View Poll Results: How do you feel about gun control laws?
|
Current laws infringe on our rights and should be weakened
|
|
21 |
17.80% |
Current laws are just fine, thanks. We don't need anything more
|
|
28 |
23.73% |
Current laws are not satisfactory, there are "common sense" adjustments that should be made
|
|
69 |
58.47% |
|
|
04-07-2018, 01:48 PM
|
#661
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,858
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
This guy was appointed by Reagan. Maybe an early indication of Reagan's later mental decline.
|
Hence the requirement of a yearly mental check.
No one can remain a judge for very long before they get too used the robes and the "your honor" BS.
I'm for calling them, in court, HEY ASSHOLE!
Keep it real.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
04-07-2018, 04:41 PM
|
#662
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
the judge will be overturned I'm sure.
|
|
|
04-07-2018, 05:00 PM
|
#663
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66
the judge will be overturned I'm sure.
|
It has to get to the Supreme Court before it can be overturned, and SCOTUS is declining to hear appeals of such cases lately.
Quote:
The Supreme Court declined to hear two gun-rights cases on Monday, continuing a trend of refusing such cases going back several years.
The Court decided not to take up either Kolbe v. Hogan or Norman v. Florida in their latest order list. The two cases represent challenges to Maryland and Florida's gun-control laws. Kolbe challenged the constitutionality of Maryland's ban on certain semi-automatic rifles and handguns. Norman challenged Florida's ban on the open carry of firearms in public.
The gun laws in both cases were upheld in lower courts. The Supreme Court's decision not to take up either case means the lower court rulings and the laws will remain in place.
The Court's reluctance to take up gun-rights cases in recent years has left gun-rights activists and even some members of the Court frustrated. When the Court refused to hear Peruta v. California, a challenge to California's restrictive gun-carry laws, Justice Gorsuch and Justice Thomas filed a dissent.
|
http://freebeacon.com/issues/supreme...-rights-cases/
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
04-07-2018, 05:07 PM
|
#664
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barahona44
I have some 2nd Amendment protected muskets I'm willing to let go for a reasonable price.Used by Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys when they captured Fort Ticonderoga!
|
My wife from Vermont would bid.......
One of our many stops......Ft. Ticonderoga.......the Green Mountain Boys are sacred to her
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
04-08-2018, 07:32 AM
|
#665
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
Fair warning
|
|
|
04-08-2018, 09:00 AM
|
#666
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,786
|
South Carolina introduced a bill this week that would call for succession if the Feds started taking guns......
It won’t go anywhere......yet
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
04-08-2018, 12:14 PM
|
#667
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
|
I think they will eventually have to
|
|
|
04-08-2018, 08:00 PM
|
#668
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,858
|
When will they get to it?
Those damn Supremes just keep us hangin on.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
04-10-2018, 11:11 AM
|
#669
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
She's"smoking" gun hot! Thanks
|
|
|
04-14-2018, 04:46 PM
|
#670
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
The truth hurts!
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
04-23-2018, 01:59 AM
|
#671
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
A sign of the times.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
04-25-2018, 03:17 PM
|
#672
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
NRA breaks fund raising record
|
|
|
04-27-2018, 04:32 PM
|
#673
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
The NRA and the California Rifle and Pistol Association are suing the state over a new law limiting residents to purchasing ammo only from in-state vendors. Any ammo ordered online must be delivered to a licensed gun dealer, who will charge a handling fee.
The suit also addresses a new law to become effective on 1/1/19 requiring a background check on every purchase of ammo.
http://www.breitbart.com/california/...tion-controls/
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
05-02-2018, 12:20 AM
|
#674
|
gelding
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
|
Huh!
|
|
|
05-02-2018, 03:31 AM
|
#675
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bossier City, Louisiana
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
A sign of the times.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
The truth hurts!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek
|
That is 3 posts with some good stuff. Think I need to renew my NRA membership for another 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|