True fools - Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com

46zilzal · 04-25-2022, 07:43 PM

quote: Almost 12bn doses of Covid-19 vaccine have been administered in less than 18 months – a stunning achievement, even if the global distribution has been uneven. Yet more than 30 million children have missed out on other basic vaccinations during the pandemic, with south-east Asia and the eastern Mediterranean region being the worst hit. This means large numbers of young people will be vulnerable to diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough) and tetanus, as well as measles – a disease that continues to kill tens of thousands of people every year.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-jabs-covid-19

xtb · 04-25-2022, 08:00 PM

Perhaps they should wear a mask and social distance.

Elkchester Road · 04-26-2022, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xtb

Perhaps they should wear a mask and social distance.

xtb

Jeff P · 04-26-2022, 10:28 AM

A HUGE part of getting people to vaccinate for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough,) tetanus, and measles, etc. is TRUST.

But what happens when public health officials break that trust?

JAMA Cardiology | April 20, 2022
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Myocarditis in a Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2791253

Quote:

Øystein Karlstad, MScPharm, PhD1; Petteri Hovi, MD, PhD2; Anders Husby, MD, PhD3,4; et al

JAMA Cardiol. Published online April 20, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0583

Quote:

Abstract

Importance Reports of myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination have emerged.

Objective To evaluate the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by vaccine product, vaccination dose number, sex, and age.

Design, Setting, and Participants Four cohort studies were conducted according to a common protocol, and the results were combined using meta-analysis. Participants were 23 122 522 residents aged 12 years or older. They were followed up from December 27, 2020, until incident myocarditis or pericarditis, censoring, or study end (October 5, 2021). Data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, hospital diagnoses of myocarditis or pericarditis, and covariates for the participants were obtained from linked nationwide health registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

Quote:

Conclusions and Relevance Results of this large cohort study indicated that both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. For individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose. These findings are compatible with between 4 and 7 excess events in 28 days per 100 000 vaccinees after BNT162b2, and between 9 and 28 excess events per 100 000 vaccinees after mRNA-1273. This risk should be balanced against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease.

Quote:

Discussion

This cohort study of 23.1 million residents across 4 Nordic countries showed higher rates of myocarditis and pericarditis within 28 days after being vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines compared with being unvaccinated....

Keep in mind:

The time period of the study was from December 27, 2020 through October 5, 2021 - a bit before Omicron surged through Europe.

More recent data published by Public Health England shows very little and rapidly fading vaccine effectiveness against Omicron compared to the original strain.

So if as the study authors contend we're supposed to balance Myocarditis risk against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease: The decision is a different one now than during the time period of the study (before Omicron.)

The study did not access risk for Myocarditis for third and fourth doses, etc.

Other (smaller) studies during more recent time periods have found even higher Myocarditis risk associated with each subsequent dose.

Given the data, it's getting more and more difficult with each passing day (for me) to not think of government Covid Vaccine Mandates as a HUGE BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST.

Going forward, that loss of public trust is only going to make it even harder for public health officials to convince people to vaccinate their children for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough,) tetanus, and measles, etc.

-jp

.

xtb · 04-26-2022, 10:50 AM

Top-notch post Jeff, as always.

Elkchester Road · 04-26-2022, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff P

A HUGE part of getting people to vaccinate for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough,) tetanus, and measles, etc. is TRUST.

But what happens when public health officials break that trust?

JAMA Cardiology | April 20, 2022
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Myocarditis in a Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2791253

Keep in mind:

The time period of the study was from December 27, 2020 through October 5, 2021 - a bit before Omicron surged through Europe.

More recent data published by Public Health England shows very little and rapidly fading vaccine effectiveness against Omicron compared to the original strain.

So if as the study authors contend we're supposed to balance Myocarditis risk against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease: The decision is a different one now than during the time period of the study (before Omicron.)

The study did not access risk for Myocarditis for third and fourth doses, etc.

Other (smaller) studies during more recent time periods have found even higher Myocarditis risk associated with each subsequent dose.

Given the data, it's getting more and more difficult with each passing day (for me) to not think of government Covid Vaccine Mandates as a HUGE BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST.

Going forward, that loss of public trust is only going to make it even harder for public health officials to convince people to vaccinate their children for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough,) tetanus, and measles, etc.

-jp

.

Thank you for this post, Jeff.

mostpost · 04-26-2022, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff P

A HUGE part of getting people to vaccinate for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough,) tetanus, and measles, etc. is TRUST.

But what happens when public health officials break that trust?

JAMA Cardiology | April 20, 2022
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Myocarditis in a Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2791253

Keep in mind:

The time period of the study was from December 27, 2020 through October 5, 2021 - a bit before Omicron surged through Europe.

More recent data published by Public Health England shows very little and rapidly fading vaccine effectiveness against Omicron compared to the original strain.

So if as the study authors contend we're supposed to balance Myocarditis risk against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease: The decision is a different one now than during the time period of the study (before Omicron.)

The study did not access risk for Myocarditis for third and fourth doses, etc.

Other (smaller) studies during more recent time periods have found even higher Myocarditis risk associated with each subsequent dose.

Given the data, it's getting more and more difficult with each passing day (for me) to not think of government Covid Vaccine Mandates as a HUGE BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST.

Going forward, that loss of public trust is only going to make it even harder for public health officials to convince people to vaccinate their children for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough,) tetanus, and measles, etc.

-jp

.

Yeah, they will be tough to convince. Because they are idiots and so are you. Out of 23,122,522 people, 2226 came down with either myocarditis or pericarditis. That is less than one hundredth of one percent.
In the meantime, 6.2 Million people have died worldwide from Covid. And while Mycarditis is a serious disease, it is treatable in most cases and does not have long term effects. The same cannot always be said about Covid 19.

PaceAdvantage · 04-26-2022, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost

In the meantime, 6.2 Million people have died worldwide from Covid.

That's a lot of people considering a vaccine has been available since December 2020 or thereabouts.

What do you think went wrong? And can you provide as detailed an answer, complete with statistics to back you up, just like the person you just called an IDIOT.

Thanks!

mostpost · 04-26-2022, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

That's a lot of people considering a vaccine has been available since December 2020 or thereabouts.

What do you think went wrong? And can you provide as detailed an answer, complete with statistics to back you up, just like the person you just called an IDIOT.

Thanks!

Nothing went wrong. The vaccines are the reason only 6.2 million died. But n order for them to be truly effective, people need to receive the vaccines. And they need to be willing to take them. Being available doesn’t cut it.

It also doesn’t help when people like you and Jeff P spew garbage about the vaccines not being safe. When you try to tell people that minuscule numbers like one out of 25,000 is reason to not get vaccinated.

Inner Dirt · 04-26-2022, 06:20 PM

Kamala Harris with 3 jabs has Covid, those vaccines are awesome.

jocko699 · 04-26-2022, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt

Kamala Harris with 3 jabs has Covid, those vaccines are awesome.

What kind of jabs did she take?

Striker · 04-26-2022, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost

Nothing went wrong. The vaccines are the reason only 6.2 million died. But n order for them to be truly effective, people need to receive the vaccines. And they need to be willing to take them. Being available doesn’t cut it.

It also doesn’t help when people like you and Jeff P spew garbage about the vaccines not being safe. When you try to tell people that minuscule numbers like one out of 25,000 is reason to not get vaccinated.

Minuscule numbers work both ways just so you know. Care to guess the percentage of people that actually die from Covid? Your prestigious CDC organization has also walked back their numbers on Covid deaths but I’m sure you don’t care about that. Oh And I love how your brethren(the almighty post office)didn’t fall under the federal mandate for the vaccine, must not have been that important to them, as they fought tooth and nail to get out of it for their members.

JustRalph · 04-26-2022, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt

Kamala Harris with 3 jabs has Covid, those vaccines are awesome.

4 if you count Willie Brown

Jeff P · 04-26-2022, 07:51 PM

You can learn a lot about the vaccines from the latest batch of documents the FDA was forced to release.

From post #3 in this thread:
http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/s...d.php?t=170101

Quote:

Epoch Times Bright | by Joseph Mercola | April 14, 2022
FDA and Pfizer Knew COVID Shot Caused Immunosuppression:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-an...BMb5e56ST4o%3D

Quote:

April 1, 2022, another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents were released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer trial data reveal natural immunity was as effective as the jab, and that shot side effects were more severe in those under 55.

With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents, released April 1, 2022, old suspicions have gained fresh support. As reported by “Rising” cohost Kim Iversen (video above), the first bombshell revelation is that natural immunity works, and Pfizer has known it all along.

The clinical trial data showed there was no difference in outcomes between those with previous COVID infection and those who got the shot. Neither group experienced severe infection. Natural immunity was also statistically identical to the shot in terms of the risk of infection.

Younger Adults More Likely to Experience Side Effects

The second revelation is that side effects from the shots were more severe in younger people, aged 18 to 55, than those aged 55 and older. (The risk of side effects also increased with additional doses, so the risk was higher after the second dose than the first.)

As many of us have said all along, the risk of severe COVID is dramatically lower in younger people than those over 60, which makes an elevated risk of side effects unacceptable.

As noted by The Naked Emperor on Substack,[1] “with a vaccine that is producing more frequent and more severe reactions and adverse events in younger individuals, the vaccine should have been restricted to those who were actually at risk of severe COVID-19.”

Pfizer Documents Show High Rate of Myocarditis

Interestingly, Pfizer’s documentation also includes medical information that mainstream media and fact checkers have labeled as misinformation or disinformation. A pediatric consent form lists several possible side effects, including a myocarditis rate of 10 in 100,000 — far greater than the 1 in 50,000 (i.e., 2 in 100,000) rate previously reported.

We also know that myocarditis is far more frequent in young males, so for them, the risk is significantly higher than 10 in 100,000, as they make up the bulk of these injuries.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Has Not Been Ruled Out

Many who have warned about the possibility of mRNA shots causing antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) — a situation in which you end up being more susceptible to serious infection than you would have been otherwise — have been smeared and demonized by media and labeled as disinformation spreaders.

Yet Pfizer’s own consent form clearly states: “Although not seen to date, it cannot yet be ruled out that the studied vaccine can make a later COVID-19 illness more severe.” As noted by Iversen, if ADE truly was of no concern at all, the consent form would not include it. Yet there it is.

Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is also listed as an “Important Potential Risk” in Table 5 on page 11 of a document called “5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”[2]

As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death; a total of 38 cases turned out to be lethal and 65 remained unresolved.[3][4]

Moreover, as noted by the Daily Expose,[5] “Phase 3 clinical trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use, including ADE. But herein lies the problem, [because] none of the COVID-19 vaccines have completed Phase 3 trials.”

Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial is due to be completed February 8, 2024[6]— nearly two years from now! Despite that, Pfizer concluded in its FDA submission that “None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED.”

“[H]ow on earth could they not definitively conclude that VAED was to blame when 75% of the confirmed ‘break-through’ cases reported to them were severe disease resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences of death?” The Daily Expose asks.[7]

Pfizer Knew About Immunosuppression

Another revealing statement found in the documents is this:

“Clinical laboratory evaluation showed a transient decrease in lymphocytes that was observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week …”

In other words, Pfizer knew that, in the first week after the shot, people of all ages experienced transient immunosuppression, or put another way, a temporary weakening of the immune system, after the first dose.

As noted by Iversen, this may have skewed infection rates, as people were not considered partially vaccinated until 14 days after their first shot,11 and officially fully vaccinated two weeks after the second dose.

If people are susceptible to infection during that first week, yet are counted as unvaccinated during that time, this makes it appear as though the unvaccinated are more prone to infection when that’s simply not true. Pfizer’s own trial showed infection was significantly more common in the vaccine group than the placebo group — 409 versus 287 — within the first seven days of the jab.

Fully Vaxxed Are More Likely to Die From COVID

The fact that Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were aware the shot caused immunosuppression is incriminating, now that U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:[8]

Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19
Three times more likely to die of COVID-19

The Pfizer documents admit there was a temporary drop in immune function after the first dose, but the real-world data showing an increased risk of severe infection and death due to COVID among the double jabbed suggest ADE may indeed be at play later on as well.

The chart below, created by the Daily Expose,[9] using data from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022[10] (pages 40 and 45), reveals who’s more likely to get COVID. And the infection rate for triple-vaxxed is even higher than the double vaxxed.

(clickable thumbnail attached)

Quote:

The next chart was created by the Daily Expose[11] using data from pages 41 and 45, comparing COVID hospitalization rates.

(clickable thumbnail attached)

Quote:

And, finally, there is a comparison of the death rates, based on pages 44 and 45 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022.[12] Anyone over the age of 40 who has been double jabbed is now more likely to die of COVID than an unvaccinated person of the same age.

(clickable thumbnail attached)

Quote:

Negative Vaccine Effectiveness in the Real World

The Daily Expose goes on to calculate and graph the real-world effectiveness rate of the COVID jab, and it’s dire news:[13]

“If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this means the COVID-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher what the real-world effectiveness among each age group actually is.

Pfizer’s vaccine formula: Unvaccinated Rate per 100k – Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness …

This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 18 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to be infected, with a minus-87% vaccine effectiveness among 18 to 29 year olds, and a minus-178% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 30 are between 0.2 and 2 times more likely to be hospitalized, with a minus-1% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-76% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

The following chart shows the real world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against death among the double vaccinated population in England, based on the death rates provided above …

[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 40 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to die of COVID-19, with a minus-90% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-156% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.”

(clickable thumbnail attached)

Quote:

Pfizer Hired 600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load

For the last two years, we’ve been keeping an eye on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads in disbelief as the numbers shot up by the hundreds every single week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every other vaccine combined over the past 32 years.[14]

As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports, including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.[15] There has never been a medical product in modern history that can compare. Nothing has been as injurious and lethal as these experimental injections.

Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1:800.

In an earlier batch of documents, we learned Pfizer received 42,086 case reports containing a total of 158,893 events in the first three months of the rollout. In that release, the number of doses shipped was redacted, but in the April 1, 2022, release, it was left unredacted, which means we can now calculate the rate of adverse events reported to Pfizer in those first three months.

Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1 in 800,[16] which is just crazy irresponsible.

We now also have documentation showing Pfizer, by the end of February 2021, had hired 600 additional full-time employees to process the unprecedented influx of adverse event reports, and they predicted that by the end of June 2021, they’d end up hiring more than 1,800.[17]

Nothing to see here.

Just can't imagine why the FDA tried to keep their vaccine documents hidden from the public for another 55 years.

So nothing went wrong?

-jp
.

xtb · 04-26-2022, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost

Yeah, they will be tough to convince. Because they are idiots and so are you. Out of 23,122,522 people, 2226 came down with either myocarditis or pericarditis. That is less than one hundredth of one percent.
In the meantime, 6.2 Million people have died worldwide from Covid. And while Mycarditis is a serious disease, it is treatable in most cases and does not have long term effects. The same cannot always be said about Covid 19.

Dumbass

While heartbreaking for the families, the vast majority of supposed chinavirus deaths occur in people well past the average life expectancy and/or with multiple comorbidities. The vast majority of people killed or injured by the chinavirus shots are healthy young adults. These people died needlessly because they succumbed to the pressure or mandates to get the experimental shot. You think the thousands of people killed by the shots is insignificant but when a handful of black people are killed by police when resisting arrest, this country is turned upside down. You truly are a dumbass.