; 04-29-2016 at 02:08 PM.
delayjf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2016, 02:36 PM   #53
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,879
"Standards" are now sexist.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2016, 02:39 PM   #54
Flysofree
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 860
Can we all just "get along"? Or
Can we all go to the same bathroom?
Flysofree is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2016, 07:25 PM   #55
Tape Reader
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
I vote for JustRalph coming back as "JustRalphella.” (Miss you.)

Last edited by Tape Reader; 04-29-2016 at 07:27 PM.
Tape Reader is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2016, 10:26 PM   #56
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by delayjf
She went thru the training, but had she been a male she would not have passed. She was repeatedly coached and allowed to repeat several training courses over and over until she passed. A man would have been washed out had he performed in the same manner.

The CJCS said they would question any training that women were unable to pass and that is exactly what happened here.

There is no "Right" to serve in the Military, just as their is no "Right" to play in the NFL or NBA.

Congratulations Obama, you've weakened a country today.
Are you privy to military personnel files,
or were you a bug on the wall?
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2016, 12:23 AM   #57
shots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
Are they prepared to drop a platoon of 100% women behind enemy lines in a war?

Will it be mandatory for all women troops, or will they allow choice?
You nailed the questions that need to be answered.
Also , can they do that with children back home?
shots is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-02-2016, 10:15 AM   #58
delayjf
Registered User
 
delayjf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
Quote:
Are you privy to military personnel files,
or were you a bug on the wall?
Yes,
My brother is special forces and knows several instructors who were involved with her training class. I have a first cousin (a Colonel in the Army)who works in the Pentagon who also verified how she made it thru Ranger school. The word is already out, tow the line on gays, transgender, and women etc. or your career is over.

The issue of women in combat has been studied by the US, Britain and others. None of the studies supported women in combat. The Sec of Defense ignored all of the research when he implemented this policy. But that's no surprise with this administration - isn't one of the tenets of Saul Alinsky is to demoralize the military?
delayjf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.