 |
|
06-11-2018, 10:30 PM
|
#136
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
A very thorough opinion of Hannity and Fox.
|
Try to do better next time..... D-.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 12:27 AM
|
#137
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Do you gents have any evidence this happened in previous presidential elections, other than your bull?
|
We have about the same amount of evidence of it happening back then, as you do of it happening in the last one.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 12:29 AM
|
#138
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Btw, most are republicans
|
Like that's saying much... L U L Z
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 12:30 AM
|
#139
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Thinking Trump is being attacked by "real" witches is not keeping both feet on the ground.
|
There were legitimate articles written about this...you must have missed them, just like you missed Obama's "Hot Mic Russian Collusion" moment in 2012 that I had to point out to you.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 12:32 AM
|
#140
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
|
Double LULZ.
BOMBSHELL to who? 
Nobody cares, outside of lunatic liberals.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 09:34 AM
|
#141
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hcap
Thinking Trump is being attacked by "real" witches is not keeping both feet on the ground.
|
There were legitimate articles written about this...you must have missed them, just like you missed Obama's "Hot Mic Russian Collusion" moment in 2012 that I had to point out to you. |
Legitimate? Faux or Breitbart, or National Enquirer?
Your so called "hot mic" was not so hot. I already explained it.
Why don't you consult LULZ. Is that boxcar's first name
A faux commentator maybe? 
Last edited by hcap; 06-12-2018 at 09:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 09:43 AM
|
#142
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Double LULZ.
BOMBSHELL to who?
Nobody cares, outside of lunatic liberals. |
Double LULZ.???
Some obscure rightie conspiracy theory?
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 10:01 AM
|
#143
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
We have about the same amount of evidence of it happening back then, as you do of it happening in the last one.
|
There was NEVER any evidence. More importantly the 2016 election was the first and only time all intelligence agencies issued a report warning us of the Russians actively interfering in our election.
Quote:
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election in order to increase political instability in the United States and to damage Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign by bolstering the candidacies of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein.[1][2][3]
...A January 2017 assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) stated that Russian leadership favored presidential candidate Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, and that Russian president Vladimir Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process."[3]:7
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 04:26 PM
|
#144
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
There was NEVER any evidence. More importantly the 2016 election was the first and only time all intelligence agencies issued a report warning us of the Russians actively interfering in our election.
|
Or, this report is simply part of the "INSURANCE POLICY" talked about within certain FBI circles and made public (ooops!)
In a word, HORSESHIT.
It's been happening for DECADES. But you've lost it completely, so you have no ability to think clearly, so I don't expect you to agree to the obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 04:27 PM
|
#145
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Double LULZ.???
Some obscure rightie conspiracy theory?
|
LULZ is a corruption of LOL. When in doubt, consult Urban Dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 04:33 PM
|
#146
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
There was NEVER any evidence. More importantly the 2016 election was the first and only time all intelligence agencies issued a report warning us of the Russians actively interfering in our election.
|
Thank goodness 0bama nipped it in the bud and there were no effects on outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 05:07 PM
|
#147
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Or, this report is simply part of the "INSURANCE POLICY" talked about within certain FBI circles and made public (ooops!)
In a word, HORSESHIT.
It's been happening for DECADES. But you've lost it completely, so you have no ability to think clearly, so I don't expect you to agree to the obvious.
|
Really? Only the most foolish tin foil hat conspiracy nuts think it's not true.
Figures you would join boxcar and all the rest of ll the loony-tune Trumpeteers.
But hey I officially lost it.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2018, 07:00 PM
|
#148
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Really? Only the most foolish tin foil hat conspiracy nuts think it's not true.
Figures you would join boxcar and all the rest of ll the loony-tune Trumpeteers.
But hey I officially lost it.
|
Not true? I just said it's been happening for DECADES!
You're the crazy man who thinks this was the first time Russia tried to interfere and/or was successful at it.
I personally believe Russia interfered with the 2012 election to get Obama elected after Obama told the Russian President he'd "have more flexibility after the election...." Meaning, help me get elected, and we can do some REAL BUSINESS.
Where did that 47% Romney video come from? Russia have a hand in getting that and getting it out to the public? Could be...Russians are EVERYWHERE...
It was Russian collusion at its finest. But just like the picture of children in cages, no outrage from the left, because it's from the golden-boy Obama era.
No special prosecutor set up to investigate the 2012 election? How convenient.
I guess there were no INSURANCE POLICIES back then...cause they knew ol' Obama would tow the line, even if he was an ultra-liberal. They didn't need no stinkin' insurance policy with Obama...they knew he would play nice.
|
|
|
|
|
06-13-2018, 10:37 AM
|
#149
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Not true? I just said it's been happening for DECADES!
You're the crazy man who thinks this was the first time Russia tried to interfere and/or was successful at it.
I personally believe Russia interfered with the 2012 election to get Obama elected after Obama told the Russian President he'd "have more flexibility after the election...." Meaning, help me get elected, and we can do some REAL BUSINESS.
Where did that 47% Romney video come from? Russia have a hand in getting that and getting it out to the public? Could be...Russians are EVERYWHERE...
It was Russian collusion at its finest. But just like the picture of children in cages, no outrage from the left, because it's from the golden-boy Obama era.
No special prosecutor set up to investigate the 2012 election? How convenient.
I guess there were no INSURANCE POLICIES back then...cause they knew ol' Obama would tow the line, even if he was an ultra-liberal. They didn't need no stinkin' insurance policy with Obama...they knew he would play nice. |
You and all the Trumpeteers are delusional.
We will never have any common ground. When one solves a problem, examines an issue, the "given" in the equation generally is the starting point.
"you are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts?"
...is why we will never agree. I stopped responding to all the ever present global warming threads, realizing no matter what I said, no matter the scientific consensus, the peer reviewed papers, the mainstream accepted opinion was rejected in favor of a few websites often repeating the same scientifically wrong so-called facts claimed by a fringe element repeated by climate deniers here.
This time the factual source, or the given is at the root of our disagreement politically. I know most of the sources you use, but there are others you guys must use that I am not aware of.
What are they?
Last edited by hcap; 06-13-2018 at 10:38 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-13-2018, 11:50 AM
|
#150
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
You and all the Trumpeteers are delusional.
We will never have any common ground. When one solves a problem, examines an issue, the "given" in the equation generally is the starting point.
"you are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts?"
...is why we will never agree. I stopped responding to all the ever present global warming threads, realizing no matter what I said, no matter the scientific consensus, the peer reviewed papers, the mainstream accepted opinion was rejected in favor of a few websites often repeating the same scientifically wrong so-called facts claimed by a fringe element repeated by climate deniers here.
This time the factual source, or the given is at the root of our disagreement politically. I know most of the sources you use, but there are others you guys must use that I am not aware of.
What are they?
|
Common Sense, something you don't possess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
@
