|
|
01-20-2017, 07:57 PM
|
#121
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,766
|
i would be laying the 6 points with both the Falcons and Patriots. more than likely i would make the Falcons a double bet.
|
|
|
01-20-2017, 10:43 PM
|
#122
|
clean money
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
i would be laying the 6 points with both the Falcons and Patriots. more than likely i would make the Falcons a double bet.
|
I could definitely see Matt Ryan faltering. Could go either way.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
|
|
|
01-21-2017, 12:19 AM
|
#123
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer
I could definitely see Matt Ryan faltering. Could go either way.
|
4 of 6 so far in the playoffs...should quit the ponies.
Give me the Falcons minus 6
Passing on the afc game but think the pats win in the end.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 12:04 PM
|
#124
|
C'est Tout
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cajunland
Posts: 13,272
|
Let's go Steelers !
Rolling into Foxboro like...
FEAR does not exist in this dojo
PAIN does not exist in this dojo
DEFEAT does not exist in this dojo
Strike first, strike hard, NO MERCY
#sweeptheleg
#cobrakai
__________________
How do I work this?
-David Byrne
Last edited by PhantomOnTour; 01-22-2017 at 12:07 PM.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 06:35 PM
|
#125
|
clean money
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElKabong
4 of 6 so far in the playoffs...should quit the ponies.
Give me the Falcons minus 6
Passing on the afc game but think the pats win in the end.
|
Falcons very impressive.
Matt Ryan executed that offense perfectly. Brady-like efficiency reading through to check-downs, with no hesitation. There were times when he was throwing to windows that the receivers hadn't even yet become aware were opening (he overcame a couple early bad drops). Even a little wildcat offense sprinkled in at one point.
Going to be tough for the Patriots or Steelers to beat a repeat performance.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Last edited by Robert Fischer; 01-22-2017 at 06:39 PM.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 07:09 PM
|
#126
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer
Falcons very impressive.
Matt Ryan executed that offense perfectly. Brady-like efficiency reading through to check-downs, with no hesitation. There were times when he was throwing to windows that the receivers hadn't even yet become aware were opening (he overcame a couple early bad drops). Even a little wildcat offense sprinkled in at one point.
Going to be tough for the Patriots or Steelers to beat a repeat performance.
|
That offense right now is a machine. Almost a shame they have skip a week to play the next game.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 07:20 PM
|
#127
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Washoe County, Nevada
Posts: 2,253
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer
Falcons very impressive.
Matt Ryan executed that offense perfectly. Brady-like efficiency reading through to check-downs, with no hesitation. There were times when he was throwing to windows that the receivers hadn't even yet become aware were opening (he overcame a couple early bad drops). Even a little wildcat offense sprinkled in at one point.
Going to be tough for the Patriots or Steelers to beat a repeat performance.
|
Disagree. Both NE and Pittsburgh have intact defenses. GB had guys playing defense in a playoff game that would have been on the bench during the regular season. They couldn't overcome their injury issues.
Atlanta has a very good but inconsistent offense. I'm glad to see them get into the Super Bowl but expect they will be deserving underdogs against NE.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 09:00 PM
|
#128
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
|
Brady remains the G.O.A.T.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 09:14 PM
|
#129
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,646
|
Neither Green Bay nor Pitt was remotely competitive today. Disappointing for someone looking for good games
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 09:32 PM
|
#130
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
On a side-note, home field advantage was strong these playoffs, as only KC and Dallas lost at home, losing by only 2 and 3 points respectively.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 10:09 PM
|
#131
|
self medicated
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: toga
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElKabong
Neither Green Bay nor Pitt was remotely competitive today. Disappointing for someone looking for good games
|
Yeah, but that was no surprise.
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 10:21 PM
|
#132
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 19,001
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElKabong
Neither Green Bay nor Pitt was remotely competitive today. Disappointing for someone looking for good games
|
They were GREAT games if you bet on them!
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 11:13 PM
|
#133
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,766
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
i would be laying the 6 points with both the Falcons and Patriots. more than likely i would make the Falcons a double bet.
|
i'd be laying the 3 points for the superbowl as well. the Pats just beat the 2nd best team in the playoffs for breakfast.
|
|
|
01-23-2017, 12:10 PM
|
#134
|
self medicated
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: toga
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitro
They were GREAT games if you bet on them!
|
Exactly, I'll admit I did not talk about the NFC game at all, but I was talking about Pittsburg being DOA last Monday. You'll never beat the Pats at home scoring like they do, which is not enough. The way they call their plays is even shaky. Just as I said, for all the hype, that Pittsburg has (red zone) offensive problems and that defense can't stop teams like New England or Atlanta.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|