Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 06-20-2002, 07:36 AM   #42
MikeDee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 294
Racing Management does not have a problem with taking all of the increased revenue that is generated from simulcasting only with spending some of it on upgrading their networks and equipment in order to provide an accurate tote board.

Racing wants to increase its' fan base. These new fans may not know what the pay out on 9-5 is or how much the take is, but everyone understands and expects that the odds don't change after the race starts. The best way I can think of to turn off new fans is to continue to give the appearance that there is something crooked going on

How about this

If they don't want to fix the problem then make a rule that when the race goes off the odds are frozen by the host track and any bets in the pipeline are the responsibility of the sending wagering hub to pay at the official off odds. In other words the simulcasting sites have to eat the difference. Give ya 9-5 that it won't take them very long to upgrade the equipment if this was required.

Last edited by MikeDee; 06-20-2002 at 07:44 AM.
MikeDee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.