Why are liberals so angry?

[Zydeco]

Originally Posted by Striker

Before your boy took office people also had the choice of keeping their jobs if they didn’t want to get a vaccine put into their bodies that doesn’t even prevent them from getting or spreading the virus. And what did you say on this forum about that, oh that’s right guess people better get the vaccine and deal with it. So……deal with it.

That's right... "every time I call it a game....Mosty calls it a business...Every time I call it a business..Mosty calls it a game." (North Dallas Forty) They don't seem to get Irony. "You can't argue with a sick Mind" Joe Walsh(1976)

[Tom]

Originally Posted by mostpost

She had to leave the state she lived in and go to another state. Before long Indiana will have the same laws as Ohio and other red states. And none of those laws will make an exception for rape or incest. The United States of America is in danger of becoming the United States of Gilead.
Before Dobbs, the people had the right to decide whether to have an abortion or not. Now that decision is in the hands of a political party. Kinda like North Korea or China.

Read slowly, dipstick....SHE GOT THE ABORTION.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by mostpost

In 1869 the entire Democratic portion of the Senate was 11 Senators. How they voted was irrelevant.
1869 was 153 years ago. That Democratic Party no longer exists. That Republican Party no longer exists. At least in the field of Civil rights and common decency, they have completely switched places.

Bullshit.. go re read my reply. More Democrats opposed the passage of them then voter for them... it's recorded history. Just because you all keep saying not so.. don't make it so. Just like that Democrats are the Klan holders... and still the most racist party. They look at everything thru the color lens... judging appearance pushing division is all with you guys. Nothing but a bunch of racist it's the parties foundation. No amount of flip flop spin will remove that. You Democratic see your loyal base waking up and moving away from Master. That is why they have allowed un checked the invasions to continue. They hope to replace the old voting slaves with a new one.

But with November comes the reins on the crazy Joe Briben Administration and Democrats destructive agenda.

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by OntheRail

Bullshit.. go re read my reply. More Democrats opposed the passage of them then voter for them... it's recorded history. Just because you all keep saying not so.. don't make it so. Just like that Democrats are the Klan holders... and still the most racist party. They look at everything thru the color lens... judging appearance pushing division is all with you guys. Nothing but a bunch of racist it's the parties foundation. No amount of flip flop spin will remove that. You Democratic see your loyal base waking up and moving away from Master. That is why they have allowed un checked the invasions to continue. They hope to replace the old voting slaves with a new one.

But with November comes the reins on the crazy Joe Briben Administration and Democrats destructive agenda.

The switched sides argument is another laughable one, they seem to forget the biggest resistance to the civil rights movement was from Democrats,
George Wallace, anyone? So were the sides switched 150 years ago or 50 years ago, or was there never a switch? Voter suppression, anyone? Acting like a certain type of people would not be able to vote if I.D. is required is very demeaning.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by Tom

Read slowly, dipstick....SHE GOT THE ABORTION.

On top of that it was never an immutable right set forth in the Constitution.
It was contortionist logic... stretched beyond the breaking point in a 50 year span. And was finally struck down and placed back in the States hands and ultimately the People's hands. But Democrats don't like Democracy and Freedom. It doesn't fit their ramrod approach.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt

The switched sides argument is another laughable one, they seem to forget the biggest resistance to the civil rights movement was from Democrats,
George Wallace, anyone? So were the sides switched 150 years ago or 50 years ago, or was there never a switch? Voter suppression, anyone? Acting like a certain type of people would not be able to vote if I.D. is required is very demeaning.

Racist through and through Dipshit Democrat thinking People are incapable of securing any form of ID to vote cause the color of their shin. When 99.9% already carry ID that would meet the requirements. And when asked if showing an ID to vote is a burden on them... most just give the are you serious look... and follow with no.

But those Plantation minded Democrats still think thems people are just to ignorant or poor to do it.

And remember the Democrats are the Party of Jim Crow.