|
|
01-14-2018, 01:42 PM
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
I meant in general all you PA amateurish climatologist's crock
I know all mainstream sources are fake. Only Faux Noos and Anthony Watts preach the truth.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 01:51 PM
|
#92
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
I meant in general all you PA amateurish climatologist's crock
I know all mainstream sources are fake. Only Faux Noos and Anthony Watts preach the truth.
|
Remind us again what your credentials are in climatology. I, for one, must have missed that.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 03:40 PM
|
#93
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Remind us again what your credentials are in climatology. I, for one, must have missed that.
|
a devout follower of the Michael Mann cult?
https://www.steynonline.com/6333/mic...fier-and-fraud
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 04:31 PM
|
#94
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
|
Oh yeah...he's really hot stuff. More so than AGW itself.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 05:01 PM
|
#95
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Remind us again what your credentials are in climatology. I, for one, must have missed that.
|
He carries an umbrella.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 05:49 PM
|
#96
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
He carries an umbrella.
|
Gotta wonder how that has been working out for him in earthquakes, volcanoes, raging wildfires, tsunamis, rising oceans, etc.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 08:41 PM
|
#97
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckless
Looks like your typical millennial nitwit to me. We know the type. Childish dolts who think they are smarter than every one else on earth yet regularly prove how dumb they actually are, such as this clown photo and sign.
|
is that carrot top?
|
|
|
01-15-2018, 02:09 AM
|
#98
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Sorry. in the PA amateur non peer reviewed climate buffoons club vs NASA',and 97% of the actual scientific community
once again the buffoons lose their asses and are proud of their ignorance
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record. Data sources: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Met Office Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit and the Japanese Meteorological Agency.
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
....
Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record.
Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record. Data sources: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Met Office Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit and the Japanese Meteorological Agency.
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
AMERICAN and INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations....
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."
Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 01-18-2018 at 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
01-15-2018, 09:13 AM
|
#99
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
we're the same buffoons that are waiting for the 70's ice age. Which one is first in line now the ice age or global warming?
|
|
|
01-15-2018, 09:34 AM
|
#100
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
As usual. More totally unintelligible bullshit by ignorant Trumpeteers.
Man talk about fake news. You climate deniers make up a good portion of his low 30's seduced brown nosers and mindless hanger-ons.
Facts please instead of false contentions.
Last edited by hcap; 01-15-2018 at 09:37 AM.
|
|
|
01-15-2018, 09:48 AM
|
#101
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
|
Your premise is that warmer is bad.
Your premise not based on science at all.
Science is nietiher good not bad, it is science.
No value judgements have a place in science.
YES, it might be getting warmer, but NO it is neither good not bad.
Is just is.
"What is is?"
-------Billy-boy Clinton as he zipped up his pants.
You have no clue what higher life forms might come to be at +8?
OR +12?
You assume man is the top of the evolutionary ladder but can you prove it?
Maybe Man evolves into a stronger version, not as vulnerable to the elements, one who could continue evolution to other planets better that our current bodies could do.
Maybe dolphins are sitting on the cusp of ruling the world, just need a couple more degrees of fresh glacier water to seal the deal.
They have already started to train US!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-16-2018, 06:58 AM
|
#102
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
You assume man is the top of the evolutionary ladder but can you prove it?
Maybe Man evolves into a stronger version, not as vulnerable to the elements, one who could continue evolution to other planets better that our current bodies could do.
|
Or maybe we might De-evolve?
In which case banana dealers will do well. And to hell with damage and deaths from rising sea levels
and extreme weather.
Last edited by hcap; 01-16-2018 at 07:00 AM.
|
|
|
01-16-2018, 07:21 AM
|
#103
|
Just Deplorable
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,068
|
Weather is not climate, even when you put "extreme" in front of it.
Unless of course it suits your argument's needs, in which case weather can be climate.
I think I got it now...
|
|
|
01-16-2018, 07:33 AM
|
#104
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastajenk
Weather is not climate, even when you put "extreme" in front of it.
Unless of course it suits your argument's needs, in which case weather can be climate.
I think I got it now...
|
Faie enough although "extreme weather" can stem from abrupt climate change. Although humans will survive environmental change the unprecedented increasing rate of change over the last century indicates the increasing change will make it difficult for certain populations to adapt easily
https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/climate-ad...sea-level-rise
Quote:
Rising sea levels amplify the threat and magnitude of storm surges in coastal areas. Water infrastructure, often located along the coast or tidally-influenced water bodies, can be vulnerable to greater changes in storm surge intensity. The threat of flooding and damage to water infrastructure will continue to increase over time as sea levels rise and the magnitude of storms increase.
|
|
|
|
01-16-2018, 08:03 AM
|
#105
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Faie enough although "extreme weather" can stem from abrupt climate change. Although humans will survive environmental change the unprecedented increasing rate of change over the last century indicates the increasing change will make it difficult for certain populations to adapt easily
https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/climate-ad...sea-level-rise
|
Chill out. Stop with the hand-wringing, already. Sit back and savor a good hot cup of Columbian Java and enjoy its fragrant aroma. Whoever said adaptation or even evolution, for that matter, was easy? You're living proof that it's neither easy or even close to flawless -- but there you are, nonetheless, stuck on stupid in your perpetual role (assigned to you by Natural Selection, perhaps?) as Dr. Dolittle.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|