Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-20-2018, 12:03 AM   #406
ElKabong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
The FBI does a few types of investigations. When a nominee for various offices is investigated, it is called a background investigation. It is not a criminal investigation. It has been done 100's of times. The most relevant is what happened at the Clarence Thomas hearings.

The regular background investigation had been done, and Anita Hill allegations of which she was reluctant to come forward was leaked to NPR's Nina Totenberg who contacted Joe Biden the Judiciary committee chairman,with Hill's permission, and he and the ranking member contacted George H.W Bush's and he ordered WH house council, to tell the FBI to reopen the background investigation to include Hill's new allegations.
And Thomas was confirmed, and we all lived happily ever after

Get used to that outcome. You can just lay back now, and enjoy it....
ElKabong is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 12:06 AM   #407
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
The FBI has the authority to investigate the background of nominees to federal positions, such as SCOTUS. It can report evidence of a crime, but cannot investigate the crime itself if it is not a violation of federal law.


https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/...leged-assault/
As I said, Trump can reopen the FBI background investigation any time he wants.

He sure as hell does not!

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/polit...ine/index.html

September 23, 1991: Biden says in a statement reported in the Times that this is the date on which Hill agreed to allow the FBI to investigate the allegations.

Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.
September 26, 1991: Three days later, the FBI completed its investigation, and a report was submitted to the White House and the Judiciary Committee, according to Smith's statement. "The White House reviewed the report and determined that the allegation was unfounded," the statement said.
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 12:12 AM   #408
Clocker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days

The FBI had jurisdiction to investigate the Anita Hill case because the parties involved were federal employees and the issues included possible violation of federal rules and regulations.

Drunken teens frolicking at a private party in a private home generally do not violated federal rules and regulations.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
Clocker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 12:56 AM   #409
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker View Post
The FBI had jurisdiction to investigate the Anita Hill case because the parties involved were federal employees and the issues included possible violation of federal rules and regulations.

Drunken teens frolicking at a private party in a private home generally do not violated federal rules and regulations.
Wrong read what posted. The FBI reopened the investigation because George H W bsh asked them to. The FBI does background investigations on anyone whether federal or not being considered for a major office.

Last edited by hcap; 09-20-2018 at 01:01 AM.
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:02 AM   #410
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,476
I think Clocker is correct at this juncture, the only way the FBI can run with it is at the request of the President.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:13 AM   #411
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522 View Post
I think Clocker is correct at this juncture, the only way the FBI can run with it is at the request of the President.
Duh!, that is exactly what I said, and used G.W.H Bush as my example during the Clarence Thomas Hearings.
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:18 AM   #412
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
Wrong read what posted. The FBI reopened the investigation because George H W bsh asked them to. The FBI does background investigations on anyone whether federal or not being considered for a major office.
An obvious example, although it is also obvious they had no access to everything.

Trump was not a federal employee when the FBI did a background investigation on him.
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:19 AM   #413
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,476
Like you will have President Donald J. Trump agree with anything you want, this will be over soon so take your pill.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:22 AM   #414
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522 View Post
Like you will have President Donald J. Trump agree with anything you want, this will be over soon so take your pill.
In English please.

Should I then continue drinking until he is gone?
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:22 AM   #415
ReplayRandall
Buckle Up
 
ReplayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522 View Post
Like you will have President Donald J. Trump agree with anything you want, this will be over soon so take your pill.
Just 1 pill Fasty?...Oh no, no, no...It'll take much more than that, as what's coming is a lot of PAIN!
ReplayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:27 AM   #416
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall View Post
Just 1 pill Fasty?...Oh no, no, no...It'll take much more than that, as what's coming is a lot of PAIN!
Well he always has the Religion thread, and like he said we can all raise a drink when he is gone.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 01:43 AM   #417
baconswitchfarm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
Wrong read what posted. The FBI reopened the investigation because George H W bsh asked them to. The FBI does background investigations on anyone whether federal or not being considered for a major office.



If I may paraphrase a former jackass in charge , if you want to reopen investigations then go out and win an election.
baconswitchfarm is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 06:39 AM   #418
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 07:14 AM   #419
rastajenk
Just Deplorable
 
rastajenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,068
"Not a political bone in her body"? Now the defense of this travesty is just getting stupid. Why did she scrub her lefty social media identities of any countervailing evidence? How can you spend your entire adult life in academia and "not have a political bone in her body"? In psychology, no less.

Any one who supports this nonsense is absolutely deplorable, in the true sense of the word, not the Hillary interpretation of it.
rastajenk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2018, 08:00 AM   #420
woodtoo
Registered User
 
woodtoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
Christine's lawyer " Having my client testify under oath would be contrary to the purposes of discovering truth."
Dem logic.
woodtoo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.