Hillary Clinton

[chadk66]

Snopes

[EasyGoer89]

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt

I wonder why Jesse Jackson is asking Obama to give Hillary a preemptive pardon?

Isn't this the race baiting huckster who has a son who is a criminal?

[Greyfox]

Even her donors don't trust her...now.

"Clinton’s biggest backers want a “campaign autopsy,” which could expose Clinton’s entire operation. The donors are demanding to know where Clinton spent the near $1.5 billion in campaign resources she collected in the closing months. They want the receipts. They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data."


https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/i...-her-campaign/

[PaceAdvantage]

Easy explanation....they bought their own bullshit until it was too late to do anything about it...then she spent like a drunken sailor in a desperate attempt after realizing, hey, we might actually lose this thing.

Or something like that.

[fast4522]

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt

I wonder why Jesse Jackson is asking Obama to give Hillary a preemptive pardon?

That was just to get in front of a live microphone, lack of media equals death in his mind.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Just saw a poll that stated 67% of Dems and Independents don't want Hillary to run again in 2020.

1) For the Dems on this board, would you like Hillary to run again in 2020???

2) Is she even considering such a bid???

It wasn't in the poll, but I assume 100% of Reps would like to see her run again.

[Greyfox]

Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike

Just saw a poll that stated 67% of Dems and Independents don't want Hillary to run again in 2020.

From what I've seen and read, I don't think that her health would permit another run.
As it was, surrogates were standing in for her more often than not since the Primary Convention.

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike

Just saw a poll that stated 67% of Dems and Independents don't want Hillary to run again in 2020.

1) For the Dems on this board, would you like Hillary to run again in 2020???

2) Is she even considering such a bid???

It wasn't in the poll, but I assume 100% of Reps would like to see her run again.

I don't know if the easy victory is worth seeing her face plastered all over the place during the campaign. Watching all the media and her supporters ball their eyes out on election night might be worth it though.

[woodtoo]

"Out, out get er out and take her coat!!"

[Parkview_Pirate]

Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike

Just saw a poll that stated 67% of Dems and Independents don't want Hillary to run again in 2020.

1) For the Dems on this board, would you like Hillary to run again in 2020???

2) Is she even considering such a bid???

It wasn't in the poll, but I assume 100% of Reps would like to see her run again.

This story has Hillary at 20-1 and Michelle Obummer at 12-1 for winning(?) in 2020.

http://www.thewrap.com/21-contenders...dds-photos/29/

Personally, I'd lay good money down that Hillary will be a widow within 2 years, and I'd give her about 1 in 4 chance of pushing up daisies herself by 2020....

[Parkview_Pirate]

Originally Posted by FantasticDan

Whether it's a political claim or an urban legend or whatever, every assessment that Snopes does is broken down in detail, there for all to see. Everything about the claim is examined.. origin, background, substantiating facts, all of it..

This recent trend of claiming that Snopes isn't believable or has an agenda is just more of the same toddler-response from the right where any result that's not to their liking must be because of fixing, bias, conspiracy, etc etc etc

You need to go to a solid, truthful site like Zerohedge to get the low-down on Snopes, reporting via the always factual Daily Mail:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...ries-actual-wh

Facebook has announced plans to check for 'fake news' using a series of organizations to assess whether stories are true

One of them is a website called Snopes.com which claims to be one of the web's 'essential resources' and 'painstaking, scholarly and reliable'

It was founded by husband-and-wife Barbara and David Mikkelson, who used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to start their research

Now they are divorced - with Barbara claiming in legal documents he embezzled $98,000 of company money and spent it on 'himself and prostitutes'

In a lengthy and bitter legal dispute he is claiming to be underpaid and demanding 'industry standard' or at least $360,000 a year

The two also dispute what are basic facts of their case - despite Snopes.com saying its 'ownership' is committed to 'accuracy and impartiality'

Snopes.com founder David Mikkelson's new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as an administrator

She has worked as an escort and porn actress and despite claims website is non-political ran as a Libertarian for Congress on a 'Dump Bush' platform

Its main 'fact checker' is Kimberly LaCapria, whose blog 'ViceVixen' says she is in touch with her 'domme side' and has posted on Snopes.com while smoking pot


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4TbrIZDlf
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

That story is so bizarre it must be true....

[NJ Stinks]

Originally Posted by Parkview_Pirate

You need to go to a solid, truthful site like Zerohedge to get the low-down on Snopes, reporting via the always factual Daily Mail:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...ries-actual-wh



That story is so bizarre it must be true....

I would only believe it if the source was the New York Post....

[zico20]

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt

I don't know if the easy victory is worth seeing her face plastered all over the place during the campaign. Watching all the media and her supporters ball their eyes out on election night might be worth it though.

Better to look at her face than Al Franken's for months. There is one guy I despise even more than Hillary. Just look at him in Trading Places. He looks like a real doofus.

[barahona44]

Originally Posted by zico20

Better to look at her face than Al Franken's for months. There is one guy I despise even more than Hillary. Just look at him in Trading Places. He looks like a real doofus.

Um, it's called ACTING.He was playing a doofus character, the train baggage handler, to advance the plot.Franken graduated cum laude from Harvard. He says he is not planning on running for president in 2020.

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by barahona44

Um, it's called ACTING.He was playing a doofus character, the train baggage handler, to advance the plot.Franken graduated cum laude from Harvard. He says he is not planning on running for president in 2020.

Worst scenes ever.........ruined movie