Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


View Poll Results: Who Offers the Best PPs
Equibase 70 9.07%
Brisnet 443 57.38%
DRF 259 33.55%
Voters: 772. This poll is closed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 13 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 10-27-2011, 07:36 AM   #91
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
Why can't they just use a number for trainers and jockeys?

5670945 would be the same person no matter how you spell his name, of if she gets married, or whatever.

I can see it now..."Come on 3495683, you friggin' anchor - whip that horse!"
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-30-2011, 02:02 PM   #92
mrhorseplayer
Registered User
 
mrhorseplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,972
I like the Bris, has more stats, ep and lp, track bias
mrhorseplayer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-31-2011, 09:09 PM   #93
vegasone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 531
In order to get the right number they would have to spell the name right...?? It is a lot better than it was years ago...not perfect tho
vegasone is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-01-2011, 03:50 AM   #94
takeout
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,184
It is a lot better than it used to be. The drf file never got totally synced up with Equibase though. Still a few minor differences after almost two decades.
takeout is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-11-2011, 07:05 AM   #95
Dark Horse
Registered User
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: route 66
Posts: 1,112
DRF for me. But only for fast and firm tracks. If I would use speed figures predictively I would use Sartin. But to convert my own grading method into a speed projection for each horse Beyers are best.

By the way, DRF doesn't have a very good commercial understanding, imo. If you want to hook people into your numbers, give them free access to historical data for research and backtesting. Fine to charge for the form, but outside of that give away as much info for free as possible. That will only make people more dependent on Beyer figures. The power of the information age lies in the effortless ability to reach a huge audience. By charging for everything, DRF caters only to the narrowest market. Everything about them feels dinosaurish. They should borrow a page from Amazon and Facebook business models.
Dark Horse is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-11-2011, 07:22 AM   #96
Cholly
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 946
By the way, DRF doesn't have a very good commercial understanding, imo. If you want to hook people into your numbers, give them free access to historical data for research and backtesting. Fine to charge for the form, but outside of that give away as much info for free as possible. That will only make people more dependent on Beyer figures. The power of the information age lies in the effortless ability to reach a huge audience. By charging for everything, DRF caters only to the narrowest market. Everything about them feels dinosaurish. They should borrow a page from Amazon and Facebook business models.[/QUOTE]

Spot on, mate!

But it ain't just the industry's bible that strikes "dinosaurish"--the industry itself has that arc of General Motors from the 70's on.
Cholly is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-11-2011, 07:32 AM   #97
raybo
EXCEL with SUPERFECTAS
 
raybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Horse
DRF for me. But only for fast and firm tracks. If I would use speed figures predictively I would use Sartin. But to convert my own grading method into a speed projection for each horse Beyers are best.

By the way, DRF doesn't have a very good commercial understanding, imo. If you want to hook people into your numbers, give them free access to historical data for research and backtesting. Fine to charge for the form, but outside of that give away as much info for free as possible. That will only make people more dependent on Beyer figures. The power of the information age lies in the effortless ability to reach a huge audience. By charging for everything, DRF caters only to the narrowest market. Everything about them feels dinosaurish. They should borrow a page from Amazon and Facebook business models.
I agree, all the raw data should be free, they should only charge for data that is truly their own proprietary data.

However, who's going to pay for the basic raw data that they all must obtain first? That initial cost is passed to the end user now. Should that, instead, be absorbed by the providers as cost of doing business? Doubt that will ever happen.
__________________
Ray
Horseracing's like the stock market except you don't have to wait as long to go broke.

Excel Spreadsheet Handicapping Forum

Charter Member: Horseplayers Association of North America

Last edited by raybo; 12-11-2011 at 07:34 AM.
raybo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-11-2011, 09:12 AM   #98
jerry-g
Registered User
 
jerry-g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lecanto, Florida
Posts: 740
Cool

I get all the BRIS ultimate past performances for free. One way is I download the PDF file from the trainers web site. If he has a horse running today in a track I like, then it is a free pop. The other way is to download the Bris Race of the Day pdf. Last, my Twinspires account allows me to download a full card at any track for free if I bet at least one race on the card. I like to get from different tracks each day. Usually I get 7-10 files to handicap. I really like the folks at BRIS for being so helpful to handicappers with all their free information on the site. Tons of articles with lots of insights into handicapping a race which is all for free. They are in what is called their Library.
jerry-g is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-12-2011, 06:00 PM   #99
Dark Horse
Registered User
 
Dark Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: route 66
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by raybo
I agree, all the raw data should be free, they should only charge for data that is truly their own proprietary data.

However, who's going to pay for the basic raw data that they all must obtain first? That initial cost is passed to the end user now. Should that, instead, be absorbed by the providers as cost of doing business? Doubt that will ever happen.
They're missing out on the dynamic nature of the information age. The new business model may be too shocking for wrinkled heads. Give away as much information as possible. This creates goodwill and a large following. That goodwill in turn creates brand loyalty, and in this case dependency on Beyer figures. So in return for their initial generosity they get loyalty, greater following, and dependency by that loyal increased following. A good trade!

The choice before me, for instance, is to pay 1K or 2K for past data and thereby speed up the project I'm working on (conversion of projected form of day to speed figure), or go slower in developing that conversion scale. If I choose the slower pace, DRF gains nothing from me. But if they gave away the info I need, I'd be able to play more races, and would therefore be buying more of their forms, etc. In either case they end up with nothing for the old data (which I either don't buy or get for free), but in the latter case they hooked me. It just requires a more fluid longterm vision from them.

Last edited by Dark Horse; 12-12-2011 at 06:06 PM.
Dark Horse is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-27-2012, 12:59 PM   #100
redshift1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,194
Noticed this site recently which appears to be an offshoot of Equibase.



http://www.thoroughbredanalytics.com/
redshift1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-27-2012, 11:39 PM   #101
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by redshift1
Noticed this site recently which appears to be an offshoot of Equibase.
It's not an offshoot if you mean they are somehow owned or run by EB. This site simply pays Equibase to use its data in their product.
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-28-2012, 01:16 AM   #102
redshift1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,194
Right you are.

http://www.thoroughbredanalytics.com/resources/
redshift1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2012, 08:27 AM   #103
sammy the sage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central fla.
Posts: 4,874
no sample BEFORE purchase...no chance here...or w/most people...
__________________
got handed a lemon...make lemonade....add sugar or brown sugar or stevia or my personal favorite....miracle fruit....google it...thank me later...
sammy the sage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2012, 02:27 PM   #104
MightBeSosa
Veteran
 
MightBeSosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 515
NO Equibase PP'S on any of the trainer/sire sites as of today.

wtf
MightBeSosa is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2012, 03:22 PM   #105
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightBeSosa
NO Equibase PP'S on any of the trainer/sire sites as of today.

wtf
yea, I don't see any after yesterday other than a few sparse sire pps.

hopefully they are just making a change or having an issue.

I use the charts anyway but it is nice to have, and I'm sure it is good for handle. I canceled my bris account after that "free" special they ran a while back for one of their PP types and wrote on the website "be sure not to download after X" so I downloaded all before X date from that screen and they charged me for some stupid charlestown race because it was from a PREVIOUS week on the same download screen with no warning.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.