Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-24-2018, 08:01 PM   #1
FakeNameChanged
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,176
Calibration Handicapping the Travers

Calibration Hcp-ing(Plus) on the Travers-G1-1-1/4M
----------------------------------------T/M-----Str-------AbT-------LP-----E2---(LP+E2)
Trigger Warning 30/1 ML------1.5------0--------23.3------97-------93----(190)

Wonder Gadot 5/1 ML--------0-----3.25-----24.4--------99-------72----(171)

Gronkowski 4/1 ML-----------6------¼------24.0--------98------110----(208)*

Bravazo 12/1 ML----------2-------1------24.1----------97----99-----(196)

Vino Rosso 10/1 ML---------3-----5.75----24.1---------97-----85------(182)

Meistermind 30/1 ML--------0-------0------24.2---------83-----94------(177)

King Zachary 15/1 ML-------0-------1.25----23.3-------100-----83-----(183)

Mendelssohn 12/1 ML------0----------0-----24.0-------83--------99----(182)

Good Magic 2/1 ML---------2----------0------24.1------99------103----(202)

Tenfold 8/1 ML ------------0----------0-------24.4------85------99------(184)

Catholic Boy 8/1 ML-------0----------0-----24.0T----92T-----89------(181)Turf

The & had gains on the Turn(T/M)
Of these with a T/M, the also had moves in the stretch. Calibr. Hcp. says to use Final fractions to separate contenders, but I labeled it AbT because he shows examples using the 6f-4f times for consistency. I think using LP from Bris is probably a better number. To further separate them I added the (E2+ LP) to get a number that considers the early pace plus Late pace.
So here’s how our contenders stack up
Trigger Warning----1.5 T/M -------0 SM-----97LP + 93E2-----190
Gronkowki----------6.0 T/M------- 0 SM----98LP + 110E2----208*
Bravazo --------------2.0 T/M-------1 SM-----97 LP + 99E2----196
Vino Rosso--------3.0 T/M----5-3/4 SM-----97 LP + 85E2----182
Good Magic--------2.0 T/M--------0 SM-----99 LP + 103E2----202

I believe Jim Lehane said to use a 2-3 point advantage (or ⅖-⅗) as a decider on separating contenders. We only have a 2 point difference in LP over 5 contenders. So I added in the E2 and it appears that Gronkowski comes in at 208 total points, although his last race was 77 days ago, still within the 90 day range but outside 45. He does have six workouts with 4 of them at 5f. Good Magic comes in at 202 total points and raced 27 days ago. I used his 2 pt. LP advantage over , although Gronk's total pts. was better.-toss up.

Using the top combined numbers on the contenders it looks like with and fighting for the 4th spot. If being a dual qualifier(T/M & SM) counts for anything, then and might be good price plays. While 's E2 of 85 appears suspect, he shows several better E2's in prev. races. Okay, so that’s my interpretation of Calibration Handicapping on the Travers.
__________________
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
FakeNameChanged is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-25-2018, 09:39 PM   #2
FakeNameChanged
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,176
Congrats to anyone picking Catholic Boy. I saw that GaryG picked him cold. Favorites at Sar managed to win 5 out of 13 races today, even if the two top choices ran 8th and 9th in the Travers. Catholic Boy ran 2f fractions of: 23.3-24.3-24.0-25.0-24.3. Last fraction matched his 2nd fraction to 4f.
__________________
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

Last edited by FakeNameChanged; 08-25-2018 at 09:51 PM.
FakeNameChanged is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-25-2018, 10:28 PM   #3
Nitro
Registered User
 
Nitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 18,970
I didn't have Catholic Boy as one of my top Keys, but the Exacta box with one of my Keys (Mendelssohn) turned out to be very rewarding.
Although the odds were significantly different, the tote analysis showed nearly equal value ratings on both Good Magic & Mendelssohn. Catholic Boy did take some late action at 2 mins to post.

http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/s...d.php?t=146953
Nitro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-26-2018, 02:22 PM   #4
CheckMark
 
CheckMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Fergus,ON
Posts: 3,720
I was kicking myself today because I noticed that was ridden by the same jockey twice and also I thought was going to improve off of 2 poor starts. Should of done not . was crap, no movements and was no where to be seen. I guess I should go with my gut for handicapping from now on and I have years down the road (since in 16) to improve my game.
__________________
Handicapping the world year round'
-Conley
CheckMark is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.