Using your exact quotes...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote Master
Please don’t think that the “people putting on the show” are surviving in this game by winning just the purse monies!
|
Many of them are doing just that.
Most owners are in it for the thrill, prestige, fun, or such.
Most didn't get involved in it to make money.
They pay the trainer a monthly fee.
Most owners either don't bet or don't bet enough to affect the pools.
Most trainers either don't bet or don't bet enough to affect the pools.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote Master
The “Write-off’s” are usually groups or syndicates that use their involvement in horse racing as just that: A tax write-off.
|
Do you think think that they can deduct 100% of the losses from their taxes? They
might be able to deduct it from their income. That means that they only save the 15-38% they would have paid in tax. They lose the other 62-85%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote Master
Remember the animal doesn’t even know it exists. In training, all it knows how to do is eat, sleep and run.
|
That's not close to being true. Horses are much more complex than that. It's obvious that you've never spent much time on the backside of the track. Ask almost any trainer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote Master
The “Wagering” are those that make up the majority of owners, who fill most of the race cards at every track. These people bet on their charges (and others) in order to survive in this game, and it’s no surprise considering the costs of keeping an animal in proper training and care.
|
Not close to the majority. Not even 10% of the owners bet with the purpose of "surviving." Most of that 10% are both owner and trainer. Most of those "survive" by working as assistants for larger barns. Most of the owners "survive" by working at their career job, which is very rarely in the racing industry. Their real life jobs pay the bills for their horse racing diversion as owners. Again, it's obvious that you've never spent much time with horsemen or around the barns.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote Master
I'll just add some more insight to Mr. Ainsile’s expression by saying “Inside information is for the sparrows, but Inside money is for the hawks”.
|
Since you've proven that you have no idea about stables, owners, or the backstretch, it's obvious that your "inside money" theories are full of holes. No substance. Not rooted in reality. You're exposed as a fraud.
You may now twist everything I said around and say the opposite---that's your game plan, right?