Quote:
Originally Posted by 098poi
I read the article but I find what was done (allegedly) confusing.
Could someone break it down in more simple terms?
Thanks in advance.
|
In a nutshell, you had 2 players (in theory) colluding to play against the rest of the field in which they were wagering together on a single entry till that entry was gone, and then started firing their selections on the next one, and ended up winning.
The 1st entry had a $1 Million bonus if he won.
They are also known "business" partners who share their winnings in horse wagering tournaments.
In short, it was a $7,500 tourney, and they started with $15,000 and twice as many bullets as everybody else.
