Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Valento
Are you kidding? You aren't seriously debating whether Tom Amoss is winning cleanly right? You don't need a database of infractions to prove or disprove. How about simple arithmatic?
Bring Tom Amoss' statistics to any insurance underwriter to crunch the numbers and provide probability statistics regarding the liklihood that those numbers are achievable in large quantities and the odds are lots of millions to one against.
Do we have to be so dull and obvious as to defend this and not just agree that it is statistically impossible to win with this high rate while using the same, legal practices of their peers?
|
He's making it look easy and pretty soon might be looking for a 'harder game' to conquer.
