|
|
10-10-2017, 02:25 PM
|
#76
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
If a woman is raped, reports it, but does not name her accuser....and the rapist goes on to rape someone else would you call her a snowflake? Would you think she is to blame?
No one knows why victims don't report things, but it seems pretty short sighted to me as a man to try and discredit a victim.
Unfortunately you've even turned this into a right/left thing as I'm sure you and your ilk are still mad at Judd for taking swipes at your boy toy. That's why you view this like you do.
Snowflakes...
|
Judd was sexually harassed, not raped. Let's stick to the facts.
Judd came out with her story in 2015 in Vanity Fair:
"Judd told Variety’s Ramin Setoodeh about her harassment at length as a part of the publication’s Power of Women issue in 2015. Though she declined to give his name, the actress went in-depth on the nature of the harassment:"
So I ask again...why did protect her harasser? She's strong enough to take on the President in public but can't name Harvey Weinstein?
Who exactly did she save from harm when she named Trump? Who could she have saved if she had named Weinstein?
See where I'm going? I know that you do...but you'll never admit when you're wrong.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:27 PM
|
#77
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
Like I said....this is about her politics with you. Plain and simple.
|
Her politics shows her not to be a snowflake. It shows her to be a strong woman who will stand up for what she believes in, even if it's the President of the USA.
But ol' Harvey Weinstein...
And it's not like she's ashamed...she talked IN DETAIL about her harassment, but refused to name him. I keep asking why. You guys keep coming back with stuff that doesn't apply. If she hadn't told her story at all, then you'd have a point.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:28 PM
|
#78
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Now that Hollywood has thrown Weinstein officially under the bus, due to the comments by her royal highness Meryl Streep, who does this benefit the most? Doesn't Hollywood fear that Weinstein may threaten to drop names of others who were sexual predators as well, to save his sorry ass?.....Or is this a preemptive diversion for some kind of impending breaking news to come possibly out of the WH(Pizzagate)?
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:31 PM
|
#79
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
I have but one question for BaffertsWig and Dahoss.
Do you think, for one nanosecond, that if we replace the name Harvey Weinstein with Donald Trump, that Judd would have still kept his name under wraps?
Case closed.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:37 PM
|
#80
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
I have but one question for BaffertsWig and Dahoss.
Do you think, for one nanosecond, that if we replace the name Harvey Weinstein with Donald Trump, that Judd would have still kept his name under wraps?
Case closed.
|
I can't answer that question because I am not Ashley Judd and do not share that/those unfortunate experience(s) with her.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:37 PM
|
#81
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Judd was sexually harassed, not raped. Let's stick to the facts.
Judd came out with her story in 2015 in Vanity Fair:
"Judd told Variety’s Ramin Setoodeh about her harassment at length as a part of the publication’s Power of Women issue in 2015. Though she declined to give his name, the actress went in-depth on the nature of the harassment:"
So I ask again...why did protect her harasser? She's strong enough to take on the President in public but can't name Harvey Weinstein?
Who exactly did she save from harm when she named Trump? Who could she have saved if she had named Weinstein?
See where I'm going? I know that you do...but you'll never admit when you're wrong.
|
I admit I was wrong when I called you fair.
I never said she was raped....but you see where I'm going. I know that you do...but you'll never admit when you're wrong.
It's ALL about politics with you. You're mad at Judd because she called out your man crush. You don't need to admit it, but obviously that's why you're commenting.
Sad that politics are making you victim blame.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:39 PM
|
#82
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
Sad that politics are making you victim blame.
|
Politics is definitely skewing somebody's thought process, but it ain't mine.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:41 PM
|
#83
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
I have but one question for BaffertsWig and Dahoss.
Do you think, for one nanosecond, that if we replace the name Harvey Weinstein with Donald Trump, that Judd would have still kept his name under wraps?
Case closed.
|
I don't know. That's the truth.
I have a question for you. If it wasn't Ashley Judd, who we both you know you have an issue with, would you be acting like this?
Since you seem to think you know why she didn't name him....why don't you just say it. I'm curious why you think she didn't name him.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:43 PM
|
#84
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Politics is definitely skewing somebody's thought process, but it ain't mine.
|
DENIAL
Are you going to pretend you don't have an issue with Judd for what she said about Trump?
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:43 PM
|
#85
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
Like you, I have no idea why she didn't name him, given all the other facts in place.
There could be a huge number of reasons.
I would think a woman who could get up in front of a large crowd and tear the President a new asshole would have ZERO problem naming her sexual harasser...especially after she had revealed the harassment publicly and was already an established actor.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:45 PM
|
#86
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Like you, I have no idea why she didn't name him, given all the other facts in place.
There could be a huge number of reasons.
I would think a woman who could get up in front of a large crowd and tear the President a new asshole would have ZERO problem naming her sexual harasser...especially after she had revealed the harassment publicly and was already an established actor.
|
Notice you avoided my question. It's cool. I think most people can see what this is about.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:46 PM
|
#87
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Like you, I have no idea why she didn't name him, given all the other facts in place.
There could be a huge number of reasons.
I would think a woman who could get up in front of a large crowd and tear the President a new asshole would have ZERO problem naming her sexual harasser...especially after she had revealed the harassment publicly and was already an established actor.
|
Is it possible that even though she was an established star she felt this guy had enough clout in the industry to end her career. Women all over the world face this decision on a daily basis. Guy is a scum and he deserves everything coming to him.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:47 PM
|
#88
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
It's interesting she may have thought Weinstein could end her career, but the President of the United States has zero ability to mess with her life.
Good stuff boys.
Doesn't add up using conventional math...that's the problem. Unless you're clouded by politics that is, which I'm not.
She's a strong woman. No snowflake there. What you say, I'm not buying.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#89
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
Notice you avoided my question. It's cool. I think most people can see what this is about.
|
I'm using what she said about Trump to prove my point.
|
|
|
10-10-2017, 02:49 PM
|
#90
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
It's interesting she may have thought Weinstein could end her career, but the President of the United States has zero ability to mess with her life.
Good stuff boys.
Doesn't add up using conventional math...that's the problem. Unless you're clouded by politics that is, which I'm not.
She's a strong woman. No snowflake there. What you say, I'm not buying.
|
So you have no issue with her calling out Trump? Are you really going to pretend that?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|