 |
|
10-27-2020, 09:39 PM
|
#61
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baystater
Posts: 3,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
We know Trump’s going to cheat. But we are going to vote, legally and in such numbers that it won’t matter. Voter suppression tactics won’t matter. A biased and politicized Supreme Court won’t matter. A corrupt, racist and misogynist Trump won’t matter.
|
Biden could sure use a few of you at his rallies.
|
|
|
|
10-27-2020, 09:46 PM
|
#62
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Wait wait wait...
First it was easy but now its hard because it costs money?
Its not like Hillary and the DNC didn't have limitless funds in 2016. She can't take the money with her, money was no object, period. How much does it cost to "find" 12k votes in Michigan Mike? Is so ****ing easy right...?
But fine...
How about winning a state? Wouldn't it be easier to win Florida with Gillum? How about Georgia without a guy who knows how influence elections like Kemp?
Why not cheat there? I'm sure its way cheaper...
This is that dumb shit Mike and I used to think you were brighter than this. Trump has made a moron out of you.
|
Oh no, you used to think I was brighter...whatever shall I do? 
You keep believing in your fairy tales and vote Biden/Harris...hell..vote Dem down the line like your hero Bill Kristol.
That will show us idiots who's the boss.
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2020, 10:00 PM
|
#63
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Oh no, you used to think I was brighter...whatever shall I do?
You keep believing in your fairy tales and vote Biden/Harris...hell..vote Dem down the line like your hero Bill Kristol.
That will show us idiots who's the boss. |
Keep peddling this stupid shit and I'll keep calling you a dumbass.
"BuT iT Is ExPeNsIvE!!!"
MFer... she outspent him 2 to 1.
Money. Was. No. Object.
If she could have just cheated and won she ****ing would have...
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 12:37 AM
|
#64
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Dude....as if she was calling those shots.
And even if she were, her massive ego probably got in the way. She never thought she was going to lose (until it was too late).
You can't set up this kind of operation at the last minute...if she thought she was in trouble late...welp...too bad.
You really think it's impossible to throw an election if you have enough money and motivation?
Come on, man. They were throwing elections back in the 60s. Imagine how much easier it would be today.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 02:17 AM
|
#65
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,988
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Come on, man. They were throwing elections back in the 60s. Imagine how much easier it would be today.
|
WAY easier to cheat at virtually anything back in the 60’s. Think about it.
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 03:09 AM
|
#66
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave
WAY easier to cheat at virtually anything back in the 60’s. Think about it.
|
Really? Everyone's afraid of hackers. Break into your bank account...break into this...break into that.
With all the electronic voting machines and vote tallies...combined with way more mail-in ballots this year...you really think it was easier back then than today?
Come on, man.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 07:34 AM
|
#67
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Dude....as if she was calling those shots.
And even if she were, her massive ego probably got in the way. She never thought she was going to lose (until it was too late).
You can't set up this kind of operation at the last minute...if she thought she was in trouble late...welp...too bad.
You really think it's impossible to throw an election if you have enough money and motivation?
Come on, man. They were throwing elections back in the 60s. Imagine how much easier it would be today.
|
If she could have cheated and gotten away with it she would have... pointblankperiod.
If you can break the rules and get away with it you do it. People demonstrate this behavior everyday of our ****ing lives. Unless you want to take the position Hillary and the democrats are better human beings than the average person and I don't think you do...
So now we're into your favorite "secret cabal" trope.
So let me get this straight, a secret cabal, even more removed from scrutiny than the candidate herself, with limitless money, decided not to ensure victory because... reasons?
Did they decide this at the secret cabal pizza social?
Do you realize how batshit you sound?
Go watch more Tucker... its paying dividends for you.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 07:36 AM
|
#68
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Really? Everyone's afraid of hackers. Break into your bank account...break into this...break into that.
With all the electronic voting machines and vote tallies...combined with way more mail-in ballots this year...you really think it was easier back then than today?
Come on, man.
|
It was so ****ing easy they didn't do it right?
Hillary, the big bad for the past 20 years, had it easy... she could have cheated but didn't.
The more you post the dumber you sound.
The woman has a BODY COUNT for ****s sake!
Last edited by elysiantraveller; 10-28-2020 at 07:39 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 08:16 AM
|
#69
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,058
|
Trump is re-elected if he wins any one of PA, MI or WI and holds every state that he won in 2016 (including the 1 electoral vote in ME and all 5 electoral votes in NE) . . . certainly not an outlandish scenario since he won all 3 of those states in 2016 . . . if the one state is WI, he has exactly 270 electoral for victory . . . just imagine the heads exploding from that result
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 08:29 AM
|
#70
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor Ekman
Trump is re-elected if he wins any one of PA, MI or WI and holds every state that he won in 2016 (including the 1 electoral vote in ME and all 5 electoral votes in NE) . . . certainly not an outlandish scenario since he won all 3 of those states in 2016 . . . if the one state is WI, he has exactly 270 electoral for victory . . . just imagine the heads exploding from that result
|
I made it for you.
Z
I do agree that this is probably his only path at this time. Its also his EC Ceiling. I don't see any way he does better than this.
Of note:
If he loses AZ that NE2 Vote becomes essential to him forcing a tie.
Explains his stop there.
Last edited by elysiantraveller; 10-28-2020 at 08:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 09:30 AM
|
#71
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
It was so ****ing easy they didn't do it right?
|
Exactly.
It's the same reason many people don't bother to vote every year in the first place. They figure "it's a lock, so why bother."
It's called stupid human decisions that turn into lifelong regrets. 
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 09:36 AM
|
#72
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Go watch more Tucker... its paying dividends for you.
|
Curious...when was the last time Tucker proposed the 2016 election was/wasn't fixed, or that 2020 would be?
BTW, you might be right. Maybe Clinton and her machine DID fix the vote...and he still won.
That's a scary thought...maybe all hope isn't lost in 2020 after all.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 10:13 AM
|
#73
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Exactly.
It's the same reason many people don't bother to vote every year in the first place. They figure "it's a lock, so why bother."
It's called stupid human decisions that turn into lifelong regrets. |
But it wasn't a lock.
Again what you say makes absolutely no sense.
You know it doesn't but you don't care because you're too fragile of a person to challenge your priors.
According to you Hillary is simultaneously the most corrupt politician ever but also decided to play the election straight up because...
She has to...
To protect your precarious view of how the world works.
Peak snowflake.
Last edited by elysiantraveller; 10-28-2020 at 10:14 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 10:16 AM
|
#74
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
But it wasn't a lock.
Again what you say makes absolutely no sense.
You know it doesn't but you don't care because you're too fragile of a person to challenge your priors.
According to you Hillary is simultaneously the most corrupt politician ever but also decided to play the election straight up because...
She has to...
To protect your precarious view of how the world works.
Peak snowflake.
|
When did I ever say Hillary is the most corrupt politician ever? Pretty sure I never said that.
You must be slipping.
There are far more corrupt politicians roaming the land
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2020, 10:19 AM
|
#75
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Oh, and now the vast majority of people in the USA didn't think 2016 was a lock for Hillary...
What was the percentage chance of winning listed on the NYT website just prior to election night?
Come on, man.
The general consensus was that she was a lock. Period.
Shall we replay all the shocked looks on everyone's faces when the final call was made?
"Even Trump himself looks shocked and looks like he doesn't know what to do next...he really didn't want to win...he just wanted to run to promote himself..."
ely revises history...again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
@
