|
|
05-19-2023, 03:01 PM
|
#466
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
it sure is.
But the amount of time the people took at the computer screen is not relevant.
I can check a signature in 3 seconds no problem.
So what's next?
|
I disagree. But again to really get to the answer, get a team of handwriting experts to check random lots of ballots. That would settle the issue once and for all.
And big deal on your 3-second speed level. Evidently, there are people much faster than you. A 2-second checker would be 50% than you. Maybe you should take a speeding reading course...or two.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
05-19-2023, 03:08 PM
|
#467
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Why can't we just agree that if you count...
One One Thousand
Two One Thousand
Three One Thousand
you know whether a signature matches...that's a LONG TIME for your brain to determine whether a signature matches or doesn't match.
So if we all can agree with that...why is it being brought up in court?
it's a LOSING BATTLE...period...and they are wasting time on this?
What is wrong with Republicans? Seriously...they might be as stupid as the left claims.
|
|
|
05-19-2023, 03:54 PM
|
#468
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 256
|
I'm with Pace that the 3 second thing is nothing. I'm not sure how long people think it should take but it's always been pretty quick where I vote. My question is has anyone involved with these ballots said they didn't vote? People are talking about how quick they checked signatures but I assume they've brought people in to say they didn't sign these and that's what they really need.
|
|
|
05-19-2023, 10:53 PM
|
#470
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lex
I'm with Pace that the 3 second thing is nothing. I'm not sure how long people think it should take but it's always been pretty quick where I vote. My question is has anyone involved with these ballots said they didn't vote? People are talking about how quick they checked signatures but I assume they've brought people in to say they didn't sign these and that's what they really need.
|
some are not even actual people or people living in AZ, others are in nursing homes with cognitive problems
a better thing would check if these voters actually exist.
it takes longer than 3 seconds to punch in the voters name to compare signatures.
|
|
|
05-20-2023, 08:55 PM
|
#471
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
|
Just sayin'.......
Kari Lake might get matters going in her favor IF.......
she would spend a little less time plugged in to that BDE.
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
|
|
|
05-20-2023, 09:04 PM
|
#472
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
|
Long a laugh stock in Phoenix, she has turned off many of her own backers with this nonsense
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
05-20-2023, 09:20 PM
|
#473
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses
Kari Lake might get matters going in her favor IF.......
she would spend a little less time plugged in to that BDE.
|
big dick energy?
What does Dick Cheney have to do with this?
|
|
|
05-20-2023, 09:28 PM
|
#474
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal
Long a laugh stock in Phoenix, she has turned off many of her own backers with this nonsense
|
are you a backer ?
if she EXPOSES how rampantly cheating the dimwits and Zuckerbuck funded training are, she will have won.
|
|
|
05-22-2023, 08:30 PM
|
#475
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,813
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
In all honesty, how long would it take you to check signatures on a computer screen....I would say 2-3 seconds would be enough, actually...
1
2
3
Yeah...I could easily check to see if a signature matched in 3 seconds...it doesn't take long
|
Watch the video
https://www.westernjournal.com/lake-...ust-set-aside/
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
05-22-2023, 08:55 PM
|
#476
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Posts: 12,716
|
I bet it would take more than 3 seconds to verify my signature. I have carpal tunnel bouts that make it hard to write. I leave notes to myself to circumvent memory issues from being an insomniac battling a concussion. I often look at the notes and cannot read them.
|
|
|
05-23-2023, 01:55 AM
|
#477
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph
|
The vast majority of signatures are going to match...probably takes about a second when that is the case...no?
Yes that person is flying through them...but even still...do you think that's some sort of winning argument in court based off the video? I don't.
|
|
|
05-23-2023, 06:12 AM
|
#478
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
The vast majority of signatures are going to match...probably takes about a second when that is the case...no?
Yes that person is flying through them...but even still...do you think that's some sort of winning argument in court based off the video? I don't.
|
signature verification is subjective.
when i sign the voters book here in jersey, my signature looks nothing like it did 32 years ago when in registered in Morris county.
the people conducting the election dont even look at it.
Allan
|
|
|
05-23-2023, 08:45 AM
|
#479
|
Gambler
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Katy Texas
Posts: 544
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggestal99
signature verification is subjective.
when i sign the voters book here in jersey, my signature looks nothing like it did 32 years ago when in registered in Morris county.
the people conducting the election dont even look at it.
Allan
|
I believe that where you vote a picture ID is required to vote in person, so the signature is not that important. The problem in Arizona is not with in person voting. Mail in and Harvested votes are what the Lake campaign is complaining about.
__________________
$MONEY$
|
|
|
05-23-2023, 10:31 AM
|
#480
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
It's kind of amazing how lax some people are towards protecting "our precious democracy" and it's most vital component...voting.
The people who want to make it virtually impossible to obtain a constitutionally protected firearm are the very same people who want to make it incredibly easy to cheat the very same constitutionally protected right to vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|