Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
I think I referred to the 2018 Dwyer as the Independence Day Massacre.
|
Yea. If anyone still could not form there own opinion, outside of the narrative, social-proof, and authority, - then they don't have the competence and psychology to form a competent opinion, and really should not be jumping on the bandwagon now.
We had an obvious PED situation, and in that instance we also had a major, significant betting coup.
A few people here called it out, when it happened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer after the obvious incident
Horse moves up from "Should be running ungraded stakes and OC races at 1-turn[/B]"[/I], to IS NOW TO BE CONSIDERED THE DIVISION LEADER, while he moves down from "Hey I think we have a consensus here that he should be 6-1 he may improve going 1-turn and his trainer is rather hot" to 5/2 SUCKERS! in the last 30 seconds = significant/legitimate topic of concern
... the bold act that we saw in broad daylight on a relatively big stage. ...
|
I saw a PED horse run well yesterday. There are 10+ major operations who use PEDs on most horses. Multiple others who only use PEDs in spots.
Not every operation even participates in the betting. For some it's all the ownership business and the purse money.
The Dwyer was ABJECT in that it did involve the parimutuel pools, and it was a brazen act on a big stage.