Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hcap
Please, the "odds" presently are 97% climatologists, overwhelming numbers of universities, domestic and international scientific agencies both private and governmental,
Versus PA off topic climate deniers, The Heartland Institute, Exxon Mobile, and Anthony Watts and other unqualified tv weatherman caliber pseudo- sort of experts
Versus And let' not forget..
|
So what?
One of the tenants of the scientific method is being able to reproduce results of experiments. However, in this case, there are not any experiments, just a lot of data and computer models.
The computer models used by that 97% all assume critical aspects and it only takes 1 error in those assumptions to make the model and the extrapolations wrong. Since the models have yet to make correct predictions I believe there is still something wrong with the assumptions.
