Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyC
I did read it and saw this line, “Not getting a response on being able to see the plays of the competitors that I thought may have committed some improprieties is disconcerting,”. So I will admit that he tried to do some research to figure out what happened but without evidence he was merely voicing an opinion on what he thought happened.
|
Yes, Peters "tried to do some research"...and I think he did a more thorough "investigative job" than the tournament authorities did...in spite of the limited data at his disposal. Which is what I stated in my initial post here...which you found disagreement with.
When the "hard evidence" of a case is supressed...then, even the thorough investigator must ultimately just "voice an opinion on what he thinks happened".