 |
|
09-28-2018, 04:33 PM
|
#1606
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,651
|
Question:
If they dump Special K at this point and put up, say, the Christian Cultist (female), would they be able to confirm prior to mid terms?
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 04:44 PM
|
#1607
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,821
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Question:
If they dump Special K at this point and put up, say, the Christian Cultist (female), would they be able to confirm prior to mid terms?
|
No way
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 04:45 PM
|
#1608
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Question:
If they dump Special K at this point and put up, say, the Christian Cultist (female), would they be able to confirm prior to mid terms?
|
I don't think they could confirm her before mid-terms but her hearings wouldn't take nearly as long. She was appointed just a year ago and went through confirmation process then... plus she just has a lot less legalese to pick apart vs. a guy like Kavanaugh.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 04:49 PM
|
#1609
|
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Question:
If they dump Special K at this point and put up, say, the Christian Cultist (female), would they be able to confirm prior to mid terms?
|
The repubs lost that advantage by giving in to the demand of having the hearing yesterday based on the lie Ford cannot travel by airplane.
If they would have scheduled the hearing last week or early on in the current week, there may have been a slight chance.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 04:53 PM
|
#1610
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Diez meses en Port St. Lucie, FL; two months in the Dominican Republic
Posts: 4,355
|
I agree with Ralph.To give an example Anthony Kennedy ,a non controversial choice if there ever was one,was nominated by Ronald Reagan on November 11, 1987 and was voted in (97-0, btw) on February 3,1988.The hearings only lasted 3 days.Granted there was a Christmas break in between but that was still almost 3 months.
__________________
"But don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. "
Fleetwood Mac, Oh Well, Part 1 (1969)
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:10 PM
|
#1611
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:18 PM
|
#1612
|
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Ford's attorneys stating they want no artificial time limits or limits in scope. And here it comes, thank you Flake for letting the obstructionists obstruct.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:23 PM
|
#1613
|
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
Ford's attorneys stating they want no artificial time limits or limits in scope. And here it comes, thank you Flake for letting the obstructionists obstruct.
|
Yeah, like what Ford's attorney's got to say about anything means a damn... 
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:26 PM
|
#1615
|
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
|
Very poor article....Way off base... 
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:51 PM
|
#1616
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,005
|
PA a good leading indicator. The tea leaves are starting to say that Trump is wavering on Judge Kavanaugh and the failed process (the steam roller has apparently broken down and is stuck in a ditch). In spite of what he said about K.'s testimony yesterday, I am of the opinion that Trump is put off by the guy's penchant for alcohol, his petulance, and his sniveling teariness on national tv.
By the way, if you had "I like beer," "boofing," and "Devil's Triangle" on your card yesterday, you won Kavanaugh Bingo.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:52 PM
|
#1617
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
Ford's attorneys stating they want no artificial time limits or limits in scope. And here it comes, thank you Flake for letting the obstructionists obstruct.
|
You prefer just pushing the vote and losing 52-48?
I would have.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:54 PM
|
#1618
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
Sorry you don't understand Boxie, you're way out of your league here, as I've forgotten more than you know of what's truly going down. Please refrain from replying to my posts in these matters.....I don't need the aggravation of explaining it to you, or for that matter anyone else, as you can just read what I post here and in the "Q" thread. If you can find anyone who knows more than I do from a "Q" perspective in these matters, read and respond to their posts, if they actually exist.....But until then, I will post what I KNOW, as I've put in the work since the beginning of "Q"...….The Greatest Military Intel Operation in History.
|
You mean what you THINK you know. I know exactly how liberals think. I'm always steps ahead of them because they're very predictable.
As we speak, the dimwits are working on plan "D" to derail K in the event Mitchy Boy caves in and gives them, yet, ANOTHER week they want. The dimwits know the Feds would come up empty in that phony baloney week long investigation. If the dimwits were serious about a real investigation and they really believed there was something of credible, legal substance to Ford's allegations, they would never put such a restrictive time limit on something to investigate that is nearly 4 decades old! Do you even know what a Cold Case Investigation is? And do you even know that that kind of investigation requires the skills of an expert that was specially trained to investigate very old cases? Well, here's a clue for you: It's much worse than that for the dims because there was never formal complaint filed and, therefore, NO CASE!  Therefore, as I said in my previous post, it's all about buying more time so that they can find a new victim to bring charges against Mr. K.
If O'Connell is smart, he'll call their bluff and have the vote Tuesday and not give them the time they so desperately want.
This is all so transparently obvious, it's truly a wonder I have to spell it out for you. 
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:57 PM
|
#1619
|
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
You prefer just pushing the vote and losing 52-48?
I would have.
|
No, I would have preferred Flake not to go back on his word.
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2018, 05:59 PM
|
#1620
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
@
