|
We KNOW 100% odds change DURING races otherwise there would be nothing to dispute, so why is the burden of proof ONLY put on proving that there is past posting and not the opposite? Several people have posted on how timestamps can and have been manipulated and I would think anybody with "real" proof would be involved in some way. Too much money would be involved to not have the highest security possible.
And the title change to "No real" as opposed to something like "PROOF of PAST POSTING(IMO)" goes along that same line. To the OP it was proof to him, but I guess its for the moderators to decide.
100% FACT is that the odds change DURING races.
|
