Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-26-2018, 11:42 AM   #1
Grits
Registered User
 
Grits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,656
The Jim Dandy

only drew a five horse field. This is pitiful for a $600,000 race, gentlemen.

https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-rac...m-dandy-stakes
Grits is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 12:19 PM   #2
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grits View Post
only drew a five horse field. This is pitiful for a $600,000 race, gentlemen.

https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-rac...m-dandy-stakes
It's a nice half-race, it's just missing 3 or 4 horses.

Would be more attractive if they reduced takeout to say 5% WPS for a half-race like this.

I'm interested to see the race, but can't bet unless the tote board is absolutely irrational.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 01:22 PM   #3
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
Yea, not a good event. Haskell is not much better.
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 01:26 PM   #4
Spalding No!
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,046
Saratoga/NYRA needs to look at dumping the Curlin or re-scheduling it to post-Travers.

The Jim Dandy is already in direct conflict with the Haskell. And while the intent of the Curlin is to provide opportunity for up-and-comers, the fact of the matter is that horses are so lightly campaigned nowadays that a relatively "established" horse like Hofburg is still eligible for it.

Simply not enough 3yos left after the carnage of the Triple Crown to support 3 different 3yo stakes on the same weekend in the same geographic area.

What's even more disappointing is that despite no real 3yo races on the main track to speak of in CA the rest of the year, the races this weekend drew but a single shipper (Core Beliefs).
Spalding No! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 02:00 PM   #5
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spalding No! View Post
Saratoga/NYRA needs to look at dumping the Curlin or re-scheduling it to post-Travers.

The Jim Dandy is already in direct conflict with the Haskell. And while the intent of the Curlin is to provide opportunity for up-and-comers, the fact of the matter is that horses are so lightly campaigned nowadays that a relatively "established" horse like Hofburg is still eligible for it.

Simply not enough 3yos left after the carnage of the Triple Crown to support 3 different 3yo stakes on the same weekend in the same geographic area.

What's even more disappointing is that despite no real 3yo races on the main track to speak of in CA the rest of the year, the races this weekend drew but a single shipper (Core Beliefs).
Honestly, I wish the rest of the country would just follow California's approach. We got rid of the Strub series (other than the Malibu) and don't schedule any 3 year old main track races from the summer on. But what we offer is plenty of opportunities for 3 year olds to face older horses.

And honestly, with so many 3 year olds retiring early, that's what should happen. In other words, instead of going in the direction you suggest, dump the Travers instead and double the purse of the Woodward. Even offer the 3 year olds a big weight break if it will help draw them.

That way we might at least get to see more 3 year olds face older handicap horses before they retire.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 02:23 PM   #6
sour grapes
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Honestly, I wish the rest of the country would just follow California's approach. We got rid of the Strub series (other than the Malibu) and don't schedule any 3 year old main track races from the summer on. But what we offer is plenty of opportunities for 3 year olds to face older horses.

And honestly, with so many 3 year olds retiring early, that's what should happen. In other words, instead of going in the direction you suggest, dump the Travers instead and double the purse of the Woodward. Even offer the 3 year olds a big weight break if it will help draw them.

That way we might at least get to see more 3 year olds face older handicap horses before they retire.
done,
the travers is gone due to your say so.
what an idiotic idea.
sour grapes is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 02:39 PM   #7
Redboard
$2 Showbettor
 
Redboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The Villages
Posts: 2,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Honestly, I wish the rest of the country would just follow California's approach. We got rid of the Strub series (other than the Malibu) and don't schedule any 3 year old main track races from the summer on. But what we offer is plenty of opportunities for 3 year olds to face older horses.

And honestly, with so many 3 year olds retiring early, that's what should happen. In other words, instead of going in the direction you suggest, dump the Travers instead and double the purse of the Woodward. Even offer the 3 year olds a big weight break if it will help draw them.

That way we might at least get to see more 3 year olds face older handicap horses before they retire.
The Jimmy D is only a prep race. The Travers is the signature race of the meet and is almost always competitive. To suggest cancelling it is a somewhat of an overreaction.

TRAVERS
YEAR - Field_size - One, Two, Three
2014 - 10 - VE Day, Wicked strong, Tonalist
2015 - 10 - Keen Ice, American Phaoroah, Frosted
2016 - 14 - Arrogate, American Freedom, Gunrunner
2017 - 12 - West Coast, Gunnevera, Irap
Redboard is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 03:09 PM   #8
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
Yea that is extreme, cancel the curlin, its just not needed and essentially is a glorified alw race.

have to wonder if the jim dandy even makes sense anymore considering the haskell is there. you could keep the curlin and ditch the dandy, that makes sense.
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 03:23 PM   #9
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by sour grapes View Post
done,
the travers is gone due to your say so.
what an idiotic idea.
It is a great idea that will never happen.

It is bad for racing that 3 year olds can avoid races against older horses until after September.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 03:37 PM   #10
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,528
I think moving the Pennsylvania Derby might be a better idea because it comes after the Travers and allows the 3yos to avoid older horses for longer than necessary. I'm just not sure where it should go.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 03:43 PM   #11
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,470
A nothing race for sure.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 03:44 PM   #12
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
I think moving the Pennsylvania Derby might be a better idea because it comes after the Travers and allows the 3yos to avoid older horses for longer than necessary. I'm just not sure where it should go.
Seems to be doing fine right where it is.
Why would they want to move it?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 04:15 PM   #13
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,513
I love Curlin(the horse), but maybe consider a weight break or something for restricted eligible contenders in the Jim Dandy, instead of both races?

Can't blame them if Hofburg runs in the Curlin... It's good race placement.

Maybe Curlin+Jim Dandy=Jim Dandy is a terrible idea? I don't know anything about writing races but it seems like a logical consideration.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 05:14 PM   #14
biggestal99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP View Post
Yea, not a good event. Haskell is not much better.
At least they have good magic. Who actually can run a little.

This years three year old males have fallen apart.

Allan
biggestal99 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2018, 07:03 PM   #15
Spalding No!
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Honestly, I wish the rest of the country would just follow California's approach. We got rid of the Strub series (other than the Malibu) and don't schedule any 3 year old main track races from the summer on. But what we offer is plenty of opportunities for 3 year olds to face older horses.
The Strub series was unique and often drew horses from back east and those try to restart their careers after disappearing during the Triple Crown trail. Santa Anita killed it by changing the distances and scheduling around. Before that, and when there were horses around, it was a very popular series.

The elimination of both the San Fernando and Strub weren't really done to encourage horses to start in the other 4yo and up races, because Santa Anita (read: Stronach Group) is trying to kill those races, too; turning the San Antonio into a curious prep for the Pegasus at Gulfstream while watching the San Pasqual and even the Big Cap wither away like a couple of prunes...

Quote:
And honestly, with so many 3 year olds retiring early, that's what should happen. In other words, instead of going in the direction you suggest, dump the Travers instead and double the purse of the Woodward. Even offer the 3 year olds a big weight break if it will help draw them.
Most of the major 3yos that have retired early in the last couple of decades did so because they were injured, not because of stud deals. So that plan wouldn't necessarily work. Off the top of my head, of the one's that retired arbitrarily, I think only Lookin At Lucky (BC Classic) and Orb (Jockey Club Gold Cup) failed to take on older horses more than once. Into Mischief, and it's debatable whether he was a major 3yo, might be the only one he never faced his elders.
Spalding No! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.