Quote:
Originally Posted by castaway01
I think people are looking for explanations why he likes to argue things he clearly has no knowledge of. Lawyers can win arguments where they are totally wrong and have no logical basis in fact because they argue it the right way and get a couple people to agree. It often feels like that's what dilanesp does here. He gets proven wrong and then goes on for 50 more posts figuring he'll wear you down like in a court of law and get a hung jury.
|
He's not the only lawyer who posts on this site FWIW. There are many, from what I've read here.
He may want to win every single argument, which isn't possible in the real world when you need facts to prove your case ultimately. Which I've never thought he's had about the reason for John Imbriale moving on to a different role, to bring this back full circle.
