Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ
After reading the "Candybag Prospectus" here on the message board for several weeks, here is what I can glean from the postings.
First, critical details are constantly left to our imagination under the guise of a proprietary solution.
Second, Candybag pushes a business model that would inject his/her self-funded company between any state and the federal Medicaid program, effectively trying to leverage a first mover privatization of the price negotiation process.
In posting here, Candybag is attempting to execute a "carrot-and-stick" strategy where he gets horse racing to support his/her ideas with the goal of some free money down the road - which will absolutely never materialize.
Think of it this way : if Candybag posted the exact same concept on a message board for QUILTERS and CRAFTERS saying that major investment would help their product costs down the road, would the pitch be any different?
Candybag is not trolling. Instead, Candybag is attempting to bait-and-switch all of the readers.
|
Thank you for your independent analysis. I need nothing from the readers of this forum, the idea is on its way to proper review.
Considering the people in position of authority are intelligent, I expect and welcome their due diligence. I hope nobody was thinking the authorities would blindly hand me the keys to the kingdom.
I thank PaceAdvantage for his post above, it seems to indirectly acknowledge the preceding statement about people in authority and inherent safeguards in a confidential environment.
Let's be clear: I will be presenting my idea to people in authority, not the general public. I do appreciate and respect the feedback received; it help sharpened my idea.
