Yep….take that vax

[classhandicapper]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

Correlation has NEVER meant CAUSE and EFFECT

That's right, but where there is smoke there is often fire.

This is not a court of law. It's not innocent until proven guilty.

With medical treatments and vaccinations it's guilty until proven innocent.

This was approved under EUA and still has never gone through the same level of testing as other treatments. That means we should be even more aware of warning signs.

With so many reports of significant unexplained excess deaths around the world (non Covid related) a leading suspect has to be the vaccine. There may be some related to lockdowns (delayed medical care, depression, drug/alcohol abuse etc..) and some related to delayed impact from Covid, but it's happening across age groups and it appears to mostly be circulatory system issues (which we know are a side effect of the vaccines). There has also apparently been a spike of new cancer cases . Immune function and cancer was another thing a few scientists/doctors warned about.

At this point we shouldn't be seeing red flags of caution. We should be seeing red rockets until we know exactly what's going on.

[ElKabong]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

That's right, but where there is smoke there is often fire.

This is not a court of law. It's not innocent until proven guilty.

With medical treatments and vaccinations it's guilty until proven innocent.

This was approved under EUA and still has never gone through the same level of testing as other treatments. That means we should be even more aware of warning signs.

With so many reports of significant unexplained excess deaths around the world (non Covid related) a leading suspect has to be the vaccine. There may be some related to lockdowns (delayed medical care, depression, drug/alcohol abuse etc..) and some related to delayed impact from Covid, but it's happening across age groups and it appears to mostly be circulatory system issues (which we know are a side effect of the vaccines). There has also apparently been a spike of new cancer cases . Immune function and cancer was another thing a few scientists/doctors warned about.

At this point we shouldn't be seeing red flags of caution. We should be seeing red rockets until we know exactly what's going on.

Very well said

[Poindexter]

I had the numbers typed and lost it. Not going to go through it again. But basically using the numbers from coronavirus worldometer for the state of Washington, and using the assumptions that the 20-1 ratio of deaths last year was accurate and the 3.1 to 1 ratio the state of Washington has posted on their web site, I came up with 67% of the deaths between 11/1/21 and 7/31/21 would have been vaccinated. Pretty closely correlated to the percentage of the population fully vaccinated. Surely not seeing benefits of a Vax at this point. It is all risk no benefit imo. Also the way it is trending would not be surprised if it climbs higher or even much higher. Jeff is seeing reports of as high as 90% vaxxed getting covid in some places, would not be surprised if the vaccine death percentage follows along.

But no worries, the new Omicron targeting ones are just weeks away. People are going to swallow them up like candy.

Moreover they are going to be so hyped by the msm.

[Inner Dirt]

They have really kicked up the pro vax ads on TV around here.

[Jeff P]

There's a new Excess Mortality study out of Germany written about here.

From the study --

August 10, 2022
Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022:
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...many_2020-2022

DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.27319.19365

License CC BY 4.0

Authors:
Christof Kuhbandner
Universität Regensburg

Matthias Reitzner
Universität Osnabrück

Abstract

The present study estimates the burden of COVID-19 on mortality. The state-of-the-art method of actuarial science is used to estimate the expected number of all-cause deaths in 2020 to 2022, if there had been no pandemic. Then the number of observed all-cause deaths is compared with this expected number of all-cause deaths, yielding the excess mortality in Germany for the pandemic years 2020 to 2022.

The expected number of deaths is computed using the period life tables provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany and the longevity factors of the generation life table provided by the German Association of Actuaries. In addition, the expected number of deaths is computed for each month separately and compared to the observed number, yielding the monthly development of excess mortality. Finally, the increase in stillbirths in the years 2020 to 2022 is examined.

In 2020, the observed number of deaths was close to the expected number with respect to the empirical standard deviation. By contrast, in 2021, the observed number of deaths was two empirical standard deviations above the expected number. The high excess mortality in 2021 was almost entirely due to an increase in deaths in the age groups between 15 and 79 and started to accumulate only from April 2021 onwards. A similar mortality pattern was observed for stillbirths with an increase of about 11 percent in the second quarter of the year 2021.

Something must have happened in April 2021 that led to a sudden and sustained increase in mortality in the age groups below 80 years, although no such effects on mortality had been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic so far.

7 Conclusion

The present study used the state-of-the-art method of actuarial science to estimate the expected number of all-cause deaths and the increase in all-cause mortality for the pandemic years 2020 to 2022 in Germany.

In 2020 the observed number of deaths was extremely close to the expected number, but in 2021 the observed number of deaths was far above the expected number in the order of twice the empirical standard deviation. The analysis of the age-dependent monthly excess mortality showed, that a high excess mortality observed in the age groups between 15 and 79 starting from April 2021 is responsible for the excess mortality in 2021. An analysis of the number of stillbirths revealed a similar mortality pattern than observed for the age group between 15 and 79 years.

As a starting point for further investigations explaining this mortality patterns, we compared the excess mortality to the number of reported COVID-19 deaths and the number of COVID-19 vaccinations. This leads to several open questions, the most important beeing the covariation between the excess mortality and the COVID-19 vaccinations.

From the write up on Substack --

Eugyppius | Aug 27 2022
Exhaustive study of German mortality data finds excess deaths tightly correlated with mass vaccination:
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/exhausti...rman-mortality

Excess mortality in Germany 2020–2022 is a preprint by Christof Kuhbandner (a psychologist at Regensburg) and Matthias Reitzner (a statistician at Osnabrück) that applies sophisticated actuarial analysis to the publicly available all-cause mortality data provided by the German government. It turns out that when you account for historical mortality trends, the virus no longer looks so dangerous, and the vaccines no longer look so great.

From the abstract:

"In 2020, the observed number of deaths was close to the expected number with respect to the empirical standard deviation. By contrast, in 2021, the observed number of deaths was two empirical standard deviations above the expected number. The high excess mortality in 2021 was almost entirely due to an increase in deaths in the age groups between 15 and 79 and started to accumulate only from April 2021 onwards. A similar mortality pattern was observed for stillbirths with an increase of about 11 percent in the second quarter of the year 2021.

Something must have happened in April 2021 that led to a sudden and sustained increase in mortality in the age groups below 80 years, although no such effects on mortality had been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic so far."

What happened in April 2021 was the beginning of mass vaccination across Germany.

I spent some time reading the study and believe the methodology employed by the authors to be sound. Both authors appear well respected and credentialed. Christof Kuhbandner is a psychologist at Regensbur with 76 published works to his name. Matthias Reitzner is a statistician at Osnabrück with 52 published works to his name.

The study is a Preprint and will undergo peer review.

Imo --

• The conclusion of the authors seems straightforward, and can be paraphrased as follows:

Using actuarial methods, we observed an onset of excess mortality in the data that coincides with the timing of vaccine rollout. Something (we have no idea what) must have happened in April, 2021 to make the excess mortality possible.

• The authors were careful in their phrasing. They ended their conclusion with:

"Something must have happened in April 2021 that led to a sudden and sustained increase in mortality in the age groups below 80 years, although no such effects on mortality had been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic so far.

• Had they used stronger language I doubt their work would have seen the light of day. I also think doing that would have meant putting their livelihoods at risk.

• It is beyond ridiculous how carefully credentialed people doing the actual research have to tread - at least until the dam breaks.

• And yes, the dam is going to break at some point. Just not yet.

• By substituting the words Coal Fired Power Plants for the word Vaccines maybe I can nudge the dam a little closer to breaking:

Suppose for the sake of argument new Coal Fired Power Plants everywhere in Germany went operational in April, and excess mortality among young people in Germany shot up two full standard deviations that same month:

Would you be fighting tooth and nail to prevent the root cause from being investigated?

Isn't that basically what Government and the Press all over the free world have now become?



-jp

.

[tbwinner]

New boosters not even finished testing

Fda "confident they're safe"

SAFE FOR ENSURING PFIZER PROFIT !!!!


SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

[classhandicapper]

This is a good thread. It's mostly about the Moderna vaccine.

[Jeff P]

Twitter

For context:

• Israel's mRNA Vaccine Rollout began on Dec 20, 2020.

• Israel's Population by Year:

The current population of Israel in 2022 is 9,038,309, a 1.55% increase from 2021.
• The population of Israel in 2021 was 8,900,059, a 1.63% increase from 2020.
• The population of Israel in 2020 was 8,757,489, a 1.74% increase from 2019.
• The population of Israel in 2019 was 8,607,919, a 1.79% increase from 2018.

All causes deaths in Israel for the first 7 months of 2022 is running 14.4% higher than the first 7 months of 2020 (the year of the Pandemic.)

Yet Israel's population in 2022 is only 3.2% higher than it was in 2020 (the year of the Pandemic.)



-jp
.

__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com

[Elkchester Road]

Originally Posted by Jeff P

https://twitter.com/lpnyofficial/sta...60643899392000


For context:

• Israel's mRNA Vaccine Rollout began on Dec 20, 2020.

• Israel's Population by Year:



All causes deaths in Israel for the first 7 months of 2022 is running 14.4% higher than the first 7 months of 2020 (the year of the Pandemic.)

Yet Israel's population in 2022 is only 3.2% higher than it was in 2020 (the year of the Pandemic.)



-jp
.

Where are the Vaccine Supporters??? I thought they would be all over this by now...shouting it down.

Thanks for the info, Jeff.

[Jeff P]

International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research2 | August 12, 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna:
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80

Franco Giovannini, MD1, Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, MD,DDS2, and Gianpaolo Pisano, MD,OHNS3

1. Surgeon, Acupuncture Specialist, Oxygen-Ozone therapy, Diagnostics, Giovannini Biodiagnostic Center, AMBB Headquarters, Mantua, Italy

2. Surgeon, Specialist in Odontostomatology, Periodontologist, Studio Benzi Dental Clinic, Vigevano (corresponding author Via P. Mascagni, 41, 27029 Vigevano –Pavia, Mantua, Italy, r.riccardo.benzi.cipelli@gmail.com)

3. Surgeon, Specialist in Otolaryngology, Masters in Cytology


ABSTRACT

The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With a dark-field optical microscope,we analyzed peripheral blood, a drop of it from each of 1,006 symptomatic subjects after at least one mRNA injection (Pfizer or Moderna), starting from March 2021. All the demographic data and the basic statistics are summarized in Table 1.

clickable thumbnail below

Of the 1,006 subjects, 426 were males and 580 were females and 141 of them received only a single dose of the mRNA experimental injection, 453 got a second dose, and 412 received a third dose. The average age of the 1,006 subjects was 49 years and their age ranged from 15-85. On the average, 5.77% of the 1,006 individuals had normal blood samples in spite of their COVID-19 symptoms. The remaining 94.23% had abnormal blood samples as illustrated in the 4 cases we selected out of the 12 who were normal before receiving any mRNA injections but were no longer normal afterward. For each case, a drop of blood was drawn by pricking a finger and was analyzed under a ZEISS Primostar or LEITZ Laborlux 12 dark-field microscope. The observation of the blood under an optical microscope in a dark-field took place an average of thirty days after the last inoculation. From a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 20 photographs were taken for each patient examined. All initial observations were made at 40x magnification except for digital 3x enlargements to 120x for certain objects of interest. Measurements were performed with DeltaPix InSight Software.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, blood samples of 1,006 symptomatic subjects after one or more anti-COVID mRNA injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna were analyzed under an optical microscope in the dark-field. Of the 1,006 cases, 948 (94.23%) showed various alterations in their blood. Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls. The particulate infiltrates, whatever they may consist of, gave the appearance of a starry sky at night. All of the abnormal blood samples of injected persons, the 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples. Our results are so similar to those of Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample. Our findings, however, are bolstered by their parallel analysis of the fluids in vials of the mRNA concoctions alongside centrifuged plasma samples from the cases they studied intensively. What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines”. In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

The blood tests of 12 subjects, carried out with the same methodology before they received any mRNA injections, showed perfectly normal hematological features as documented with the 4 exemplary cases selected from among those 12 to represent all 948 of the abnormal samples we examined. The alterations found after the injection of our patient/cases with mRNA materials (whatever may be in them), we found what we believe is conclusive evidence that the modifications observed, as these persons went from normal blood profiles to very abnormal ones, must be attributed to the proximate mRNA injections.

We assert unequivocally that the 4 cases described in this series are representative of the 948 cases in which extraordinarily anomalous structures and substances were found. The alterations in the erythrocytes show a tendency to aggregation/disintegration, stacking in rouleaux, hemolysis, and other conditions suggestive for an important alteration of their zeta potential (Davidson et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2014; Davidson & Winey, 2021). Furthermore, there is a well-known tendency for fibrin to cluster that was documented in the biomedical research long ago. These alterations are likely, in our opinions, if not certain,to be involved in producing the coagulation disorders commonly reported after anti-COVID injections (Long et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021; Seneff et al., 2022). There is also the known vascular toxicity of the spike protein itself (Lei et al., 2021; J. Liu et al., 2021), the principal factor in mRNA injections (Nance & Meier, 2021) and one of the adverse effects in some of the subjects inoculated with mRNA vaccines (Long et al., 2020; Aldén et al., 2022; Trougakos et al., 2022).

With the hematological pictures we have presented here it is reasonable to expect reactivation of oncological disease along with blood circulation disorders. Nearly two decades ago, Miller et al. (2004) showed that disruption of the coagulation pathway was associated with a higher incidence of malignancies. With that research in mind, the observed abnormalities already found in our micrographs of individuals injected with one or more of the experimental mRNA concoctions of Pfizer or Moderna, can no doubt be attributed in part to the foreign materials some of which we suspect are graphene-family particles. These have been observed by many other expert researchers who have examined the so-called “mRNA vaccines”. What appear to be graphene based technological composites of some sort have been widely discussed by competent researchers including Armin Koroknay (2021), Pablo Campra (2021), Robert O. Young (2021), the distinguished group of New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDOS, 2022), Andreas Noack (2022), and others. All these doctors and researchers have also examined the actual contents of the so-called SARS-CoV-2 “vaccines”. Additionally, Lee et al. (2022)showed that the strange particulated matter found in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections, also appeared in centifuged blood plasma from recipients of those injections. Such graphene-family materials have been intensively studied by researchers for decades and increasingly so since COVID-19. A Web of Science search for “graphene AND covid” produced 190 hits and “graphene AND vaccine” turned up 124 hits on July 30, 2022. However, a search for “graphene oxide” generated 133,756 dating from 1995 to the present. Taking account of the findings of Ou et al. (2016),showing that “graphene-family nanomaterials” have been associated with “physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis” on account of their stressful impact on “toll-like receptors-. . . , transforming growth factor β-(TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)”, if the mRNA concoctions by Pfizer and Moderna do contain the suspected graphene materials, they are implicated as disease causing in the recipients of those vaccines.

A second factor known to be involved in disruption of complex biosignaling at the post-translation level of protein production is the supposedly “safe and effective” artificial mRNA concoction aiming to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the injection recipients. The coding sequence for that spike component was detailed and praised by Nance and Meier (2021) who said that its artificial modifications “cloak mRNA vaccines from the immune system” (p. 753) and supposedly cause the mRNA injected to persevere in producing one spike protein after another by somehow evading the microRNAs that normally regulate the disassembly of the mRNA soon after the protein is produced. But that is not supposed to happen, according to Nance and Meier with the mRNA in Pfizer and Moderna. They suppose the artificial mRNA in those concoctions, containing “the modified nucleobase N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ)” in the place of the normal Uracil, in addition to hiding them from the normal immune functions of the body will “increase their stability” (p. 749), their “protein production” (p. 751), “their half-life” (p. 752), while “decreasing TLR3 activation” (p. 751)on account of the cloaking modifications.

If they are correct in their claims, the research of Palzer et al. (2022) concerning the special role of “the RNA-binding protein KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP)” must be taken into consideration. According to Palzer et al. theK SRP regulatory protein “controls the mRNA stability . . . by initiation of mRNA decay and inhibition of translation, and by enhancing the maturation of microRNAs” (p. 1). Then note that “KSRP-mediated mRNA decay of pro-inflammatory factors is necessary . . . for the induction of robust immune responses.. . . In cancer, KSRP has often been associated with tumor growth and metastasis” (p. 1). It follows that if the mRNA of the Pfizer and Moderna injections merely do what Nance and Meier claim, they must interfere with KSRP and its post-translation regulatory functions which would seem likely to cause reduction of immune functions and greater likelihood of new or recurrent tumorigenesis.

Taken together, the toxic blood clotting impact of graphene-family nanoparticles and whatever other particulate matter may be causing clotting, along with the disruptive influence of the modified mRNA producing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in a manner interfering with the KSRP splicing re[g]ulatory protein, would it be unreasonable to suppose that the sudden onset of physical and mental senility (marasma) seen in our Case No. 4 was probably directly caused by the Moderna injections?

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures ,is unprecedented. Such phenomena have never been seen before after any “vaccination” of the past. In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow especially at the level of the capillaries. As far as we know, such self-aggregation phenomena have only been documented after the COVID-19 mRNA injections were first authorized, then ,mandated in some countries, and now are still being widely distributed in more than 12.3 billion doses (Bloomberg.com, 2022). Further studies are needed to determine the precise nature and purposes of the foreign particles found in the blood drops of about 94% of the mRNA recipients we have studied. Where do they come from and why are they in these injections?1

A long but worthwhile read.

If nothing else, look at the images.

Imo, the examples where the authors present an image of normal blood (before vaccination) side by side against an image of abnormal blood (same patient after vaccination) are pretty compelling.

It might take some time, but one of the things researchers are currently working on is getting millions of blood images like those in this study into a database.

From there have AI image recognition software train on the dataset and get to the point where the AI is able to detect both abnormal and normal blood images with near 100% accuracy.

At which point early detection for people unaware they are at elevated risk for blood clot, stroke, cancer, etc. gets a whole lot easier.


-jp

.

[Jeff P]

I keep going back to Pfizer's clinical vaccine trial where the Vaccine group had a 23.5% higher death rate than the Placebo group and the FDA insisting that none of the excess mortality resulted from the vaccine.

I wonder if the FDA might have reached a different conclusion had anyone thought to take before and after blood images similar to those the Italian doctors included in their study.

Clickable thumbnails below.


-jp

.

[PaceAdvantage]

Your last two posts are absolutely frightening. And if in any way represents truth, this is going to be the biggest medical disaster ever to not be reported by the legacy media.

Or maybe it is working as intended...a THANOS-type event planned for and counted on to see how best THEY can reduce the world's population.

Notice COVID killed off mostly the old and the sick and the weak.

Just like Hitler.

[xtb]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Your last two posts are absolutely frightening. And if in any way represents truth, this is going to be the biggest medical disaster ever to not be reported by the legacy media.

Or maybe it is working as intended...a THANOS-type event planned for and counted on to see how best THEY can reduce the world's population.

Notice COVID killed off mostly the old and the sick and the weak.

Just like Hitler.

Come on man, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."

[Jeff P]

Subtle update on Toxicity from the official gov.UK website.

Public Health England | Updated 16 August 2022
Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...vid-19-vaccine

Scroll down towards the bottom of the page at the above link.

Toxicity conclusions

The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available. In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern. Adequate advice with regard to women of childbearing potential, pregnant women and breastfeeding women has been provided in both the Information for UK Healthcare Professionals and the Information for UK recipients.

A little late for all of the pregnant and breast feeding women who were assured it was perfectly safe.

Expect more of this.


-jp

.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by Jeff P

Subtle update on Toxicity from the official gov.UK website.

Public Health England | Updated 16 August 2022
Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...vid-19-vaccine

Scroll down towards the bottom of the page at the above link.




A little late for all of the pregnant and breast feeding women who were assured it was perfectly safe.

Expect more of this.


-jp

.

Maybe this is the New Exacta Abortion: Off both mother and child with toxic drugs.