Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
|
Not that I know what actually happened, but this was apparently an incomplete analysis.
I read a really good analysis that covered the fully history of the story including what was covered here recently. If I can find it again, I'll post it.
The gist is that the relationship between the Clintons, the uranium company, uranium company officials, the corrupt Russian company, political favors, and suspect contributions and possible payoffs goes way back.
It was stuff like this I extracted elsewhere.
"As noted in Clinton Cash and the New York Times, the Clintons helped Giustra acquire Kazakh uranium assets in 2005. Mukhtar Dzhakishev, then head of the Kazakh state nuclear agency, who met with the Clintons in Chappaqua, declared in 2010 that Hillary Clinton extorted and pressured Kazakh officials to grant those uranium concessions to Giustra. Shortly after they granted those concessions, $30 million was dropped into Clinton Foundation coffers by Giustra.
Smith never mentions any of this."
"Smith also fails to account for the fact that Uranium One’s Chairman Ian Telfer moved $2.3 million, much it undisclosed, to the Clinton Foundation as the deal was being reviewed by CFIUS. Furthermore, Smith falsely claims that the Clinton Foundation disclosed these donations to the charity but simply forgot to reveal the individual names of the donors. This is entirely false."
"But Smith is not done excluding key facts which confirm the timing of funds flowing to the Clintons. Smith also strangely omits the $500,000 speaking fee Bill Clinton was paid by a Russian bank involved with Uranium One during the review process."
