Quote:
Originally Posted by LemonSoupKid
I'd like to hear one great argument on the PASPA side.
This is the most clearly unconstitutional law going, and it's not even close. It is breathtakingly idiotic and it's an embarrassment to American jurisprudence that this is even a question. Seriously, with judges like those at the district and appellate court level, no wonder why no one respects the legal profession.
Not only is it illogical in every way, it violates the 10th Amendment from the get-go. Which is proven by the fact that they allowed anyone to have it, or keep it --- and then make it unequal (only Vegas with single game betting, lol), then this, then that, it's a total joke.
|
I have argued that same point here for how many years.
Starting with Christie one and carried on with Christie two.
Jersey should control jersey,s law.
Not the Feds.
The justices made very good points if the point was to stop sports betting in America, they could have passed a law stating that and preempt all states laws.
Instead they passed PASPA allowing Nevada to keep their sports betting while restricting all other states.
Patently unconstitutional.
Allan
