Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Exotic1
The #5 and #7 were running backwards. Insanity.
|
When i see this type of stuff, i think they're judging the races on a "foul is a foul" and affecting the outcome means nothing.
There was an objection in the 5th third against 2nd and this was a situation that didn't affect the outcome, but the 2nd place finisher did not maintain an exact straight line....but in the 7th, the judges required that the 3 maintain an exact straight line in a foul is a foul situation, so the judging didn't seem consistent in races that were an hour apart.
Not sure what to think about this, but between Mountain and CT, you never know what these judges are going to do.
