 |
|
09-20-2018, 04:57 PM
|
#452
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
|
Quote:
|
However, some publicly known facts tend to support the mistaken identity theory. I’m thinking of (1) Ford’s failure to remember such details as where the alleged attack took place,
|
Sounds like she was bombed out of her mind, pulling a train, and thought she saw him get on at one of the stops, but not which one.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 05:43 PM
|
#453
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
|
Thanks for this. 
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 05:56 PM
|
#454
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,759
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtothegame
They will?? How so when they have ALREADY done 6 and found nothing???
|
if you were Kavanaugh, and you were innocent, the first thing that you would want is another background check.
keep in mind there is nothing criminal of this alleged fiasco from years ago. also in my opinion, i don't think that if there was something that happened 35 years ago, that it should be the deciding factor as to whether he gets the approval or not. but the way he is denying it now would make me vote against his confirmation.
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:00 PM
|
#455
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
if you were Kavanaugh, and you were innocent, the first thing that you would want is another background check.
keep in mind there is nothing criminal of this alleged fiasco from years ago. also in my opinion, i don't think that if there was something that happened 35 years ago, that it should be the deciding factor as to whether he gets the approval or not. but the way he is denying it now would make me vote against his confirmation.
|
The FBI background check just interviews relevant people and writes down what they heard. They are not judge and jury (even if Comey thought so) and do not proclaim a winner, loser, liar, inconsistent story, doubtful....
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:05 PM
|
#456
|
|
Smarty Pants
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Every Vote Counts
Posts: 3,160
|
Complete nonsense.
Vote against him for what?
You just contradicted yourself.
He denies it therefore he's guilty?
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:08 PM
|
#457
|
|
Smarty Pants
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Every Vote Counts
Posts: 3,160
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
the way he is denying it now would make me vote against his confirmation.
|
Welcome to La La land.
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:11 PM
|
#458
|
|
Smarty Pants
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Every Vote Counts
Posts: 3,160
|
You don't think it should be the deciding factor?
What do you think then?
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:12 PM
|
#459
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
|
Interesting post.
The most compelling evidence would be if someone jumped up and said "Brett didn't do it!
I am the Spartacus you are mistaking him for."
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:48 PM
|
#460
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,905
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
if you were Kavanaugh, and you were innocent, the first thing that you would want is another background check.
keep in mind there is nothing criminal of this alleged fiasco from years ago. also in my opinion, i don't think that if there was something that happened 35 years ago, that it should be the deciding factor as to whether he gets the approval or not. but the way he is denying it now would make me vote against his confirmation.
|
What "way" should he be denying it that would make you vote for him?
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 06:51 PM
|
#461
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 5,597
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
if you were Kavanaugh, and you were innocent, the first thing that you would want is another background check.
keep in mind there is nothing criminal of this alleged fiasco from years ago. also in my opinion, i don't think that if there was something that happened 35 years ago, that it should be the deciding factor as to whether he gets the approval or not. but the way he is denying it now would make me vote against his confirmation.
|
No, If I were Kavanaugh, AFTER ALREADY GOING THROUGH 6, I would not want another as you say. Especially since there accuser doesn't want to testify ONCE!!
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed.
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 07:03 PM
|
#462
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtothegame
No, If I were Kavanaugh, AFTER ALREADY GOING THROUGH 6, I would not want another as you say. Especially since there accuser doesn't want to testify ONCE!!
|
Exactly! All the burden of proof is on the accuser.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 07:04 PM
|
#463
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,790
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Maybe he will be confirmed, but the FBI does background investigation on all nominees and appointments for a major federal position, in addition to criminal investigations.
And they often reopen an investigation if new information is uncovered
It is ABSOLUTELY their jurisdiction
|
Sorry cap.......you’re wrong.
They have absolutely no jurisdiction and the statute of limitations has run, no local authority has a reason to investigate either. Btw, there is nothing to investigate.....
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 07:14 PM
|
#464
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
Interesting post.
The most compelling evidence would be if someone jumped up and said "Brett didn't do it!
I am the Spartacus you are mistaking him for."
|
I bet knew a lot Spartacus's in her day! 
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
