Sidebar

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

In my brilliant analogy of fishing in a flowing stream, do you think the stream flows because it's moving?

The very first two definitions in my W-W for the verb "flow" are these:

1 a (1) : to issue or MOVE in a stream (2) : CIRCULATE b : to MOVE with a continual change of place among the constituent particles *molasses flows slowly*

It's incredible just how slowly your mind moves -- kinda like molasses flowing up Mt Kilamanjaro in the dead of winter.

So...now that defeated you in your stupid and desperate game of semantics, let's get back to a spinless earth. How would that work out for this planet if it stopped spinning suddenly? Good? Poorly? Very Poorly? Extremely Bad? Or you just don't know?

I specifically asked you are you standing on the shores of the "river of time" watching it flow past you", post # 26

Originally Posted by hcap

Before we we go any further down your absurd rabbit hole bunky, first prove time "flows."

Are you standing on the shores of a "river" of time watching it flow past you?

So "flow" or "movement" is not proven, nor as obvious as you think, and your vague relationship with and everything around you with time, is not clear

Your "flowing stream" analogy puts you outside of getting wet. Absurd, we all get drenched.Thru and thru