Quote:
Originally Posted by Grits
You're welcome, Cratos. I thought it was interesting. The key is to bring it to North America after its debut in Australia. Who knows, it may prove more accurate than Trackus.
|
From what I read, it sounds more accurate than Trakus at approximately 2" between horses and at 1000 measurements/second, but from my engineering experience with sensor technology I would believe that Trakus could duplicate or exceed those parameters.
However all of this would be for naught if someone doesn't develop the application software for such sophisticated data acquisition.
Excel and some of the other existing software packages might work to a certain extent, but I think an application package designed for horserace handicapping and compatible with the data would be better.