Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-30-2020, 05:50 PM   #31
mountainman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,668
Their programs and last second access boil down to blind-siding us with very sophisticated tote-corrections. In my opinion, the key is restricting your serious wagers to narrow situations in which your insights have an advantage over computers.
mountainman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-30-2020, 07:22 PM   #32
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Their programs and last second access boil down to blind-siding us with very sophisticated tote-corrections. In my opinion, the key is restricting your serious wagers to narrow situations in which your insights have an advantage over computers.
Very hard to do.....and fewer and fewer opportunities every day.

Damn impossible for weekend players
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-30-2020, 08:28 PM   #33
SG4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Why go through all THAT trouble and expense when you can just use computer algorithms to come up with last second wagers that are based on maximizing your perceived value bets across all wager types that will basically guarantee a profit after rebates are factored into the equation?

Who would NOT want to basically be a "casino" in that situation?

Who the hell needs unreliable or expensive connections to "get a beat on every horse in every race" when something like that is absolutely unnecessary for them to achieve their goals?

So I've wondered about this, are you of the opinion that computer teams are betting all races strictly off algorithms with no human input? There has to be some degree of human input and analysis on races loaded with first-time starters, or other situations that I assume would make a computer analysis lack value, right? These are the spots where I wonder how these teams compute & succeed.
SG4 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-30-2020, 08:29 PM   #34
mountainman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
Very hard to do.....and fewer and fewer opportunities every day.

Damn impossible for weekend players
Sad, but True.
mountainman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2020, 03:55 PM   #35
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Their programs and last second access boil down to blind-siding us with very sophisticated tote-corrections. In my opinion, the key is restricting your serious wagers to narrow situations in which your insights have an advantage over computers.
Like Lottery tickets?

At least you get better rides....
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2020, 08:20 PM   #36
SG4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 915
Del Mar's pick 6 pool seems excessively light today, only 174k with a carryover (a real carry, not a jackpot carry) of 53k, plus jackpot of 11k. I would've expected a carryover of that amount to bring in a new pool closer to 250k. I wonder if this is blow-back from low & mid-level players from what happened earlier in the week.
SG4 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-10-2020, 11:27 PM   #37
SG4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 915
Does anyone know which ADW's offer spreadsheet batch bet uploads to their customers? I know Twinspires had it as an option until their full site re-do earlier this year which unfortunately scrapped that availability. Something like that made available to the entire customer base without really needing any investment or programming knowledge could really be valuable if players wanted to try & mimic these computer players to some degree.
SG4 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-11-2020, 09:09 AM   #38
JerryBoyle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4 View Post
Does anyone know which ADW's offer spreadsheet batch bet uploads to their customers? I know Twinspires had it as an option until their full site re-do earlier this year which unfortunately scrapped that availability. Something like that made available to the entire customer base without really needing any investment or programming knowledge could really be valuable if players wanted to try & mimic these computer players to some degree.
AmWager does, and it's very fast. It's by far the fastest at processing bets as compared to any other ADW I've used.
JerryBoyle is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2020, 02:47 PM   #39
Ted Craven
Registered User
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 978
Agreed. Democratization of batch betting at the last minute for the little guy. Create a text file of (hundred of) wagers then upload it (e.g. from your spreadsheet or custom program). Or use their direct access API for ticket submission if you can program. Bigger syndicates probably don't use AmWager as much (better rebates elsewhere), but they're doing the same thing (API) - no more.

I place wagers this way within 20 seconds of post-time.

Ted
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ "The Modern Sartin Methodology" . . . . www.rdss2.com




Last edited by Ted Craven; 08-12-2020 at 02:48 PM.
Ted Craven is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2020, 08:50 PM   #40
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,642
I do not know how many betting interests there were on the day the bettor won, but a 545454 bet would be 8000 combinations.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2020, 01:30 AM   #41
ultracapper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
Why is that every time I learn some something new about Oaklawn I like it even more than that I did before? The management there must be very good. Absent some disaster, Oaklawn has a shot to become the "go to" track for serious players.
Need turf
ultracapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2020, 09:22 AM   #42
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultracapper View Post
Need turf
Not me.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2020, 01:20 PM   #43
metro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
Not me.
I agree, refreshing to still have a major track with races exclusively on dirt.
metro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2020, 04:06 PM   #44
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by metro View Post
I agree, refreshing to still have a major track with races exclusively on dirt.
Aside from just being more experienced as a dirt player and not enjoying races with a lot of first time turf horses, one of the biggest problems I have with turf is track bias. If a track splits its card between dirt and turf you often don't have enough of a sample on either surface to figure out if there was a bias. If you can see 9-10 races on the same surface, you can usually figure out what was going on.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2020, 04:15 PM   #45
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
Aside from just being more experienced as a dirt player and not enjoying races with a lot of first time turf horses, one of the biggest problems I have with turf is track bias. If a track splits its card between dirt and turf you often don't have enough of a sample on either surface to figure out if there was a bias. If you can see 9-10 races on the same surface, you can usually figure out what was going on.
Agree, spot on. Same goes for figure making. Throw in some places with multiple turf courses and figures get less and less reliable.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.