|
|
08-23-2021, 11:31 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 310
|
|
|
|
08-23-2021, 11:35 PM
|
#17
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,643
|
This is what YOU WROTE:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light
Public health officials are aggressively dispelling claims by right-wing media personalities who have been promoting an anti-parasitic drug used for livestock as a potential Covid-19 treatment.
"You are not a horse. You are not a cow," the US Food and Drug Administration tweeted Saturday. "Seriously, y'all. Stop it."
|
You wrote "PROMOTING AN ANTI-PARASITIC DRUG USED FOR LIVESTOCK AS A POTENTIAL COVID-19 TREATMENT"
implying that Ivermectin is only used on animals and not approved for human use.
YOU ARE THE ONE promoting the GASLIGHTING, once again.
You provided zero context...you only pushed the agenda further.
Ivermectin is approved for use in human beings. Stop trying to obsfucate.
Anyone taking doses of Ivermectin meant for livestock deserves all the side-effects they get...right up there with the same people who supposedly believed Trump told them to drink bleach (which he didn't).
|
|
|
08-23-2021, 11:41 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 433
|
I've been drinking bleach a year. Diluted, mind you. And I'm still alive.
|
|
|
08-23-2021, 11:46 PM
|
#19
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz
I've been drinking bleach a year. Diluted, mind you. And I'm still alive.
|
Lavoris works better
|
|
|
08-23-2021, 11:48 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,291
|
Peer Reviewed Ivermectin Study:
Prophylactic Role of Ivermectin in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Among Healthcare Workers:
https://www.cureus.com/articles/6480...thcare-workers
Quote:
Published: August 05, 2021 (see history)
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16897
Cite this article as: Behera P, Patro B K, Padhy B M, et al. (August 05, 2021) Prophylactic Role of Ivermectin in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Among Healthcare Workers. Cureus 13(8): e16897. doi:10.7759/cureus.16897
Abstract
Introduction
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are vulnerable to getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Preventing HCWs from getting infected is a priority to maintain healthcare services. The therapeutic and preventive role of ivermectin in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is being investigated. Based on promising results of in vitro studies of oral ivermectin, this study was conducted with the aim to demonstrate the prophylactic role of oral ivermectin in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhubaneswar.
Methods
A prospective cohort study was conducted at AIIMS Bhubaneswar, which has been providing both COVID and non-COVID care since March 2020. All employees and students of the institute who provided written informed consent participated in the study. The uptake of two doses of oral ivermectin (300 µg/kg/dose at a gap of 72 hours) was considered as exposure. The primary outcome of the study was COVID-19 infection in the following month of ivermectin consumption, diagnosed as per Government of India testing criteria (real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]) guidelines. The log-binomial model was used to estimate adjusted relative risk (ARR), and the Kaplan-Meier failure plot was used to estimate the probability of COVID-19 infection with follow-up time.
Results
Of 3892 employees, 3532 (90.8%) participated in the study. The ivermectin uptake was 62.5% and 5.3% for two doses and single dose, respectively. Participants who took ivermectin prophylaxis had a lower risk of getting symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection (6% vs 15%). HCWs who had taken two doses of oral ivermectin had a significantly lower risk of contracting COVID-19 infection during the following month (ARR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12-0.23). Females had a lower risk of contracting COVID-19 than males (ARR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93). The absolute risk reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 9.7%. Only 1.8% of the participants reported adverse events, which were mild and self-limiting.
Conclusion
Two doses of oral ivermectin (300 µg/kg/dose given 72 hours apart) as chemoprophylaxis among HCWs reduced the risk of COVID-19 infection by 83% in the following month. Safe, effective, and low-cost chemoprophylaxis has relevance in the containment of pandemic alongside vaccine.
|
-jp
.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
|
|
|
08-23-2021, 11:53 PM
|
#21
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff P
Peer Reviewed Ivermectin Study:
Conclusion
Two doses of oral ivermectin (300 µg/kg/dose given 72 hours apart) as chemoprophylaxis among HCWs reduced the risk of COVID-19 infection by 83% in the following month. Safe, effective, and low-cost chemoprophylaxis has relevance in the containment of pandemic alongside vaccine.
-jp
.
|
Good find Jeff......Always on your game....
|
|
|
08-23-2021, 11:55 PM
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
This is what YOU WROTE:
You wrote "PROMOTING AN ANTI-PARASITIC DRUG USED FOR LIVESTOCK AS A POTENTIAL COVID-19 TREATMENT"
implying that Ivermectin is only used on animals and not approved for human use.
YOU ARE THE ONE promoting the GASLIGHTING, once again.
You provided zero context...you only pushed the agenda further.
Ivermectin is approved for use in human beings. Stop trying to obsfucate.
Anyone taking doses of Ivermectin meant for livestock deserves all the side-effects they get...right up there with the same people who supposedly believed Trump told them to drink bleach (which he didn't).
|
There have actually been articles the last couple weeks about people consuming horse/cattle/sheep ivermectin paste and getting to much. They recommend keeping animal formulations for the animals.
I still have some cattle pour-on that I am going to put on my arm.
Last edited by davew; 08-23-2021 at 11:56 PM.
|
|
|
08-24-2021, 01:14 AM
|
#23
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,643
|
People wouldn't have to resort to livestock doses or formulations of Ivermectin if the system itself weren't so corrupt.
That's the real issue everyone will ignore.
|
|
|
08-24-2021, 03:17 AM
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,601
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
|
|
|
|
08-24-2021, 08:25 AM
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Bill Gates has said publicly there are seven billion people in the world and there should only be 500 million to save THE planet and the best way to do that is through vaccinations . He’s proven that with what he did in India and Africa with vaccinating thousands of people under the guise he was fighting disease and instead killed them or rendered them impotent. He was thrown out of those countries and banned forever. Fauci, Soros and Hilary are all of some of the ones who believe this too.
https://jayceescommentaries.wordpres...-depopulation/
But the Lights of this world will never get it. They think governments are nice, altruistic, compassionate entities that always have the best interests of the masses in their dark little hearts!
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
08-24-2021, 10:06 AM
|
#26
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,643
|
Yup...
And the Jews once thought that if they "played nice" with the Nazis, everything would be OK.
They thought, no way they would treat GERMAN CITIZENS so poorly...
Yup...powerful and/or wealthy people/groups with hidden and not-so-hidden agendas never exist. And they especially never exist with extreme access and influence on governments.
These have always been just conspiracy theories.
|
|
|
08-24-2021, 12:53 PM
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,285
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
There have actually been articles the last couple weeks about people consuming horse/cattle/sheep ivermectin paste and getting to much. They recommend keeping animal formulations for the animals.
I still have some cattle pour-on that I am going to put on my arm.
|
You would have to be a moron to not be able to figure out the right paste dosage. The paste is sold with a scalable dispenser.
__________________
Best writing advice ever received: Never use a long word when a diminutive one will suffice.
|
|
|
08-25-2021, 11:45 PM
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
|
|
|
08-26-2021, 04:16 AM
|
#29
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,643
|
It's amazing that when it comes to COVID, the USA is not allowing doctors to practice medicine.
46zilzal should be alarmed.
BTW, that article you linked to is once again full of bullshit propaganda.
Not until you get to the BOTTOM OF THE ARTICLE, does it mention that:
Quote:
The FDA has approved the anti-parasite drug in both people and animals for some parasitic worms, head lice and skin conditions.
|
Please note the key word, PEOPLE.
If you read the headline and most of the article, you'd think this doctor was prescribing giant buckets of livestock doses of ivermectin.
Seriously people...do you not see it?
|
|
|
08-26-2021, 08:47 AM
|
#30
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
|
Like giving a cancer drug to people that present with pneumonia
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|