Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 02-05-2019, 02:38 PM   #31
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
I’m as middle class as it gets. Just did mine too and $3217 less this year. If you didn’t pay less in taxes you are either making making too much money or not making enough to pay much in taxes. My kids paid less than me
When did this become a thing?
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 02:45 PM   #32
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,814
I cannot imagine ever making TOO MUCH money!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 02:49 PM   #33
barahona44
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Diez meses en Port St. Lucie, FL; two months in the Dominican Republic
Posts: 4,355
Apparently you have to use the word 'making' twice when describing the earning of too much scratch.
__________________
"But don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. "

Fleetwood Mac, Oh Well, Part 1 (1969)
barahona44 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:02 PM   #34
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
I just didn't know it was possible for "republicans" to accuse someone of making two much money.

On raw percentages my liability seemed about the same but my income from year to year can fluctuate quite a bit so... probably not the best reference point.
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...

Last edited by elysiantraveller; 02-05-2019 at 03:04 PM.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:03 PM   #35
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
I just didn't know it was possible for "republicans" to accuse someone of making two much money.

On raw percentages my liability seemed about the same but my income from year to year can fluctuate quite a bit so...
I don't think he was accusing people of making too much money. I think he was saying they made too much money this year to pay less in taxes this year, despite the tax cut.

You're so caught up in your agenda, you seem to be missing the obvious.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!

Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 02-05-2019 at 03:04 PM.
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:05 PM   #36
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
I don't think he was accusing people of making too much money. I think he was saying they made too much money this year to pay less in taxes this year, despite the tax cut.

You're so caught up in your agenda, you seem to be missing the obvious.
I don't think anybody but you read it as that way...

Its something Mosty would say and you'd call him right out on it.
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:15 PM   #37
barahona44
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Diez meses en Port St. Lucie, FL; two months in the Dominican Republic
Posts: 4,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
I don't think he was accusing people of making too much money. I think he was saying they made too much money this year to pay less in taxes this year, despite the tax cut.

You're so caught up in your agenda, you seem to be missing the obvious.
I interpreted it as a gentle ribbing of Chad's post.I knew what he meant (a too high income makes one ineligible for the cut.) ,but some of us take everything so serious like.
__________________
"But don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. "

Fleetwood Mac, Oh Well, Part 1 (1969)
barahona44 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:26 PM   #38
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by barahona44 View Post
I interpreted it as a gentle ribbing of Chad's post.I knew what he meant (a too high income makes one ineligible for the cut.) ,but some of us take everything so serious like.
Sarcasm fail...

Tom and I are playing nice to each other and Mike doesn't know what to do so he grabs his spoon and head toward the pot.
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:37 PM   #39
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
Sarcasm fail...

Tom and I are playing nice to each other and Mike doesn't know what to do so he grabs his spoon and head toward the pot.
I really don't care how you and Tom play to each other. As long as you both follow the rules.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 03:38 PM   #40
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
I don't think anybody but you read it as that way...
What? It's clear as day when you don't have a daily agenda to fulfill.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 04:50 PM   #41
TJDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
If so I'll believe him... hell it works for Trump.
We shall soon see.
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
TJDave is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 05:03 PM   #42
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave View Post
We shall soon see.
That we shall...

Care to float any thoughts on what will be there?
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 05:04 PM   #43
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,629
mostpost $313 might not seem like much, but if you put it percentagewise it could be a big chunk.
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 05:32 PM   #44
AndyC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
mostpost $313 might not seem like much, but if you put it percentagewise it could be a big chunk.
For someone to only benefit $313 it would mean 1 of 2 things: 1) taxable income very low with little tax paid or 2) many deductions lost because of limitations on SALT and the elimination of most miscellaneous deductions. Of course losing deductions because they exceeded limits mean that you were paying high property taxes and/or high state income taxes and/or high investment expenses which of course means you are either wealthy, a high earner or both.
__________________
Best writing advice ever received: Never use a long word when a diminutive one will suffice.
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2019, 05:37 PM   #45
Striker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,987
Mostie you obviously were not the best in math in school, and to think people have to be extremely wealthy in order to be saving around $3000 thanks to the new tax law is quite laughable. A single person who makes $100k per year with no kids and uses the standard deduction will owe around $2700 less in federal taxes because of the new law. A family of four making the same amount who use the standard deduction will end up saving around $3000 less in federal taxes, mainly cause of the child tax credit increase of $1000 to make it $2000 per child now. If Tom is single and doesn’t have kids it’s fairly easy to see where he would fall in income based on these numbers and it isn’t in the so called top 10%. A good hint would be that Tom is saving around 4% in taxes on most of his income in the range of $82501-$157500 as that tax rate went from 28% down to 24% and this would easily allow him to owe around $3200 less in taxes.
Striker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.