Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-23-2018, 04:27 PM   #61
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyC View Post
Who is "their" in their job? Is it the state? The horsemen or the tracks? Everyone (but the bettor) has a seat at the table and nothing gets through unless all are satisfied. I am just referring to California. It may be easier or harder in other states. I am sure Andy Asaro could fill you in on the difficulties of getting things accomplished through the CHRB. The problem is there are too many decision makers. Nobody will give up their seat or position based on somebody's theory about what would be good for the industry.
I don't think that's the main problem at all. The CHRB worked just fine and there was enough for all the stakeholders when the sport was more popular. Even now, one of our tracks is very successful and another is not unsuccessful, despite having to deal with the CHRB. Indeed, we do better than most states do.

Get more people interested in horse racing again and believe me, nobody will complain about the bureaucracy.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 04:30 PM   #62
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
I don't think that's the main problem at all. The CHRB worked just fine and there was enough for all the stakeholders when the sport was more popular. Even now, one of our tracks is very successful and another is not unsuccessful, despite having to deal with the CHRB. Indeed, we do better than most states do.

Get more people interested in horse racing again and believe me, nobody will complain about the bureaucracy.
That's like saying..."Get more people interested in limit holdem again..."

Easier said than done.
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 04:43 PM   #63
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
That's like saying..."Get more people interested in limit holdem again..."

Easier said than done.
Funny, at Hustler last night, there were about 5 tables of 4-8, 4 tables of 8-16, and 2 tables of 25-50.

So someone's playing limit, thask.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 05:39 PM   #64
AndyC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
I don't think that's the main problem at all. The CHRB worked just fine and there was enough for all the stakeholders when the sport was more popular. Even now, one of our tracks is very successful and another is not unsuccessful, despite having to deal with the CHRB. Indeed, we do better than most states do.

Get more people interested in horse racing again and believe me, nobody will complain about the bureaucracy.
If the CHRB worked just fine we wouldn't be having this discussion.

So your answer is for everyone to be like Del Mar, but only summer Del Mar.

Getting more people interested in racing will require a lot more than $15 margaritas and a Jackpot Pick 6.
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 06:05 PM   #65
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyC View Post
If the CHRB worked just fine we wouldn't be having this discussion.

So your answer is for everyone to be like Del Mar, but only summer Del Mar.

Getting more people interested in racing will require a lot more than $15 margaritas and a Jackpot Pick 6.
My answer is to have a lot less racing, so that the remaining meetings are special like summer Del Mar. And then to try to expand the audience.

And to not expect miracles.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 06:42 PM   #66
AndyC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
My answer is to have a lot less racing, so that the remaining meetings are special like summer Del Mar. And then to try to expand the audience.

And to not expect miracles.
Would you expect a "yes" vote from the horse owners and trainers?
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 07:27 PM   #67
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyC View Post
Would you expect a "yes" vote from the horse owners and trainers?
No. But I think the states and the tracks have most of the leverage here.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 09:19 AM   #68
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyC View Post
I doubt that racing could be a major player in the gambling industry even if priced right. Too many good alternatives in place would be the primary reason. But I agree that it has no chance for survival being priced wrong.
If it was less regulated there would probably be more hope.

If a track has to jump through hoops to change the takeout rate or add new bet types and too much of it costs are fixed as a percentage of revenue (as opposed to a percentage of the bottom line) there's isn't going to be much experimentation.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 12:37 PM   #69
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
If it was less regulated there would probably be more hope.

If a track has to jump through hoops to change the takeout rate or add new bet types and too much of it costs are fixed as a percentage of revenue (as opposed to a percentage of the bottom line) there's isn't going to be much experimentation.
How many hoops did Hayward jump through when he swiftly lowered the NYRA takeout in the aftermath of the takeout scandal of a few years ago?
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 01:16 PM   #70
Denny
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 621
They were in violation of the law. Hayward had no choice.
Still it cost him his job.
Which is too bad imo.
Now we have 'raise the prices' Kay.
(Saratoga goes up again this year, twice now in less than 5 years)
Denny is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 02:04 PM   #71
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denny View Post
They were in violation of the law. Hayward had no choice.
Still it cost him his job.
Which is too bad imo.
Now we have 'raise the prices' Kay.
(Saratoga goes up again this year, twice now in less than 5 years)
Why wouldn't Saratoga go up?

You have a track that wealthy people travel to as a vacation destination. Staying in the town is very expensive (and in fact dwarfs whatever people pay for admission). It is also, other than the Belmont Stakes, NYRA's only chance to realize significant revenue from live patrons. And Saratoga can probably make even more money they more they charge (up to a point), because it will price out poorer patrons which will give the track a wealthier "feel" as it is filled up with more and more good looking people wearing nice clothes and hats, etc. Plus the track is small and it gets crowded when more than 30,000 people are there anyway.

It's pretty obvious that the correct business model is to charge nothing for Aqueduct, very little for Belmont (except on Belmont day and on a Breeders' Cup if they ever get one again), and a ton for Saratoga. NYRA is following that business model. As they should.

Not every horse racing date is about the regular horseplayer.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 02:22 PM   #72
Denny
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 621
Why not raise prices?

Because NYRA is rolling in dough.

Casino dole is paying for everything from purses to salaries to retirement.

Why do they have to charge more for the average family to have a nice day out?

Just because they can?
Denny is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 02:25 PM   #73
Maximillion
Registered User
 
Maximillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Why wouldn't Saratoga go up?

You have a track that wealthy people travel to as a vacation destination. Staying in the town is very expensive (and in fact dwarfs whatever people pay for admission). It is also, other than the Belmont Stakes, NYRA's only chance to realize significant revenue from live patrons. And Saratoga can probably make even more money they more they charge (up to a point), because it will price out poorer patrons which will give the track a wealthier "feel" as it is filled up with more and more good looking people wearing nice clothes and hats, etc. Plus the track is small and it gets crowded when more than 30,000 people are there anyway.

It's pretty obvious that the correct business model is to charge nothing for Aqueduct, very little for Belmont (except on Belmont day and on a Breeders' Cup if they ever get one again), and a ton for Saratoga. NYRA is following that business model. As they should.

Not every horse racing date is about the regular horseplayer.
If they are old...instead of a senior discount they should get charged double
Maximillion is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 02:26 PM   #74
Denny
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 621
They're going to soak NY taxpayers a couple hundred million to renovate Belmont in a couple of years.

They'll probably jack up prices after that too.

What do they ever do for the horseplayer with the FREE CASINO MONEY?

Ever once think of LOWERING TAKEOUT?
Denny is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-25-2018, 02:28 PM   #75
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denny View Post
Why not raise prices?

Because NYRA is rolling in dough.

Casino dole is paying for everything from purses to salaries to retirement.

Why do they have to charge more for the average family to have a nice day out?

Just because they can?
Average families can have a nice day out at Belmont at very low prices.

Saratoga is something else entirely. It caters to a different crowd. And as I noted, I don't think many "average families" can afford the hotels and restaurants in town anyway.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.