Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 10-15-2018, 12:26 PM   #32
metro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 444
What is cumbersome about it?

I could call a person that works in the mutuel department at Keeneland and ask them how much their handle was from, as an example, Cantebury Park on Saturday. They could give me the amount almost immediately. With a slight delay they could tell me what they handled on the QE II race. With another slight delay they could tell me what they handled in the WPS pools on that race.

For the purpose of on track wagering they could tell me which tote machine handled the most money on the day, how much was handled on that machine within the last two minutes of wagering of a specific race, how much was accounted for by a specific bettor. See where I'm going?

Sure an upgrade to the system would make the process of tracking wagers more seamless, however the current system still does have that capability, regardless of how archaic the system may be. It can be done, every wagering dollar, regardless of the pool it is intended for, HAS to be accounted for, it IS every race track's, simulcast venue or ADW provider's livelihood.
metro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.