Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Phantom
Why was that 4 at 4-1 at post time to begin with? That is the underlying question. Virtually all of these "betdown winners" were lower in the will-pays but much higher at post before the late odds change.
I'll bet if you could see the wagering information, you'd see significant cancellations at post on other horses. It's toteboard manipulation. Plain and simple.
What it doesn't explain is how the overall money is getting it right so often. Much more than at any time in the past.
|
I think this post is close to the equine version of a QAnon supporter. It's like you're willfully ignorant to the fact betmakers, who are probably just as good as the best CAW teams, were laying at 7/5. Ask them why their models are better then the average punter.
