Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-14-2024, 09:32 PM   #1
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Cancer Is Striking More Young People, and Doctors Are Alarmed and Baffled

Gee, I wonder what could be responsible for this rise in cancer among young people?

I'm baffled too...

From the WSJ:

https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcar...ffled-49c766ed

No-paywall link:

https://archive.ph/cwVRE

Quote:
A study in BMJ Oncology last year reported a sharp global rise in cancers in people under 50, with the highest rates in North America, Australia and Western Europe.
All the places where they forced the VAX on young people the most...interesting...interesting...
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-14-2024, 11:10 PM   #2
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Gee, I wonder what could be responsible for this rise in cancer among young people?

I'm baffled too...

From the WSJ:

https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcar...ffled-49c766ed

No-paywall link:

https://archive.ph/cwVRE

All the places where they forced the VAX on young people the most...interesting...interesting...
It scares me for what’s coming down the pike…….what are we going to be dealing with in ten years?
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-14-2024, 11:52 PM   #3
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,291
The study cited in the WSJ article looked at cancer rates between 2010 and 2019. Link, here:
https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000049#DC1

Quote:
Results Global incidence of early-onset cancer increased by 79.1% and the number of early-onset cancer deaths increased by 27.7% between 1990 and 2019...

Odd the authors decided to stop there, no?

Especially given that the study was published on 5 September, 2023.

El Gato Malo (the pen name of) the author who writes the Bad Cattitude Substack raised that same question in his write up, here:
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/upticks-in-cancer

Quote:
the biden administration has been all over this.

many seem to be presuming this WSJ piece indicates a sort of mainstreaming of the idea that we’re seeing a big cancer surge post covid/covid vaccine.

alas, i do not think this is so.

the WSJ piece does not even include the covid era. its analysis ends in 2019.

Quote:
Cancer is hitting more young people in the U.S. and around the globe, baffling doctors. Diagnosis rates in the U.S. rose in 2019 to 107.8 cases per 100,000 people under 50, up 12.8% from 95.6 in 2000, federal data show. A study in BMJ Oncology last year reported a sharp global rise in cancers in people under 50, with the highest rates in North America, Australia and Western Europe.
the study is “Global trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019” and can be accessed through the link above.

the big jump in colorectal diagnosis seems to pop. note that these are cases, not deaths, and so it’s very possible screening rates are having a big effect here. this is not a rise in other groups. my base guess here is it’s just a big uptick in screening younger people. (why does no one ever control for sample rate?)




overall cancer rates per capita actually dropped in the US over this period. (source CDC) note that this chart also truncates pre 2021.




but, given the data post 2020, it seems simply wild to me to do a study like this right now and end it in 2019. that seems more than a coincidence. it seems like an attempt to normalize a more recent trend that’s accelerating aggressively before it becomes more apparent.

in UK, excess deaths of younger people from cancer spiked in 2021 and blew out to 40% in 2022.



the US has also seen unprecedented issues that longtime gatopal™ ethical skeptic has been tracking for years now.





the BMJ article causes “alarm” over a 13% rise in cases over a 20 year period, but somehow ignores that in the 2 years following the mass rollout of untested mRNA vaccines manufactured using a process materially different than anything run through drug trials and prone to massive error, impurity, and infidelity that we’re seeing something well in excess of that showing up in actual deaths in just a 3 year period.

that’s quite a substantial omission/point to stop being curious.

“other than that, mrs lincoln, how was the play?”

given the terrible issues around SV40 promoters (an oncogenic) and the pseudo-uridines that can shut down TLR’s (which identify cancer for the immune system) and all the plasmids and CG enrichment in these synthetic spike proteins and genetic factories, this is unfortunately NOT a shocking outcome.

Imo, El Gato Malo makes some good points.

The data, including official ONS (Office of National Statistics) data from England and Wales definitely shows that Cancer rates took off post post vaccine rollout in 2021.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if the live SV40 DNA contamination (discovered by Kevin McKernan) in the Pfizer vaccine product turns out to be a huge contributing factor if not root cause.


-jp
.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 12:31 AM   #4
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
They are sowing the seed for excuses and deflections...

"this has been going on for 20 years.." lol
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 01:59 AM   #5
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
To consider the GENERIC term "cancer" as a single disease disqualifies all this "evidence."

Cancer have differing tissue at the onset, some are responsive to hormones, some are related to chemical of physical trauma, etc etc. etc.


CANCERS are widely different, so one cannot just talk about them in some sort of ignorant combined group.
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 02:05 AM   #6
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
To consider the GENERIC term "cancer" as a single disease disqualifies all this "evidence."

Cancer have differing tissue at the onset, some are responsive to hormones, some are related to chemical of physical trauma, etc etc. etc.


CANCERS are widely different, so one cannot just talk about them in some sort of ignorant combined group.
you realize you just typed nothingness, right?
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 02:07 AM   #7
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36633525/

Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, 1,958,310 new cancer cases and 609,820 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Cancer incidence increased for prostate cancer by 3% annually from 2014 through 2019 after two decades of decline, translating to an additional 99,000 new cases; otherwise, however, incidence trends were more favorable in men compared to women. For example, lung cancer in women decreased at one half the pace of men (1.1% vs. 2.6% annually) from 2015 through 2019, and breast and uterine corpus cancers continued to increase, as did liver cancer and melanoma, both of which stabilized in men aged 50 years and older and declined in younger men. However, a 65% drop in cervical cancer incidence during 2012 through 2019 among women in their early 20s, the first cohort to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine, foreshadows steep reductions in the burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers, the majority of which occur in women. Despite the pandemic, and in contrast with other leading causes of death, the cancer death rate continued to decline from 2019 to 2020 (by 1.5%), contributing to a 33% overall reduction since 1991 and an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted. This progress increasingly reflects advances in treatment, which are particularly evident in the rapid declines in mortality (approximately 2% annually during 2016 through 2020) for leukemia, melanoma, and kidney cancer, despite stable/increasing incidence, and accelerated declines for lung cancer. In summary, although cancer mortality rates continue to decline, future progress may be attenuated by rising incidence for breast, prostate, and uterine corpus cancers, which also happen to have the largest racial disparities in mortality.
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 02:09 AM   #8
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/12/healt...ess/index.html


The rate of people dying from cancer in the United States has continuously declined over the past three decades, according to a new report from the American Cancer Society.

he US cancer death rate has fallen 33% since 1991, which corresponds to an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted, according to the report, published Thursday in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. The rate of lives lost to cancer continued to shrink in the most recent year for which data is available, between 2019 and 2020, by 1.5%.

The 33% decline in cancer mortality is “truly formidable,” said Karen Knudsen, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society.

The report attributes this steady progress to improvements in cancer treatment, drops in smoking and increases in early detection.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/healt...ase/index.html

Certain kinds of cancer are being diagnosed more often in younger adults in the US, a new study shows, and the increases seem to be driven by cancers in women and adults in their 30s.

A government-funded study of 17 National Cancer Institute registries, published Wednesday in the journal JAMA Network Open, looked at more than 500,000 cases of early-onset cancer, or cancers diagnosed in patients under age 50, between 2010 and 2019. The study found that overall, early-onset cancers increased over that decade, by an average of 0.28% each year.

Hardly a lot
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."

Last edited by 46zilzal; 01-15-2024 at 02:11 AM.
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 02:23 AM   #9
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/12/healt...ess/index.html


The rate of people dying from cancer in the United States has continuously declined over the past three decades, according to a new report from the American Cancer Society.

he US cancer death rate has fallen 33% since 1991, which corresponds to an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted, according to the report, published Thursday in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. The rate of lives lost to cancer continued to shrink in the most recent year for which data is available, between 2019 and 2020, by 1.5%.

The 33% decline in cancer mortality is “truly formidable,” said Karen Knudsen, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society.

The report attributes this steady progress to improvements in cancer treatment, drops in smoking and increases in early detection.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/healt...ase/index.html

Certain kinds of cancer are being diagnosed more often in younger adults in the US, a new study shows, and the increases seem to be driven by cancers in women and adults in their 30s.

A government-funded study of 17 National Cancer Institute registries, published Wednesday in the journal JAMA Network Open, looked at more than 500,000 cases of early-onset cancer, or cancers diagnosed in patients under age 50, between 2010 and 2019. The study found that overall, early-onset cancers increased over that decade, by an average of 0.28% each year.

Hardly a lot
Read Jeff's post you fool. It's exploding after 2021.
__________________
"If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired." - Joe Biden
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 03:05 AM   #10
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Wall Street Journal wastes time writing an article...46zilzal-bot comes on here to tell us it's a lie

When we tell 46zilzal-bot the election of 2020 was a lie, he comes here to tell us it's all true

lulz?
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 11:59 AM   #11
Rollingpk3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 175
good video on the topic




Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 01-15-2024 at 01:41 PM.
Rollingpk3 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 01:21 PM   #12
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,291
If you want to understand the risk and potential mechanism behind root cause:

Jump in at about the 10:04 mark in the Rumble video (above) and watch through about the 14:40 mark.

That four minute segment should get the message across.

Fyi, here's a link to the research citations for Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, PhD on the Google Scholar site who appears in the video during that segment:
https://scholar.google.com/citations...sortby=pubdate



-jp
.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-15-2024, 02:57 PM   #13
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
My nomination for one contributing factor is preservatives and artificial flavors/colors in junk food.


I do not understand why doctors are baffled, many seem to think they know EVERYTHING.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.