Quote:
Originally Posted by AskinHaskin
That’s completely clueless about the “number one” problem.
There is approximately zero past-posting ongoing, and you can tell that clearly by how quickly they catch and fully report each new loophole such as that which didn’t get wagering stopped on the recent nationwide gimmick wager until shortly after leg one of a five-race sequence.
Even if everybody but you had the advantage on that day - just how great was that edge?
You ‘approximately’ never read anymore about random clerks at tiny tracks ‘past-posting’ in the way you used to get every last detail as to what combinations and what denominations and at which precise second he/she punched the tickets.
The solution is concise and simple for the visible elements of it all, and that equates to putting the public on the live horses to begin with.
If you are of the belief that “dramatic odds changes” are “almost always on the winner” AND “always dramatically down” then there is probably a lot more which you “can’t get your head around”…
beginning with parimutuel wagering.
|
Wow is this some gibberish. Thanks.
